Ethos, Eidos, Habitus A Social Theoretical Contribution to Morality and Ethics

Chapter

Abstract

This essay sets out a practice theory perspective on morality and ethics within a Bourdieuan frame. The terms ethos and eidos are developed as field level accounts of morality – the normative character or structure of a society of culture – and ethics or, rather, the collective socio-logic of ethical thinking. I then discuss the idea that, consistent with Bourdieu’s social theory, social structures – such as ethos and eidos – are ontologically complicit with the systems of dispositions constitutive of habitus. Following my discussion of this idea – that the structures of habitus (systems of dispositions) stand in a homologous relationship with the structures of the social fields within which they were developed – I turn to some recent research in moral psychology. I attempt to show that the view I have outlined can assist us in understanding the picture of morality and ethics emerging from this scholarship.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon. Editorial. (2014). Characterology. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal of Reviews 43 (2), 149–154.Google Scholar
  2. Abend, G. (2010). What’s New and What’s Old about the New Sociology of Morality. In S. Hitlin & S. Vaisey (Eds.), Handbook of the Sociology of Morality (pp. 561–584). London, UK: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abend, G. (2013). What the Science of Morality Doesn’t Say About Morality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43 (2), 157–200.Google Scholar
  4. Adams, M. (2006). Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity. Sociology 40(3), 511–528.Google Scholar
  5. Alfano, M. (2013). Character as Moral Fiction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, A. (2005). The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Archer, M.S. (2003). Structure, Agency and the Internal Conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bateson, G. (1958). Naven: A Survey of the Problems Suggested by a Composite Picture of the Culture of a New Guinea Tribe Drawn from Three Points of View. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1993). Sociology in Question. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1979). Public Opinion Does Not Exist. In A. Mattelart & S. Siegelau (Eds.), Communication and Class Struggle: An Anthology (pp. 124–130). New York, USA: International General.Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P. (1981). Men and Machines. In K. Knorr-Cetina & A.V. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology (pp. 304–317). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1992a). The Logic of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (1992b). Towards a Policy of Morality in Politics. In W.R. Shea & A. Spadafora (Eds.), From the Twilight of Probability. Canton: Science History Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (1996a). On the Family as a Realized Category. Theory Culture and Society 13 (3), 19–26.Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (1996b). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Reprint. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Scattered Remarks. European Journal of Social Theory 2 (3), 334–340.Google Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, P. (2002). Habitus. In J. Hillier & E. Rooksby (Eds), Habitus: A Sense of Place (pp. 43–49). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.C. (2000). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. 2nd Edition. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Brubaker, R. (1993). Social Theory as Habitus. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (pp. 212–234). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Carlisle, C. (2013). The Question of Habit in Theology and Philosophy: From Hexis to Plasticity. Body & Society 19 (2–3), 30–57.Google Scholar
  25. Carlisle, C. (2010). Between Freedom and Necessity: Félix Ravaisson on Habit and the Moral Life. Inquiry 53 (2), 123–145.Google Scholar
  26. Christman, J. (2009). The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-Historical Selves. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cushman, F., Young, L. & Greene, J.D. (2010). Multi-System Moral Psychology. In J. Doris (Ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Doris, J.M. (2002). Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edel, M., & Edel, A. (2000). Anthropology and Ethics: The Quest for Moral Understanding. London, UK: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Emmerich, N. (2013). Medical Ethics Education: An Interdisciplinary and Social Theoretical Perspective. London, UK: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Emmerich, N. (2014). Bourdieu’s Collective Enterprise of Inculcation: The Moral Socialisation and Ethical Enculturation of Medical Students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, Online First.Google Scholar
  33. Fassin, D. (Ed.) (2012). A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Fassin, D., & Lézé, S. (Eds.) (2013). Moral Anthropology: A Critical Reader. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Foucault, M. (2003). The Birth of the Clinic. New Ed. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Fuller, S. (2012). Precautionary and Proactionary as the New Right and the New Left of the Twenty-First Century Ideological Spectrum. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 25 (4), 157–174.Google Scholar
  37. Fuller, S., & Lipinska, V. (2014). The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Geertz, C. (1957). Ethos, World-View and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols. The Antioch Review 17 (4), 421.Google Scholar
  39. Gellner, E. (1992). Reason and Culture: A Sociological and Philosophical Study of the Role of Rationality and Rationalism. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  40. Gilligan, C. (1993). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Gregg, B. (2003). Thick Moralities, Thin Politics: Social Integration Across Communities of Belief. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Haidt, J. (2001). The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment. Psychological Review 108(4), 814–834.Google Scholar
  43. Haidt, J. (2012). The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  44. Haidt, J., Bjorklund, F. & Murphy, S. (2000). Moral Dumbfounding: When Intuition Finds No Reason. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Virginia. http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Haidt-Moral-Dumfounding-When-Intuition-Finds-No-Reason.pdf
  45. Hämäläinen, N. (2009). Is Moral Theory Harmful in Practice? – Relocating Anti-Theory in Contemporary Ethics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12(5), 539–553.Google Scholar
  46. Harman, G. (2009). Skepticism about Character Traits. The Journal of Ethics 13 (2–3), 235–242.Google Scholar
  47. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of the Sociology of Morality. London, UK: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Ignatow, G. (2009). Why the Sociology of Morality Needs Bourdieu’s Habitus. Sociological Inquiry 79 (1), 98–114.Google Scholar
  49. Jenkins, R. (1982). Pierre Bourdieu and the Reproduction of Determinism. Sociology 16(2), 270–278.Google Scholar
  50. Johnson, M. (2014). Morality for Humans: Ethical Understanding from the Perspective of Cognitive Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  52. Kleinman, A. (1995). Writing at the Margin: Discourse between Anthropology and Medicine. Berkley, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  53. Knobe, J. (2003). Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language. Analysis 63 (3), 190–194.Google Scholar
  54. Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development. Vol. 1. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  55. Kolodny, N. (1996). The Ethics of Cryptonormativism: A Defense of Foucault’s Evasions. Philosophy & Social Criticism 22 (5), 63–84.Google Scholar
  56. Kroeber, A.L. (1963). Anthropology. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  57. Kukla, R. (2014a). Living with Pirates: Common Morality and Embodied Practice. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1), 75–85.Google Scholar
  58. Kukla, R. (2014b). Response to Strong and Beauchamp: At World’s End. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 23 (1), 99–103.Google Scholar
  59. Lahire, B. (2010). The Plural Actor. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  60. Laidlaw, J. (2013). The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lizardo, O. (2004). The Cognitive Origins of Bourdieu’s Habitus. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4), 375–401.Google Scholar
  62. Luke, H. (2003). Medical Education and Sociology of Medical Habitus: “It’s Not About the Stethoscope!” Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  63. Lynch, M. (2001). Ethnomethodology and the Logic of Practice. In T.R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp. 131–48). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  64. Madge, C. (1964). Society in the Mind: Elements of Social Eidos. London, UK: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  65. Martin, P.J., & Dennis, A. (Eds.) (2010). Human Agents and Social Structures. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Meisenhelder, T. (2006). From Character to Habitus in Sociology. The Social Science Journal 43 (1), 55–66.Google Scholar
  67. Mol, A. (2008). The Logic of Care: The Problem of Patient Choice. London, UK: Routledge. Nederman, C. J. (1989). Nature, Ethics, and the Doctrine of ‘Habitus’: Aristotelian Moral Psychology in the Twelfth Century. Traditio 45: 87–110.Google Scholar
  68. Noble, G., & Watkins, M. (2003). So, How Did Bourdieu Learn To Play Tennis? Habitus, Consciousness and Habituation. Cultural Studies 17 (3), 520–539.Google Scholar
  69. Pettit, D., & Knobe, J. (2009). The Pervasive Impact of Moral Judgment. Mind & Language 24 (5), 586–604.Google Scholar
  70. Polanyi, M. (2009). The Tacit Dimension. Reissue. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Ravaisson, F. (2008). Of Habit. (trans. C. Carlisle & M. Sinclair). London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
  72. Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s All Becoming a Habitus’: Beyond the Habitual Use of Habitus in Educational Research. British Journal of Sociology of Education 25 (4), 431–444.Google Scholar
  73. Rust, J, & Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). The Moral Behavior of Ethicists and the Power of Reason. In H. Sarkissian & J. Wright (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology (pp. 91–109). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  74. Sayer, A. (2010). Reflexivity and the Habitus. In M.S. Archer (Ed.), Conversations about Reflexivity (pp. 108–22). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Schüklenk, U., & Pacholczyk, A. (2010). Dignity’s Wooly Uplift. Bioethics 24 (2), ii.Google Scholar
  76. Schwitzgebel, E. (2009). Do Ethicists Steal More Books? Philosophical Psychology 22 (6), 711–725.Google Scholar
  77. Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). Do Ethics Classes Influence Student Behavior? University of California, Riverside. http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/EthicsClasses.htm
  78. Schwitzgebel, E, & Cushman, F. (2012). Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers. Mind & Language 27 (2), 135–153.Google Scholar
  79. Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2009). The Moral Behaviour of Ethicists: Peer Opinion. Mind 118(472), 1043–1059.Google Scholar
  80. Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2010). Do Ethicists and Political Philosophers Vote More Often Than Other Professors? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1(2), 189–199.Google Scholar
  81. Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (Forthcoming). The Moral Behaviour of Ethicists. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), Blackwell Companion to Experimental Philosophy. http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~eschwitz/SchwitzAbs/EthBehBlackwell.htm
  82. Sfard, A. (2010). Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Sinclair, S. (1997). Making Doctors: An Institutional Apprenticeship. Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  84. Smith, R. (2007). Being Human: Historical Knowledge and the Creation of Human Nature. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Sripada, C.S., & Konrath, S. (2011). Telling More Than We Can Know About Intentional Action. Mind & Language 26 (3), 353–380.Google Scholar
  86. Strauss, C., & Quinn, N. (1998). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Taylor, C. (1993). To Follow a Rule. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu:Critical Perspectives (pp. 45–60). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  88. Thompson, P. (2012). Field. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts, 2nd Ed. (pp. 67–81). Stocksfield, UK: Acumen Publishing.Google Scholar
  89. Toulmin, S.E. (1972). Human Understanding. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. 4th Ed. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  91. Webber, J. (2006). Virtue, character and situation. Journal of Moral Philosophy 3(2), 193–213.Google Scholar
  92. Wolff, J. (1998). Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos. Philosophy & Public Affairs 27(2), 97–122.Google Scholar
  93. Zahle, J. (2013). Practices and the Direct Perception of Normative States: Part I. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 43(4), 493–518.Google Scholar
  94. Zahle, J. (2014). Practices and the Direct Perception of Normative States: Part II. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44(1), 74–85.Google Scholar
  95. Zigon, J. (2008). Morality: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford, UK: Berg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Visiting Research Fellow, School of Politics, International Studies and PhilosophyQueen’s University BelfastBelfastU.K.

Personalised recommendations