Advertisement

USA: Geschlechterforschung von Women’s to Queer Studies

  • Astrid M. FellnerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Geschlecht und Gesellschaft book series (GUG, volume 65)

Zusammenfassung

Die USA ist für die Geschlechterforschung ein wichtiger Ort; die Theoriebildung an US-amerikanischen Universitäten ist global sehr einflussreich. Dieser Beitrag zeigt, wie sich Gender Studies aus den amerikanischen Women’s Studies entwickelt hat, und unternimmt den Versuch einer Bestandsaufnahme.

Schlüsselwörter

Women’s Studies Bürger_innenrechtsbewegung Women of Color Sex-Gender-System Queer Studies 

Literatur

  1. Binder, Beate. 2011. Travelling Gender Studies – eine Einführung. In Travelling gender studies. Grenzüberschreitende Wissens- und Institutionentransfers, Hrsg. Beate Binder, Gabriele Jähnert, Ina Kerner, Eveline Kilian und Hildegard Nickel, 7–20. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
  2. Boxer, Marilyn J. 1988. For and about women: The theory and practice of women’s studies in the United States. In Reconstructing the academy: Women’s education and women’s studies, Hrsg. Elizabeth Minnich, Jean F. O’Barr und Rachel A. Rosenfeld, 69–103. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boxer, Marilyn J. 2001. When women ask the questions: Creating women’s studies in America. Washington: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delphy, Christine. 1995. The invention of French Feminism: An essential move. Yale French studies 87:190–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The dialectic of sex. The case for feminist revolution. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  8. Firestone, Shulamith, und Anne Koeth, Hrsg. 1970. Notes from the second year: Women’s liberation, major writings of the radical feminists. New York: Radical Feminism.Google Scholar
  9. Frey Steffen, Therese. 2017. Gender. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
  10. Friedan, Betty. 1963. The feminine mystique. New York: Dell.Google Scholar
  11. Gilbert, Sandra M., und Susan Gubar. 1979. The madwoman in the attic: The woman writer and the Nineteenth-Century literary imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ginsberg, Alice E. 2008. Triumphs, controversies, and change: Women’s studies 1970s to the twenty-first century. In The evolution of American women’s studies: Reflections on triumphs, controversies, and change, Hrsg. Alice E. Ginsberg, 9–37. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Haraway, Donna. 1985. Manifesto for cyborgs: Science, technology, and socialist feminism in the 1980’s. Socialist Review 80:65–108.Google Scholar
  14. Haraway, Donna. 1988. Situated knowledges. The science question in feminism as a site of discourse on the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 3:575–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. hooks, bell. 1981. Ain’t I a woman? Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hull, Gloria T., Patricia Bell Scott, und Barbara Smith, Hrsg. 1982. All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: Black womenʼs studies. Old Westbury: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, Barbara. 1985. Gender theory and the Yale School. In Rhetoric and form: Deconstruction at Yale, Hrsg. Robert Con Davis und Ronald Schleifer, 101–112. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kosofsky Sedgwick, Eve. 1985. Between men. English literature and male homosocial desire. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Kosofsky Sedgwick, Eve. 1990. Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Millet, Kate. 1970. Sexual politics. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  21. Minh-ha, Trinh T. 1989. Woman, native, other. Writing postcoloniality and feminism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  22. Moers, Ellen. 1976. Literary women: The great writers. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  23. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Ann Russo, und Lourdes Torres, Hrsg. 1991. Third world women and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  24. Money, John, und John G. Hampson. 1955. An examination of some basic sexual concepts: The evidence of human hermaphroditism. Bulletin of Johns Hopkins Hospital 97:301–319.Google Scholar
  25. Moraga, Cherríe, und Gloria Anzaldúa, Hrsg. 1981. This bridge called my back. Writings by radical women of color. Watertown: Persephone Press.Google Scholar
  26. Morgan, Robin, Hrsg. 1970. Sisterhood is powerful. An anthology of writings from the woman’s liberation movement. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, Jean. 2002. From politics to professionalism: Cultural change in women’s studies. In Women’s studies on Its own, Hrsg. Robin Wiegman, 202–210. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rothenberg, Paula. 2008. Women’s studies – the early years: When sisterhood was powerful. In The evolution of American women’s studies: Reflections on triumphs, controversies, and change, Hrsg. Alice E. Ginsberg, 67–86. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rubin, Gayle. 1975. The traffic in women: Notes on the „Political economy of sex. In Toward an anthropology of women, Hrsg. Rayna Reiter, 790–794. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, Joan W. 1986. Gender: A useful category of historical analysis. American Historical Review 91(5): 1053–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Showalter, Elaine. 1977. A literature of their own: British women novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Showalter, Elaine. 1981. Feminist criticism in the wilderness. Critical Inquiry 8(2): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stoller, Robert. 1968. Sex and gender. On the development of masculinity and femininity. New York: Science House.Google Scholar
  34. Vinken, Barbara, Hrsg. 1992. Dekonstruktiver Feminismus. Literaturwissenschaft in Amerika. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  35. Zimmerman, Bonnie. 2005. Beyond dualisms: Some thoughts about the future of women’s studies. In Women’s studies for the future, Hrsg. Elizabeth Lapovsky Kenney und Agatha Beins, 31–39. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Anglistik, Amerikanistik und Anglophone KulturenUniversität des SaarlandesSaarbrückenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations