Advertisement

Data Dissemination, Documentation, and User Support

  • Jan SkopekEmail author
  • Knut Wenzig
  • Daniel Bela
  • Tobias Koberg
  • Manuel Munz
  • Daniel Fuß
Chapter

Abstract

A major goal of the NEPS is to provide scientific use data to the international research community. For this purpose, the NEPS has set up a Research Data Center (RDC) that offers a comprehensive portfolio of services, allowing researchers to gain access to and work with NEPS data effectively. The RDC’s support concept combines well-known approaches with innovative means of data documentation, data dissemination, and user support. Important building blocks of our dissemination strategy include the provision of (a) user-friendly and edited scientific use data, (b) flexible data access to the scientific community, (c) sufficient, easy-to-obtain, and clearly arranged documentation of NEPS surveys and data, and (d) extensive user support fostering good scientific practices and high-quality educational research. To achieve the highest standards in publishing panel data, the RDC has established a powerful infrastructure for data management, data dissemination, data documentation, and user support. In this chapter, we discuss the core elements of our concept.

Keywords

Data Access Data Dissemination Occupational Prestige User Support Important Building Block 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aßmann, C., Steinhauer, H. W., Kiesl, H., Koch, S., Schönberger, B., Müller-Kuller, A., … Blossfeld, H.-P. (2011). Sampling designs of the National Educational Panel Study: Challenges and solutions. In H.-P. Blossfeld, H.-G. Roßbach, & J. von Maurice (Eds.), Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14. Education as a lifelong process: The German National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) (pp. 51 – 65). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  2. Bela, D. (2013, July). Provide, enrich and make accessible. Using Stata’s capabilities for dissemination NEPS Scientific Use Data. Presented at the meeting of German Stata Users Group, Potsdam.Google Scholar
  3. Blossfeld, H.-P. (1985). Bildungsexpansion und Berufschancen: Empirische Analysen zur Lage der Berufsanfänger in der Bundesrepublik. Frankfurt, New York: Campus.Google Scholar
  4. DESTATIS (2008). Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige. Mit Erläuterungen. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  5. Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), pp. 341 – 415.Google Scholar
  7. Ganzeboom, H. (2010). Questions and answers about ISEI-08. Retrieved from http://home.fsw.vu.nl/hbg.ganzeboom/isco08/qa-isei-08.htm
  8. Ganzeboom, H., de Graaf, P. M., Treiman, D. J., & de Leeuw, J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
  9. ILO (2008). International Standard Classification of Occupations. Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  10. Skopek, J. (2013). Starting Cohort 6: Adult Education and Lifelong Learning. (NEPS Technical Report No. 3.0.1). Retrieved from https://www.neps-data.de/de-de/datenzentrum/forschungsdaten/startkohorteerwachsene.aspx
  11. Paulus, W., Schweitzer, R., & Wiemer, S. (2010). Klassifikation der Berufe 2010. Entwicklung und Ergebnis (Methodenbericht der Statistik der Bundesagentur für Arbeit). Nürnberg: Bundesagentur für Arbeit.Google Scholar
  12. Schimpl-Neimanns, B. (2003). Umsetzung der Berufsklassifikation von Blossfeld auf die Mikrozensen 1973–1998 (ZUMA-Methodenbericht 2003/10). Mannheim: ZUMA.Google Scholar
  13. Wegener, B. (1985). Gibt es Sozialprestige ? Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 14(3), pp. 209–235.Google Scholar
  14. Wenzig, K. (2012). NEPS-Daten mit DOIs referenzieren. (RatSWD Working Paper Series No. 202). Retrieved from http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps202
  15. Zinn, S. (2013). Replication weights for the cohort samples of students in grade 5 and 9 in the National Educational Panel Study. (NEPS Working Paper No. 27). Bamberg: University of Bamberg, National Educational Panel StudyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Skopek
    • 1
    Email author
  • Knut Wenzig
    • 2
  • Daniel Bela
    • 3
  • Tobias Koberg
    • 3
  • Manuel Munz
    • 4
  • Daniel Fuß
    • 3
  1. 1.FlorenzItalien
  2. 2.BerlinDeutschland
  3. 3.BambergDeutschland
  4. 4.ErlangenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations