Our Thinking – Must it be Aligned only to the Given Data?

Chapter
First Online:

Zusammenfassung

New technological possibilities in Big Data allow finding unexpected structures and relations in datasets, provided by different realms and areas. This article distinguishes between signals, data, information and knowledge, and discusses ownership of data and information. Knowledge will be considered as the result of understanding information. The results of big data analyses cannot be adequately interpreted if the research question, i.e. the question of what to look for, has not been asked beforehand. Thus, a model is required to perform a satisfactory data analysis. A model, which allows a causal explanation, is better than a model, which delivers only extrapolations. The potential tendency to replace scientific models with merely numerical procedures will be discussed critically.

“True wisdom, as the fruit of self-examination, dialogue and generous encounter between persons, is not acquired by a mere accumulation of data which eventually leads to overload and confusion, a sort of mental pollution.” (Pope Francis (2015), IV, Sec. 47, p. 33)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. *um & HP - The unbelievable Machine Company & Hewlett Packard. 2015. Hadoop2 – Big Data Projekte erfolgreich realisieren. White Paper, Berlin 2014. https://www.unbelievable-machine.com/hadoop2/downloads/um-hp-whitepaper2014.pdf.
  2. Anderson, Ch. 2008. The End of Theory. The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete. WIRED Magazine June 23rd 2008, http://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
  3. Boeing, N. 2015. Wie berechenbar ist der Mensch? Technology Review 03/2015. http://www.heise.de/tr/artikel/Wie-berechenbar-ist-der-Mensch-2599601.html.
  4. Bullinger, H.-J., and K. Kornwachs. 1990. Expertensysteme – Anwendungen und Auswirkungen im Produktionsbetrieb. München: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
  5. Grunwald, A., K. Kornwachs et al. 2012. Technikzukünfte. Vorausdenken – Erstellen – Bewerten. In acatech IMPULS, ed. Acatech. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2012. http://www.acatech.de/de/publikationen/impuls/acatech-impuls/detail/artikel/technikzukuenfte-vorausdenken-erstellen-bewerten.html.
  6. Grzanna, M. 2015. Der Orwell’sche Bürger. Technology Review 2.7. 2015. http://www.heise.de/tr/artikel/Der-Orwell-sche-Buerger-2663947.html.
  7. Gumbrecht, H.-U. 2014. Das Denken muss nun auch den Daten folgen. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Feuilleton 12.3. 2014. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/geisteswissenschaften/neue-serie-das-digitale-denken-das-denken-muss-nun-auch-den-daten-folgen-12840532.html
  8. Hofstetter, Y. 2014. Sie wissen alles – wie intelligente Maschinen in unser Leben eindringen und warum wir für unsere Freiheit kämpfen müssen. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I. 1956. Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
  10. Keller, U., and S. Kluge. 1999. Vom Einzelfall zum Typus – Fallvergleich und Fallkontrastierung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.Google Scholar
  11. Klir, G.J. 1976. Identification of Generative Structures in Empirical Data. International Journal of General Systems 3, 89-104.Google Scholar
  12. Klir, G.J. 1985. The Architecture of Systems Problem Solving. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. Klir, G.J., M. Pitarelli, M. Mariano, and K. Kornwachs. 1988. The Potentiality of Reconstructability Analysis for Production Research. International Journal for Production Research 26, 629645.Google Scholar
  14. Kornwachs, K. 1999. Von der Information zum Wissen? In Gene, Neurone, Qubits & Co. Unsere Welten der Information/Forschung-Technik-Mensch. Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Ärzte, 120. Versammlung, Berlin, 19.-22. September 1998, ed. D. Ganten et al., 35-44. Stuttgart: Hirzel.Google Scholar
  15. Kornwachs, K. 2001. Data - Information – Knowledge – A Trial for Technological Enlightenment. In Toward the Information Society – The Case of Central and Eastern European Countries. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung, Bd. 9., ed. G. Banse, C.J. Langenbach, P. Machleidt, 109-123. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Kornwachs, K. 2012. Strukturen technologischen Wissens. Analytische Studien zu einer Wissenschaftstheorie der Technik. Berlin: Edition Sigma 2012.Google Scholar
