Lifelogging pp 283-301

Self-Tracking as Knowledge Production: Quantified Self between Prosumption and Citizen Science



“Self knowledge through numbers“ is the slogan of the growing international Quantified Self movement. This paper deals with the question what kind of knowledge is actually being acquired here and how this knowledge production is to be characterized. It shows that the knowledge production of self-trackers can be positioned in-between prosumption, on the one hand, and citizen science on the other. A typology of self-tracking activities is presented, the main focus being particularly on those that resemble research. These research activities of self-trackers are termed personal science since they attempt to produce verified knowledge using scientific methods and according to scientific criteria, although their object is the researcher him/herself and their goal is practical knowledge for the person’s self-use.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blättel-Mink, B., & Hellmann, K.-U. (2010). Prosumer Revisited. Zur Aktualität einer Debatte. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  2. Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).Google Scholar
  3. Brüninghaus, A., & Heyen, N. (2014). Wissenstransfer von der Gesellschaft in die Wissenschaft? Formen und Potenziale nicht-zertifizierter Expertise für Lebenswissenschaften und Medizin. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis, 23(2), 63-66.Google Scholar
  4. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond. From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission (2013). Green Paper on Citizen Science. Citizen Science for Europe. Accessed 14 Nov 2014.
  6. Fajans, J. (2014). The Art of Personal Science. The STEAM Journal, 1(2). doi:10.5642/steam.20140102.30.
  7. Finke, P. (2014). Citizen Science. Das unterschätzte Wissen der Laien. München: Oekom.Google Scholar
  8. Gläser, J. (2012). Scientific communities. In S. Maasen, M. Kaiser, M. Reinhart, & B. Sutter (Eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftssoziologie (pp. 151-162). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  9. Gscheidle, C., & Fisch, M. (2007). Onliner 2007: Das „Mitmach-Netz“ im Breitbandzeitalter. Media Perspektiven, 8, 393-405.Google Scholar
  10. Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen Science and Volunteered Geographic Information: Overview and Typology of Participation. In D. Sui, S. Elwood, & M. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice (pp. 105-122). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Hasse, R. (2012). Das institutionalistische Programm. In S. Maasen, M. Kaiser, M. Reinhart, & B. Sutter (Eds.), Handbuch Wissenschaftssoziologie (pp. 45-57). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  12. Hellmann, K.-U. (2010). Prosumer Revisited: Zur Aktualität einer Debatte. In B. Blättel-Mink, & K.-U. Hellmann (Eds.), Prosumer Revisited. Zur Aktualität einer Debatte (pp. 13-48). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  13. Hitzler, R. (1994). Wissen und Wesen des Experten. Ein Annäherungsversuch – zur Einleitung. In R. Hitzler, A. Honer, & C. Maeder (Eds.), Expertenwissen: die institutionalisierte Kompetenz zur Konstruktion von Wirklichkeit (pp. 13-30). Opladen: Westdeutscher.Google Scholar
  14. Hughes, B., Joshi, I., & Wareham, J. (2008). Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: Tensions and Controversies in the Field. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 10(3). doi:10.2196/jmir.1056.
  15. Karaboga, M., Matzner, T., Morlok, T., Pittroff, F., Nebel, M., Ochs, C., von Pape, T., Pörschke, J. V., Schütz, P., & Fhom, H. S. (2015). Das versteckte Internet: zu Hause – im Auto – am Körper. White Paper. Schriftenreihe Forum Privatheit und selbstbestimmtes Leben in der digitalen Welt. Eggenstein: Stober.Google Scholar
  16. Laaff, M. (2012). Die Körperkontrolleure kommen.!86056/. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  17. Lupton, D. (2013a). Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 393-403.Google Scholar
  18. Lupton, D. (2013b). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 11(3), 256-270.Google Scholar
  19. Mahr, D. (2014). Citizen Science. Partizipative Wissenschaft im späten 19. und frühen 20. Jahrhundert. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  20. Marcengo, A., & Rapp, A. (2013). Visualization of Human Behavior Data: the Quantified Self. In M. Lin Huang, & W. Huang (Eds.), Innovative Approaches of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics (pp. 236-265). Hershey PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  21. Merton, R. K. (1942). A Note on Science and Democracy. Journal of legal and political sociology, 1, 115-126.Google Scholar
  22. Miller-Rushing, A., Primack, R., & Bonney, R. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 285-290.Google Scholar
  23. Nißen, M. (2013). Quantified Self—An Exploratory Study on the Profiles and Motivations of Self-Tracking. Bachelor Thesis. Karlsruhe: Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT).Google Scholar
  24. Pharabod, A.-S., Nikolski, V., & Granjon, F. (2013). La mise en chiffres de soi. Une approche compréhensive des mesures personnelles. Réseaux, 1, 97-129.Google Scholar
  25. Rauner, M. (2012). Das Handy als Hausarzt. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  26. Rettberg, J. W. (2014): Seeing ourselves through technology. How we use selfies, blogs and wearable devices to see and shape ourselves. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Roberts, S. (2004). Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: Ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(2), 227-262.Google Scholar
  28. Roberts, S. (2010). The unreasonable effectiveness of my self-experimentation. Medical Hypotheses, 75(6), 482-489.Google Scholar
  29. Roy, H. E., Pocock, M. J. O., Preston, C. D., Roy, D. B., Savage, J., Tweddle, J. C., & Robinson, L. D. (2012). Understanding Citizen Science and Environmental Monitoring. Final Report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework. Wallingford: NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.Google Scholar
  30. Selke, S. (2014). Lifelogging. Wie die digitale Selbstvermessung unsere Gesellschaft verändert. Berlin: Econ.Google Scholar
  31. Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467-471.Google Scholar
  32. Swan, M. (2009). Emerging patient-driven health care models: an examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International journal of environmental research and public health, 6(2), 492-525.Google Scholar
  33. Swan, M. (2012a). Health 2050: the realization of personalized medicine through crowdsourcing, the Quantified Self, and the participatory biocitizen. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 2(3), 93-118.Google Scholar
  34. Swan, M. (2012b). Crowdsourced health research studies: an important emerging complement to clinical trials in the public health research ecosystem. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(2), e46. doi:10.2196/jmir.1988.
  35. Swan, M. (2013). The Quantified Self: Fundamental Disruption in Big Data Science and Biological Discovery. Big Data, 1(2), 85-99.Google Scholar
  36. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. The Classic Study of Tomorrow. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  37. Weingart, P. (2003). Wissenschaftssoziologie. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  38. Willke, H. (1998). Systemisches Wissensmanagement. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar
  39. Wolf, G. (2010). The Data-Driven Life. The New York Times—Sunday Magazine, MM38. Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  40. Wolf, G. (2011). What is the Quantified Self? Accessed 18 Nov 2014.
  41. Xue, K. (2014). Popular Science. Havard Magazine (Jan/Feb). Accessed 21 Okt 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KarlsruheDeutschland

Personalised recommendations