Vergebung und Restorative Justice

Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Im dem Beitrag wird diskutiert, welche Rolle die Vergebung bei der kriminaljustiziell veranlassten Versöhnung – etwa im Rahmen eines Täter-Opfer-Ausgleiches – spielt. Aus psychologischer, philosophischer und pragmalinguistischer Sicht wird beleuchtet, was Vergebung eigentlich ist. Schließlich wird erörtert, inwiefern die Figur der Vergebung dem Anliegen einer als heilsam angesehenen Restorative Justice inhaltlich zu entsprechen vermag und welche kritischen Aspekte hierbei zu berücksichtigen sind.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ahmed, E. & Braithwaite, J. (2005). Forgiveness, Shaming, Shame and Bullying. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 38, 298-323.Google Scholar
  2. Allers, C. R. (2010). Undoing what has been done: Arendt and Levinas on forgiveness. In C. R. Allers & M. Smit (Hrsg.), Forgiveness in perspective (S. 19-42). Amsterdam u.a.: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  3. Allers, C. R. & Smit, M. (2010). Putting forgiveness in perspective, In: C. R. Allers & M. Smit (Hrsg.), Forgiveness in perspective (S. ix-xviii). Amsterdam u.a.: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  4. Balkin, R., Harris, N., Freeman, S. & Huntington, S. (2014). The Forgiveness Reconciliation Inventory. Measurement and Evaluation in counseling and development 47, 3-13.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, C. (2008). The apology ritual: A philosophical theory of punishment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, M. (2010). Vengefulness as a discredited emotion. In I. Urlić, M. Berger & A. Berman (Hrsg.), Victimhood, vengefulness, and the culture of forgiveness (S. 61-84). New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  7. Blustein, J. M. (2014). Forgiveness and remembrance: Remembering wrongdoing in personal and public life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bolivar, D., Aertsen, I. & Vanfrauchem, I. (2013). The ritual of apology and restorative justice: exploring the victim’s perspective. In D. Cuypers, D. Janssen, J. Haers & B. Segaert (Hrsg.), Public apology between ritual and regret (S. 123-145). Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi E. V.Google Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, J. (2009). Restorative Justice. In H.-J. Schneider (Hrsg.), Internationales Handbuch der Kriminologie, Bd 2, Besondere Probleme der Kriminologie (S. 497-506). Berlin u. a.: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, K. (2003). Making variation a virtue: evaluating the potential and limits of restorative justice. In E. Weitekamp & H. J. Kerner (Hrsg.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (S. 23-50). Portland, Oregon: Willan.Google Scholar
  11. Dickey, W. J. (1998). Forgiveness and crime: the possibilities of restorative justice. In R. D. Enright & J. North (Hrsg.), Exploring forgiveness (S. 106-120). Madison: The Universtity of Winsconsin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dürr, T. (2009). Hannah Arendts Begriff des Verzeihens. Freiburg: Karl Alber.Google Scholar
  13. Enright, R. D. (2008). Forgiveness as a choice. A step-by-step process for resolving anger and restoring hope. Washington D. C.: American Psychological association.Google Scholar
  14. Enright, R. D., Rique, J. & Coyle, C. T. (2004). Enright Forgiveness Inventory (EFI). Menlo Park, Ca: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  15. Field, C., Zander, J. & Hall, G. (2013). „Forgiveness is a present to yourself as well“: An intrapersonal model of forgiveness in victims of violent crime. International Journal of Victimology 19, 235-247.Google Scholar
  16. Galaway, B., Hudson, J., Maxwell, G. & Morris, A. (1996). Introduction to family group conferences. In B. Galaway et al. (Hrsg.), Restorative Justice: International perspectives (S. 1-16). Monsey, NY, Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  17. Giner-Sorolla, R., Kamau, C. W. & Castano, E. (2010). Guilt and shame through recipients eyes: the moderating effects of blame. Social psychology 41, 88-92.Google Scholar