  17. Kornwachs, K. 2015. Short Reports and Impressions on the 3rd Sino-German i-City Workshop, Oct 29-30, 2014, Wuhan, China; submitted to the National Academy of Science and Engineering (acatech), Berlin, March 2015.Google Scholar
  18. Kornwachs, K. et al. 2013. Technikwissenschaften. Erkennen – Gestalten – Verantworten. In acatech IMPULS, ed. acatech. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. http://www.acatech.de/de/publikationen/impuls.html. English: Technological Sciences. Discovery – Design – Responsibility (2014).http://www.acatech.de/de/publikationen/impuls/acatech-impuls/detail/artikel/technological-science-discovery-design-responsibility.html.
  19. Lütge, G. 2014. Schnüffeln verboten – Facebook, Google, Apple: Ignorieren sie den Datenschutz? DIE ZEIT 19, S. 22.Google Scholar
  20. Mainzer, K. 2014. Die Berechnung der Welt – Von der Weltformel zu Big Data. München: Beck.Google Scholar
  21. Mayer-Schönberger, V. und K. Cukier. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
  22. Mortensen C. D. (ed.). 2008. Communication theory. 2nded. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publ.Google Scholar
  23. Neumann, W. L. 2005. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 6thed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  24. Norvig, P. 2008. All we want are the facts, ma’m. http://norvig.com/fact-check.html.
  25. Obama, B. 2014. Remarks on the Administration’s Review of Signals Intelligence from January 17, 2014. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-pressoffice/2014/01/17/remarks-president-review-signals-intelligence. Accessed November 2015.
  26. Palace, B. 1996. Data Mining. Technology Note prepared for Management 274A. Anderson Graduate School of Management at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Spring 1996. http://www.anderson.ucla.edu/faculty/jason.frand/teacher/technologies/palace/datamining.htm.
  27. Podesta, J. et al. 2014. Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, preserving Values. Executive Office of the President. White House: Washington. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_2014.pdf.
  28. Pope Francis. 2015. Encyclical Letter ‘Laudato Si’ of the Holy Father Francis on Care for our Common Home. Vatican Press, Vatican, Rome, May, 24th, 2015. http://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_en.pdf.
  29. Rauner, M. 2006. Die Merkels von nebenan. ZEIT Wissen 4, 36-41.Google Scholar
  30. Schulzki-Hadouti, Chr. 2015. Behauptete Sicherheiten. VDI Nachrichten 29/30, 11.Google Scholar
  31. Shannon, C.E., and W. Weaver. 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. 2nd ed. 1969. Chicago, London: Urbana. Deutsch: Mathematische Grundlagen der Informationstheorie. Munchen: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
  32. Stolz, M., and J. Block. 2012. Deutschlandkarte – 102 neue Wahrheiten. München: Knaur.Google Scholar
  33. Strutz T. 2011. Data Fitting and Uncertainty – A practical introduction to weighted least squares and beyond. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner.Google Scholar
  34. Tal, E. 2015. Measurement Science. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer Edition), ed. Edward N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/measurement-science/.
  35. Techopedia. 2015. What is the difference between big data and data mining? http://www.techopedia.com/7/29678/technology-trends/what-is-the-difference-between-big-data-and-data-mining.
  36. Witten, I. H., E. Frank, and M. A. Hall. 2011. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. 3rd ed. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  37. Yin, R. K. 2003. Case Study Research – Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Zwick, M. 2004. An Overview of Reconstructability Analysis. Kybernetes 33, 877-905. All web-page accesses checked on January, 10th 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität UlmUlmDeutschland

Personalised recommendations