Advertisement

Kultivierungseffekte im Gesundheitsbereich

  • Cordula NitschEmail author
Chapter

Zusammenfassung

Der Kultivierungsansatz untersucht den langfristigen Einfluss des Fernsehens auf die Realitätsvorstellungen und Einstellungen der Rezipientinnen und Rezipienten. Im vorliegenden Beitrag werden zunächst die Grundannahmen des Ansatzes skizziert und dann ein Überblick über den Forschungsstand zu Kultivierungseffekten im Gesundheitsbereich gegeben. Dabei wird unterschieden nach Studien zum Ärztebild, zu Ernährung und Körperbild, zu Genuss- bzw. Suchtmitteln und zu Krankheiten.

Schlüsselwörter

Kultivierung Fernsehen Message System Analysis Cultivation Analysis Gesundheit und Krankheit 

Literatur

  1. Bryant, J., & Miron, D. (2004). Theory and research in mass communication. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 662–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho, H., Wilson, K., & Choi, J. (2011). Perceived realism of television medical dramas and perceptions about physicians. Journal of Media Psychology, 23(3), 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chory-Assad, R. M., & Tamborini, R. (2001). Television doctors: An analysis of physicians on fictional and non-fictional television programs. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45(3), 499–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chory-Assad, R. M., & Tamborini, R. (2003). Television exposure and the public’s perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47(2), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung, J. E. (2014). Medical dramas and viewer perception of health: Testing cultivation effects. Human Communication Research, 40(3), 333–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Diefenbach, D. L., & West, M. D. (2007). Television and attitudes toward mental health issues: Cultivation analysis and the third-person effect. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(2), 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dixon, H. G., Scully, M. L., Wakefield, M. A., White, V. M., & Crawford, D. A. (2007). The effects of television advertisements for junk food versus nutritious food on children’s food attitudes and preferences. Social Science & Medicine, 65(7), 1311–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Egbert, N., & Belcher, J. D. (2012). Reality bites: An investigation of the genre of reality television and its relationship to viewers’ body image. Mass Communication and Society, 15(3), 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Engel, B., & Breunig, C. (2015). Massenkommunikation 2015: Mediennutzung im Intermediavergleich. Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Langzeitstudie. Media Perspektiven (7–8), 310–322.Google Scholar
  10. Gehrau, V. (2014). Kultivierung von Berufsvorstellungen durch Fernsehen bei Jugendlichen. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 62(3), 417–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerbner, G., & Ozyegin, N. (1997). Alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs in entertainment television, commercials, news, „reality shows“, movies, and music channels. Princeton: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.Google Scholar
  13. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorelli, N. (1980). The ‚Mainstreaming‘ of America. Violence profile no. 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1981). Health and medicine on television. New England Journal of Medicine, 305(15), 901–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982a). What television teaches about physicians and health. Mobius: A Journal for Continuing Education Professionals in Health Sciences, 2(2), 44–51.Google Scholar
  16. Gerbner, G., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982b). Programming health portrayals: What viewers see, say and do. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet & J. Lazar (Hrsg.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the 80’s (S. 291–307). Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. Grontved, A., & Hu, F. B. (2011). Television viewing and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. JAMA, 305(23), 2448–2455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, K. (2005). Is „fat free“ good for me? A panel study of television viewing and children’s nutritional knowledge and reasoning. Health Communication, 17(2), 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hetsroni, A. (2009). If you must be hospitalized, television is not the place: Diagnoses, survival rates and demographic characteristics of patients in TV hospital dramas. Communication Research Reports, 26(4), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hetsroni, A. (2014). Ceiling effect in cultivation. General TV viewing, genre-specific viewing and estimates of health concerns. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaufman, L. (1980). Prime-time nutrition. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, C.-J., & Niederdeppe, J. (2011). Genre-specific cultivation effects lagged associations between overall TV viewing, local TV news viewing, and fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention. Communication Research, 38(6), 731–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Long, J. A., O’Connor, P. G., Gerbner, G., & Concato, J. (2002). Use of alcohol, illicit drugs, and tobacco among characters on prime-time television. Substance Abuse, 23(2), 95–103.Google Scholar
  24. Lücke, S. (2007). Ernährung im Fernsehen. Eine Kultivierungsstudie zur Darstellung und Wirkung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  25. Manganello, J., & Blake, N. (2010). A study of quantitative content analysis of health messages in U.S. Media from 1985 to 2005. Health Communication, 25(5), 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCreary, D. R., & Sadava, S. W. (1999). Television viewing and self-perceived health, weight, and physical fitness: Evidence for the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(11), 2342–2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McLaughlin, J. (1975). The doctor shows. Journal of Communication, 25(3), 182–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minnebo, J., & Eggermont, S. (2007). Watching the young use illicit drugs. Direct experience, exposure to television and the stereotyping of adolescents’ substance use. Young, 15(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and meta-analysis. In B. R. Burleson & A. W. Kunkel (Hrsg.), Communication yearbook 20 (S. 1–45). Thousand Oaks et al: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (2010). The state of cultivation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2014). Cultivation theory. In T. L. Thompson (Hrsg.), Encyclopedia of health communication (S. 276–277). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  32. Nabi, R. L., & Sullivan, J. L. (2001). Does television viewing relate to engagement in protective action against crime? A cultivation analysis from a theory of reasoned action perspective. Communication Research, 28(6), 802–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neuendorf, K. (1990). Health images in the mass media. In E. B. Ray & L. Donohew (Hrsg.), Communication and health: Systems and applications (S. 111–135). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Niederdeppe, J., Fowler, E. F., Goldstein, K., & Pribble, J. (2010). Does local television news coverage cultivate fatalistic beliefs about cancer prevention? Journal of Communication, 60(2), 230–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pfau, M., Mullen, L. J., & Garrow, K. (1995). The influence of television viewing on public perceptions of physicians. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39(4), 441–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Potter, W. J. (1993). Cultivation theory and research: A conceptual critique. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 564–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quick, B. L. (2009). The effects of viewing grey’s anatomy on perceptions of doctors and patient satisfaction. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 53(1), 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Robinson, J. D., Thompson, T. L., Turner, J. W., Agne, R. R., & Tian, Y. (2013). Recent trends in research on health portrayals in the media. In A. N. Valdivia & S. R. Mazzarella (Hrsg.), The international encyclopedia of media studies. Content and representation (Bd. III, S. 463–483). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Rossmann, C. (2003). Zu Risiken und Nebenwirkungen fragen Sie die Patienten. Eine Studie zur Darstellung von Ärzten in Krankenhausserien und ihrem Einfluss auf das Arztbild von Patienten. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 51(3–4), 497–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rossmann, C. (2008). Fiktion Wirklichkeit. Ein Modell der Informationsverarbeitung im Kultivierungsprozess. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rossmann, C. (2013). Kultivierungsforschung. Idee, Entwicklung und Integration. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 207–223). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rossmann, C., & Brosius, H.-B. (2005). Vom hässlichen Entlein zum schönen Schwan? Zur Darstellung und Wirkung von Schönheitsoperationen im Fernsehen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 53(4), 507–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rossmann, C., & Ziegler, L. (2013). Gesundheitskommunikation: Medienwirkungen im Gesundheitsbereich. In W. Schweiger & A. Fahr (Hrsg.), Handbuch Medienwirkungsforschung (S. 385–400). Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Russell, C. A., & Buhrau, D. (2015). The role of television viewing and direct experience in predicting adolscents’ beliefs about the health risks of fast-food consumption. Appetite, 92, 200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russell, C. A., Russell, D. W., Boland, W. A., & Grube, J. W. (2014). Television’s cultivation of American adolescents’ beliefs about alcohol and the moderating role of trait reactance. Journal of Children & Media, 8(1), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scherr, S. (2014). Gesundheit in den Medien und die Bedeutung von Medieninhalten für die Gesundheit. In K. Hurrelmann & E. Baumann (Hrsg.), Handbuch Gesundheitskommunikation (S. 239–252). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  47. Shanahan, J., Scheufele, D., Fang, Y., & Hizi, S. (2004). Cultivation and spiral of silence effects: The case of smoking. Mass Communication & Society, 7(4), 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Signorielli, N. (1989). The stigma of mental illness on television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 33(3), 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Signorielli, N. (1993). Mass media images and impact on health: A sourcebook. Westport/London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  50. Signorielli, N., & Lears, M. (1992). Television and children’s conceptions of nutrition: Unhealthy messages. Health Communication, 4(4), 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Signorielli, N., & Staples, J. (1997). Television and children’s conceptions of nutrition. Health Communication, 9(4), 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Turow, J., & Coe, L. (1985). Curing television’s ills: The portrayal of health care. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van den Bulck, J. J. M. (2002). The impact of television fiction on public expectations of survival following inhospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by medical professionals. European Journal of Emergency Medicine, 9(4), 325–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Mierlo, J. (2009). Does watching television affect your fear of illness? A cultivation analysis. Conference Papers – International Communication Association. 2009 Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
  55. Vogel, D. L., Genitle, D. A., & Kaplan, S. A. (2008). The influence of television on willingness to seek therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 276–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wünsch, C., Nitsch, C., & Eilders, C. (2012). Politische Kultivierung am Vorabend. Ein prolonged-exposure-Experiment zur Wirkung der Fernsehserie „Lindenstraße“. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 60(2), 176–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für SozialwissenschaftenHeinrich-Heine-Universität DüsseldorfDüsseldorfDeutschland

Personalised recommendations