  18. Gollwitzer, M. & Rothmund, T. (2011). What exactly are victim-sensitive persons sensitive to? Journal of research in personality 45, 448-455.Google Scholar
  19. Govier, T. (2002). Forgiveness and revenge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Hamel, S. (2009). Strafen als Sprechakt. Die Bedeutung der Strafe für das Opfer. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  21. Hieronymi, P. (2001). Articulating an uncompromising forgiveness. Philosophy and phenomenological research 62, 529-555.Google Scholar
  22. Hinton, S. (2009). Street children in Sierra Leone who forgive those who physically and sexually abuse them. A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.Google Scholar
  23. Houser, R. E. (Hrsg.) (2009). Forgiveness. Houston, TX: National Office of the American Catholic Philosophical Association, University of Saint Thomas.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson (2001). The Japanese way of justice. Prosecuting crime in Japan. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johnstone, G. (2011). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Klocke, G. (2011). Die Auflage “Entschuldigung”. Geschichte und Anwendung einer Sprechaktsanktion. aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur 6, 249-264.Google Scholar
  27. Klocke, G. (2013). Entschuldigung und Entschuldigungsannahme im Täter-Opfer-Ausgleich. Eine soziolinguistische Untersuchung zu Gesprächsstrukturen und Spracheinstellungen. München: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Lansky, M. R. (2001). Hidden shame, working through, and the problem of forgiveness in the tempest. Journal of the American Psychological Association 49, 1005-1033.Google Scholar
  29. Larocco, S. (2010). A qiet assault on the malicious. In C. R. Allers & M. Smit (Hrsg.), Forgiveness in perspective (S. 3-18). Amsterdam u.a.: Editions Rodopi.Google Scholar
  30. Leys, C., Licata, L., Bernard, P. & Marchal, C. (2012). The effects of offenders’ emotions versus behaviours on victims’ perception of their personality. Disentangling the effects of felt guilt and apologies. Swiss Journal of Psychology 71, 187-197.Google Scholar
  31. Maxwell, G. & Morris, A. (2012). The role of shame, guilt and remorse in restorative justice processes for young people. In H.-J. Kerner & E. Weitekamp (Hrsg.), Restorative Justice: Theoretical foundations (S. 267-284). Portland, Oregon: Willan.Google Scholar
  32. McCullough, M. E., Pargament, K. I. & Thoresen, C. E. (1999). Forgiveness. Theory, research and practice. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. o. Autor (2014). Victim Offender Dialogue Program. Vermont. Department of corrections. Agency of human Services. http://www.doc.state.vt.us/victim-services/the-victim-services-program-of-the-vermont-department-of-corrections/vodp/vod-faq#what. Zugegriffen: 31. Juli 2014.
  34. Rehbein, J. (1975). Entschuldigung und Rechtfertigungen, In D. Wunderlich (Hrsg.). Linguistische Pragmatik. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  35. Retzinger, S. & Scheff, T. (1996). Strategy for community conferences: emotions and social bonds. In B. Galaway et al. (Hrsg.), Restorative Justice: International perspectives (S. 315-336). Monsey, NY, Criminal Justice Press. Schwennen, C. (2008). Verzeihen. In A. E. Auhagen (Hrsg.), Positive Psychologie. 2. Aufl. (S. 150-165). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  36. Stubbs, J. (2007). Beyond apology? Domestic violence and critical questions for restorative justice. Criminology and criminal justice 7, 169-187.Google Scholar
  37. Umbreit, M. S., Bradshaw, W. & Coates, R. B. (2003). Victims of severe violence in dialogue with the offender: key principles, practices, outcomes and implications. In E. Weitekamp & H. J. Kerner (Hrsg.), Restorative justice in context: International practice and directions (S. 123-144). Portland, Oregon: Willan.Google Scholar
  38. Worthington, E. L. Jr. (2009). A just forgiveness. The art and science of forgiving. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RegensburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations