The Paradox of ‘Acting Globally While Thinking Locally’

Discordance in Climate Change Adaption Policy
Chapter

Abstract

One of the most notable stories in adopting strong, sweeping, and ambitious climate change mitigation policy in the United States is California’s AB32, the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (Guido, Cayan, Luers, Mahemann and Croes, 2008; Farrell & Hanemann, 2009). Enacted by a Democratic legislature and signed by a Republican governor, AB32 is exceptional in its comprehensiveness, goal setting, and bi-partisan support.

References

  1. Adaptation Advisory Panel to the State of California (2010). Preparing for the Effects of Climate Change – A Strategy for California, www.pacificcouncil.org
  2. Adger, W. N., Brooks, N., Bentham, G., Agnew, M., & Eriksen, S. (2004). New Indicators of Vulnerability and Adaptive Capacity. Technical Report 7, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research.Google Scholar
  3. Barbour, E., & Deakin, E.A. (2012). “Smart Growth Planning for Climate Protection: Evaluating California’s Senate Bill 375.” Journal of American Planning Association, 78 (1); 70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BCDC (2009). Living With a Rising Bay: Vulnerability and Adaptation in San Francisco Bay and on its Shoreline. San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission. April 9.Google Scholar
  5. Bardach, E. (1972). Skill Factor in Politics: Repealing the Mental Commitment Laws in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bardach, E. (1996). Barriers to Interagency Collaboration. In Kettle and Milward (Eds.). The State of Public Management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press. Pp. 168–192.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, S., Grover, H., Lindquist, E., & Vedlitz, A. (2010). Examining climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviours among public sector organizations in the USA. Local Environment, 15 (6); 591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bromirski, P. D., Miller, A.J., Flick, R.E., & Auad, G. (2011). Dynamical suppression of sea level rise along the Pacific coast of North America: Indications for imminent acceleration. Journal of Geophysical Research,116, CO7005, doi:10.1029/2010JC006759.Google Scholar
  9. California Department of Housing and Community Development (2009). Housing Element Policies and Programs Addressing Climate Change, http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/HE_PoliciesProgramsAddressingClimateChange.pdf
  10. California EPA (2010). Updated Economic Analysis of California’s Climate Change Scoping Plan Staff Report to the Air Resources Board, http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/economics-sp/economics-sp.htm
  11. California Secretary of State (2011). November 2, 2010 General Election – Statement of Vote, http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/sov/2010-general/California Natural Resources Agency (2010). California Climate Adaptation Strategy: 2010 Progress Report. http://www.energy.ca.gov/2010publications/CNRA-1000-2010-010/CNRA-1000-2010-010.PDF
  12. California Natural Resources Agency (2009). California Climate Adaptation Strategy. http://resources.ca.gov/climate_adaptation/docs/Statewide_Adaptation_Strategy.pdf
  13. Charles Rivers Associates (2010). Analysis of the California ARB’s Scoping Plan and Related Policy Insights, www.crai.com/uploadedFiles/analysis-of-ab32-scoping-plan.pdf.
  14. CO-CAT (2010). State of California Se-Level Rise Interim Guidance Document. The Coastal and Ocean Resources Working Group for the Climate Action Team, October; http://www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/project_pages/Climate/SLR_Guidance_Document.pdf
  15. Farber, D. A. (2009). Climate Adaptation and Federalism: Mapping the Issues. San Diego Journal of Climate and Energy Law, 1; 259–286.Google Scholar
  16. Farrell, A. E., & Hanemann, W. (2009). Field Notes on the Political Economy of California Climate Change Policy. Ch. 5, In Henrik Selin & Stacy VanDeveer (Eds.), Climates in North American Politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fernandez, S., & Raney, H. (2006). Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector. Public Administration Review. 66 (2); 168–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change; 253–267.Google Scholar
  19. GAO (2000). Barriers to Interagency Coordination. Report to the Honorable Fred Thompson, Chairman Committee on Governmental Affairs U.S. Senate March. GAO/GGD-00–106Google Scholar
  20. Gormley, W.T. (1986). Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System. Polity, 18 (4); 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guido, F., Cayan, D., Luers, A., Hanemann, M., & Croes, B. (2008). Linking climate change science with policy in California. Climate Change, 87 (Suppl 1); S7–S20.Google Scholar
  22. Hart, J.A., Grifman, P.M., Moser, S.C., Abeles, A., Myers, M.R., Schlosser, S.C., & Ekstrom, J.A. (2012). Rising to the Challenge: Results of the 2011 Coastal California Adaptation Needs Assessment. USCSG-TR-01-2012. https://www.usc.edu/org/seagrant/research/survey.html
  23. ICLEI (2012). Sea-Level Adaptation Strategy for the San Diego Bay. Prepared by ICLEI_Local Governments for Sustainability for the project’s Public Agency Steering Committee, with the support of The San Diego Foundation. January.Google Scholar
  24. Kates, R.W., Travis, W.R., & Wilbanks, T.J. (2012). Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. PNAS. 109 (19); 7156–7161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lempert, R., Jurgen, A., & Sprinz, D.F. (2009). Methods of Long-Term Environmental Policy Challenges. Global Environmental Politics. 9 (3), August….Google Scholar
  26. Linwood, P., King, P., Mohn, C., Webster. D.G., Vaughn, R., & Adams, P.N. (2011). Estimating the potential economic impacts of climate change on Southern California Beaches. Climate Change, 109 (Suppl 1); S277–S289.Google Scholar
  27. Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 54, No. 248.Google Scholar
  28. Mastrandrea, M.D., & Luers, A. L. (2012). Climate change in California: scenarios and approaches for adaptation. Climatic Change. 111 (1); 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mazmanian, D., Jurewitz, J. and Nelson, H. (2012). In Search of a Robust Strategy for Governing Climate Change Adaptation. Paper presented at The Governance of Adaptation – An International Symposium. Amsterdam, the Netherlands. March 22–23.Google Scholar
  30. Mazmanian, D., Jurewitz, J., & Nelson, H. (2008). When a Sub-National State Actor Confronts a Global Challenge: California Setting the Pace and Tone of U.S. Climate Change Policy. Journal of Environment and Development. Special Issue. 17 (4); 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moser, S. C., & Eckstrom, J.A. (2011). Taking ownership of climate change: participatory adaptation planning in two local case studies from California. Journal of Environmental Studies and Science (1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moser, S.C., & Ekstrom, J.A. (2010). A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. PNAS 107 (51); 22026–22031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mun, J. (2006). Real Options Analysis: Tools And Techniques for Valuing Strategic Investments And Decisions. NY: John Wiley and Sons. Committee on Sea Level Rise in California, Oregon, and Washington; Board on Earth Sciences and Resources; Ocean Studies Board; Division on Earth and Life Studies; National Research Council (2012). Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future, National Academies Press; http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13389.
  34. Nelson, H.T., Rose, A., Wei, D., Peterson, T., & Wennberg, J. (2012). Intergovernmental Climate Change Mitigation Policy: Theory and Outcomes. Journal of Public Policy.Google Scholar
  35. Press, D., & Mazmanian, D. (2010). Toward Sustainable Production, Ch 10. In Norman Vig and Michael Kraft, (Eds.), Environmental Policy in the Twenty-First Century. C.Q. Press.Google Scholar
  36. Potoski, M., & Prakash, A. (2009). A. Voluntary Programs: A Club Theory Perspective. Cambridge. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and the Environment (July 2012), pp13–19; http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_712MBS.pdf
  38. Savoie, D.J., & Peters, B.G. (1998). Programme Review in Canada and the United States. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development.Google Scholar
  39. Scism, L. (2011). Florida Bolsters Hurricane Coffers. Wall Street Journal. July 22, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904233404576460414027054614.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
  40. Tsuneki, H., & Shaw, R. (2011). Opportunities and Challenges for Incorporating Climate Change Threats into Disaster Risk Management Planning: A Case Study in Costa Rica, Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2(3); www.psocommons.org/rhcpp/
  41. Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision Making in Political Systems: Veto Players in Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, Multicameralism and Multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25;289–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tompkins, E.L., & Eakin, H. (2012). Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change. 22; 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vollman, T. (1996). The Transformation Imperative. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Mazmanian
    • 1
  • John Jurewitz
    • 2
  • Hal T. Nelson
    • 3
  1. 1.Ralph and Goldy Lewis HallUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesKalifornien/USA
  2. 2.Pomona CollegeClaremontKalifornien/USA
  3. 3.School of Politics and EconomicsClaremont Graduate UniversityClaremontKalifornien/USA

Personalised recommendations