Managing Stakeholders for the Sake of Business and Society

Chapter
Part of the FOM-Edition book series (FOMEDITION)

Abstract

Since Freeman’s (Strategic management: A stakeholder approach, Pitman, Boston, 1984) seminal work on the stakeholder view of the firm, stakeholder management has become a much discussed concept in the business as well as in the academic world. In both realms, the call for integrating stakeholders into business decision-making has resonated widely. However, the transfer of elaborate concepts developed by academia into business practice poses a problem, and companies do not know how to address the complex issue of managing stakeholders successfully so that a benefit for the business and for the stakeholders is created. The theoretical and practical discussion of stakeholder management presented in this chapter aims to address this knowledge gap and thereby represents the missing link which is the focus of this chapter.

After an introduction, the theoretical foundation will be provided by discussing important elements and issues of stakeholder management. Of special importance are approaches on how to identify and integrate those stakeholders who are particularly relevant to the company. Thereafter, we will make a business case for stakeholder management in order to build the bridge to the practical part of the chapter. This leads to the crucial question of why companies should practice stakeholder management. In the practical part, we will explain how companies can go about implementing an effective stakeholder management and will also address mistakes which are frequently made. The chapter will close with a conclusion and an outlook on the future of stakeholder management.

References

  1. Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayuso, S., Rodríguez, M. A., & Ricart, J. E. (2006). Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas: A dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borga, F., Citterio, A., Noci, G., & Pizzurno, E. (2009). Sustainability report in small enterprises: Case studies in Italian furniture companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 162–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, M. M. (2003). Technology diffusion and the knowledge barrier: The dilemma of stakeholder participation. Public Performance and Management Review, 26(4), 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarkson, M. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117.Google Scholar
  8. Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it. Business and Society, 3(2), 210–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Lopez, T. T. (2001). Stakeholder management for conservation projects: A case study of Ream National Park, Cambodia 1. Environmental Management, 28(1), 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(1), 113–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferrell, O. C., Gonzalez-Padron, T. L., Hult, G. M. T., & Maignan, I. (2010). From market orientation to stakeholder orientation. Journal of Public Policy and the Market, 29(1), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fifka, M. S. (2012a). Brent Spar revisited—The impact of conflict and cooperation among stakeholders. In P. Kotler, A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, & J. Vanhamme (Eds.), A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: Pressures, conflicts, reconciliation (pp. 57–72). Farnham: Gower.Google Scholar
  13. Fifka, M. S. (2012b). The impact of socio-economic and political factors on stakeholder dialogues in Germany, France, and the United States. In P. Kotler, A. Lindgreen, F. Maon, & J. Vanhamme (Eds.), A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: Pressures, conflicts, reconciliation (pp. 3–22). Farnham: Gower.Google Scholar
  14. Fifka, M. S. (2013a). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fifka, M. S. (2013b). The irony of stakeholder management in Germany—The difficulty of implementing an essential concept for CSR. UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 21(1), 113–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman. (Reprinted in 2010, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, R. E., & McVea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. S. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 189–207). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 93–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.Google Scholar
  21. Gjolberg, M. (2009). Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 10–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habisch, A., & Loza Adaui, C. R. (2013). A social capital approach towards social innovation. In T. Osburg & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Social innovation: Solutions for a sustainable future (pp. 65–74). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habisch, A., Patelli, L., Pedrini, M., & Schwartz, C. (2011). Different talks with different folks: A comparative survey of stakeholder dialogue in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harrison, J. S., & St. John, C. H. (1997). Strategic management of organizations and stakeholders. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Heugens, P. P. M. A. R., van den Bosch, F. A. J., & van Riel, C. B. M. (2002). Stakeholder integration—Building mutually enforcing relationships. Business & Society, 41(1), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, T. M., Felps, W., & Bigley, G. A. (2007). Ethical theory and stakeholder related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaler, J. (2002). Morality and strategy in stakeholder identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 39(1–2), 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamal, M., Weerakkody, V., & Irani, Z. (2011). Analyzing the role of stakeholders in the adoption of technology integration solutions in UK local government: An exploratory study. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 200–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaptein, M., & van Tulder, R. (2003). Toward effective stakeholder dialogue. Business and Society Review, 108(2), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, K. (2000). Semiotics in information systems engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Logsdon, J. M., & Yuthas, K. (1997). Corporate social performance, stakeholder orientation, and organizational moral development. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 1213–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Longo, M., & Mura, M. (2008). Stakeholder management and human resources: Development and implementation of a performance measurement system. Corporate Governance, 2, 191–213.Google Scholar
  33. Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maurer, M., & Sachs, S. (2005). Implementing the stakeholder view: Learning processes for changed stakeholder orientation. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.Google Scholar
  36. Morhardt, J. E. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the internet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 436–452.Google Scholar
  37. O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Models and theories in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Riordan, L., Jonker, J., & Marsh, N. (2013). The missing link in corporate responsibility: Connecting for sustainable growth. KCC White Paper 1, Essen. http://www.fom.de/fileadmin/fom/kc/kcc/KCC_White_Paper_1_ONLINE.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2014.
  39. Palazzo, B. (2010). An introduction to stakeholder dialogue. In M. Pohl & N. Tolhurst (Eds.), Responsible business: How to manage a CSR strategy successfully (pp. 17–42). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., de Burgos-Jiménez, J., & Carmona-Moreno, E. (2010). Measuring stakeholder integration: Knowledge, interaction and adaptational behavior dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(3), 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Podnar, K., & Jancic, Z. (2006). Towards a categorization of stakeholder groups: An empirical verification of a three-level model. Journal of Marketing Communications, 12(4), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Preble, J. F. (2005). Toward a comprehensive model of stakeholder management. Business and Society Review, 110(4), 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rueda-Manzanares, A., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2008). The influence of stakeholders on the environmental strategy of service firms: The moderating effects of complexity, uncertainty and munificence. British Journal of Management, 19(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Simmons, J., & Lovegrove, I. (2005). Bridging the conceptual divide: Lessons from stakeholder analysis. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18(5), 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tashman, P., & Raelin, J. (2013). Who and what really matters to the firm: Moving stakeholder salience beyond managerial perceptions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(4), 591–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Buren, H. (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 11(3), 481–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vilanova, L. (2007). Neither shareholder nor stakeholder management: What happens when firms are run for their short-term salient stakeholder? European Management Journal, 25(2), 146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vos, J. F. J. (2003). Corporate social responsibility and the identification of stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 141–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walsh, J. P. (2005). Book review essay: Taking stock of stakeholder management. Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wheeler, D., & Elkington, J. (2001). The end of the corporate environmental report? Or the advent of cybernetic sustainability reporting and communication? Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wheeler, D., & Sillanpää, M. (1997). The stakeholder corporation: A blueprint for maximising stakeholder value. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  56. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2010). The WBCSD’s approach to engagement. http://www.wbcsd.org/DocRoot/xxBp16bdV46Ui2JpR1CC/stakeholder.pdf. Accessed 14 Jan. 2014.

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität Erlangen-NürnbergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations