Islam in Europe: Cross-National Differences in Accommodation and Explanations

  • Ines MichalowskiEmail author
  • Marian Burchardt
Part of the Islam und Politik book series (ISPO)


The aim of this volume was to provide insights into how Islam as a non-Christian immigrant religion is integrated into European societies. Rather than looking at indicators of individual integration and well-being among Muslims in Europe, we took an institutional perspective on this question by analyzing how European public institutions, legal and political systems, Muslim organizations and representatives, as well as other actors from civil society and the religious field have reacted to the change in Europe’s religious landscape that was driven by immigration from countries with Muslim majorities. As the institutions of the immigration countries have been shaped mainly against the backdrop of Christianity as the majority religion, the implantation of a new faith group raises the question whether and to what extent present institutional arrangements are to be renegotiated.


Muslim Community Religious Freedom Halal Food Supranational Institution Muslim Immigrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bertossi, C., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2012). National models of immigrant integration: The costs for comparative research. Comparative European Politics, 10(3), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleich, E. (2009). State responses to ‘Muslim’ violence: A comparison of six West European countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(3), 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burchardt, M., & Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2013). ‘Multiple secularities: Religion and modernity in the global age’—Introduction. International Sociology, 28(6), 605–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: The case of the Netherlands. In C. Joppke & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrants in liberal nation-states (pp. 59–86). Houndmills: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  5. Hall, S. (1997). The local and the global: Globalization and ethnicity. Cultural Politics, 11, 173–187.Google Scholar
  6. Henkes, C. & Kneip, S. (2010). Von offener Neutralität zu (unintendiertem) Laizismus. Das Kopftuch zwischen demokratischem Mehrheitswillen und rechtsstaatlichen Schranken. Leviathan, 4(38), 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Howard, M. M. (2009). The politics of citizenship in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Janoski, T. (2010). The ironies of citizenship. Naturalization and integration in industrialized countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Joppke, C. (1999). Immigration and the nation-state. The United States, Germany, and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koopmans, R. (2008). Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koopmans, R., Statham, P., Giugni, M., & Passy, F. (2005). Contested citizenship: Immigration and cultural diversity in Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Koopmans, R., Waibel, S., & Michalowski, I. (2012). Citizenship rights for immigrants: National political processes and cross-national convergence in Western Europe, 1980–2008. American Journal of Sociology, 117(4), 1202–1245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lijphart, A. (1975). The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 8, 158–177.Google Scholar
  14. Maussen, M., Bader, V., & Moors, A. (Eds.). (2011). Colonial and post-colonial governance of Islam. Continuities and ruptures. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Meyer, H., & Schubert, K. (2010). Politik und Islam. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  16. Sassen, S. (1998). The De Facto transnationalizing of immigration policy. In C. Joppke (Ed.), Challenge to the nation-state: Immigration in Western Europe and the United States (pp. 49–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Soysal, Y. N. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Unit Migration, Integration, TransnationalizationWZBBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Fellow GroupMPI-MMGGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations