Lebensphasen von Communities of Practice – Eine Fallstudie

  • Alexander BremEmail author
  • Maximilian Maier


Interdependencies between organizations are constantly increasing. Hence, more companies and employees are engaged in inter-organizational Communities of Practice (CoP). This paper focuses on the life cycle of such communities, using the case example of a German innovation network. For this reason, a literature review was undertaken to derive a conceptual life cycle model. Based on our research we found that the CoP life cycle model can be applied and extended with an additional phase identified in the case. Moreover, our results show that externally founded, interorganizational CoP can be successful as well, which is a fact that is mostly neglected in the literature on CoP. Further (especially quantitative) research is recommended to strengthen the theoretical background of CoP.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, G. L.;Lamont, B. T. (2003): Knowlege management systems and developing sustainable competitive advantage. In: Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(2), S. 142–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blois, K. J. (1980): Quasi-Integration as a Mechanism for Controlling External Dependencies. In: Management Decision, 18(1), S. 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S.;Duguid, P. (1991): Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. In: Organization Science, 2(1), S. 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. S.;Duguid, P. (1998): Organizing Knowledge. In: California Management Review, 40(3), S. 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, W. M.;Levinthal, D. A. (1990): Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. In: Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), S. 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gongla, P.;Rizzuto, C. R. (2001): Evolving communities of practice: IBM global services experience. In: IBM Syst. J., 40(4), S. 842–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kimble, C.;Hildreth, P. M. (2004): Communities of Practice: Going One Step Too Far? In: SSRN Journal, Onlineausgabe, Working Paper Series, am 18.09.2013 abgerufen unter Scholar
  8. Lave, J.;Wenger, E. (1991): Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Raisch, S.;Birkinshaw, J. (2008): Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. In: Journal of Management, 34(3), S. 375–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roberts, J. (2006): Limits to Communities of Practice. In: Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), S. 623–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Simyard, C.;West, J. (2008): Knowledge Networks and Geographic Locus of Control. In: Chesbrough, H.;Vanhaverbeke, W.;West, J. (Hrsg.): Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford, S. 220–241.Google Scholar
  12. Swan, J. A.;Scarbrough, H.;Robertson, M. (2002): The Construction of ’Communities of Practice’ in the Management of Innovation. In: Management Learning, 33(4), S. 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sydow, J. (2005): Strategische Netzwerke. Evolution und Organisation, 6. Aufl., Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
  14. van Baalen, P.;Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.;van Heck, E. (2005): Knowledge Sharing in an Emerging Network of Practice: The Role of a Knowledge Portal. In: European Management Journal, 23(3), S. 300–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wenger, E. (1998): Communities of Practice: Learning as a Social System. In: Systems Thinker, 9(5), S. 1–11.Google Scholar
  16. Wenger, E. (1999): Communities of practice. Learning, meaning, and identity. 1. Aufl. Cambridge, U.K, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Yang, C.-L.;Wei, S.-T. (2010): Modelling the performance of CoP in knowledge management. In: Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(10), S. 1033–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yin, R. K. (1994): Case study research. Design and methods, 2. Aufl., Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
  19. Zboralski, K. (2007): Wissensmanagement durch Communities of Practice. Eine empirische Untersuchung von Wissensnetzwerken, Wiesbaden, zugleich Dissertation an der Technischen Universität Berlin 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-NürnbergNürnbergDeutschland

Personalised recommendations