Advertisement

Measuring Personality Traits of Young Children— Results From a NEPS Pilot Study

  • Doreen MüllerEmail author
  • Tobias Linberg
  • Michael Bayer
  • Thorsten Schneider
  • Florian Wohlkinger
Chapter

Abstract

Measuring the Big Five personality traits is part of the research program in different starting cohorts of the National Educational Panel Study (NEPS). The Big Five are usually measured through self-ratings via self-administered questionnaires. However, children of preschool age cannot easily report on their self-concept in a sufficient way, even when more extensive research settings are applied. Studies using parental and teacher ratings show that the Big Five can capture individual differences in the behavioral tendencies of children (Digman, 1990; Mervielde, 2005; Weinert, Asendorpf, Beelmann, Doil, & Frevert, 2007), but there are no short survey versions of the Big Five for parental ratings that are done via telephone interviewing. In order to obtain data on the Big Five of five-year-old children in the NEPS, we used a bipolar 10-item scale and asked parents and Kindergarten teachers to rate the children. Since the parents answered questions in computer-assisted telephone interviews (CATI), we adapted the items to this mode of surveying. In order to gather information on measuring the Big Five in this bipolar rating scale via telephone interviews, we conducted cognitive interviews with n = 15 parents and then tested two different versions within a split-half design in a pilot study (with total n = 89 parents). This paper presents results from cognitive interviews on parents’ abilities to rate their children’s behavior in this way. We compare the results of the two versions applied in the pilot study as well as the ratings of Kindergarten teachers and parents. Finally, our paper draws conclusions on the measurement of personality traits of young children within the NEPS.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asendorpf, J. B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Validity of big five personality judgments in childhood: A 9 year longitudinal study. European Journal of Personality, 17(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417 – 440.Google Scholar
  3. Hofstee, W. K. B. (2003). Structures of personality traits. In T. Millon, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 231 – 254). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Kohnstamm, G. A., Mervielde, I., Besevegis, E., & Halverson, C. F. (1995). Tracing the big five in parents’ free descriptions of their children. European Journal of Personality, 9(4), 283 – 304.Google Scholar
  5. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.Google Scholar
  6. Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the big five dimensions ? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 90–106.Google Scholar
  7. Mervielde, I. (2005). Persönlichkeitsbeurteilung aus entwicklungspsychologischer Perspektive. In J. B. Asendorpf (Ed.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Themenbereich C: Google Scholar
  8. Theorie und Forschung. Serie V: Entwicklungspsychologie (pp. 563 – 616). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  9. Mervielde, I., Buyst, V., & de Fruyt, F. (1995). The validity of the big-five as a model for teachers’ ratings of individual differences among children aged 4–12 years. Personality and Individual Differences, 18(4), 525 – 534.Google Scholar
  10. Prüfer, P., & Rexroth, M. (2005). Kognitive Interviews (ZUMA How-to-Reihe No. 15). Mannheim: Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen.Google Scholar
  11. Schlechter, S., Blair, J., & Hey, J. V. (1996). Conducting cognitive interviews to test selfadministered and telephone surveys: Which methods should we use ? In American Statistical Association (Ed.), Proceedings of the survey research methods section (pp. 10–17). Alexandria, V. A.: American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  12. Weinert, S., Asendorpf, J. B., Beelmann, A., Doil, H., & Frevert, S. (Eds.). (2007). Expertise zur Erfassung von psychologischen Personmerkmalen bei Kindern im Alter von fünf Jahren im Rahmen des SOEP (DIW Data Documentation No. 20). Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  13. Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive interviewing: A tool for improving questionnaire design. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Doreen Müller
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tobias Linberg
    • 1
  • Michael Bayer
    • 1
  • Thorsten Schneider
    • 2
  • Florian Wohlkinger
    • 3
  1. 1.BambergDeutschland
  2. 2.LeipzigDeutschland
  3. 3.MünchenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations