Rapid increase of benthic structural and functional diversity at the alpha ventus offshore test site
Chapter
First Online:
Abstract
The ecological importance of benthic organisms, which provide valuable ecosystem goods and services, necessitates careful research into the effects of offshore windfarms on the marine benthos. This chapter summarizes the results from benthos research activities within the StUKplus programme. The results showed considerable effects of the windfarm alpha ventus on the abundance and biomass of the benthic fauna. The major effect of the introduction of numerous wind turbine constructions into the marine environment was the aggregation and production of marine biota on the submersed structures, resulting in a substantial increase of the structural and functional biodiversity of the benthic system.
Keywords
Wind Turbine Benthic Community Reference Area German Bight Benthic Fauna
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Literature
- Bennet DB & Brown CG (1983). Crab (Cancer pagurus) migrations in the English Channel. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 63:371–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- BSH (2007). Standard Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine Environment (StUK3). Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie, Hamburg and Rostock, 58 p.Google Scholar
- Buchanan JB (1966). The biology of Echinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata: Spatangoidea) from different habitats. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 46:97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Coates D, Vanaverbeke J, Vincx M (2012). Enrichment of the soft sediment macrobenthos around a gravity based foundation on the Thorntonbank. In: Degraer S, rabant R, Rumes B (eds.) Offshore windfarms in the Belgian part of the North Sea: heading for an understanding of environmental impacts. Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Management Unit of the North Sea Mathematical Models, Marine Ecosystem Management Unit, Brussels, pp. 41–54.Google Scholar
- Duineveld GCA, Bergman MJN, Lavaleye MSS (2007). Effects of an area closed to fisheries on the composition of the benthic fauna in the southern North Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64: 899–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gili JM & Coma R (1998). Benthic suspension feeders: their paramount role in littoral marine food webs. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Green RH (1979). Sampling design and statistical models for environmental biologists. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
- Hill T & Lewicki P (2007). STATISTICA: Methods and Applications. StatSoft, Tulsa, OK.Google Scholar
- Joschko T, Buck B, Gutow L, Schröder A (2008). Colonization of an artificial hard substrate by Mytilus edulis in the German Bight. Marine Biology Research 4:350–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaiser MJ, Ramsay K, Richardson CA, Spencer FE, Brand AR (2000). Chronic fishing disturbance has changed shelf sea benthic community structure. Journal of Animal Ecology 69:494–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krone R, Gutow L, Brey T, Dannheim J, Schröder A (2013a). Mobile demersal megafauna at artificial structures in the German Bight – likely effects of offshore windfarm development. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 125:1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krone R, Gutow L, Joschko TJ, Schröder A (2013b). Epifauna dynamics at an offshore foundation – implications of future wind power farming in the North Sea. Marine Environmental Research 85:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Legendre L & Legendre P (1998). Numerical ecology. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Lindeboom HJ, Kouwenhoven HJ, Bergman MJN, Bouma S, Brasseur S, Daan R, Fijn RC, de Haan D, Dirksen S, van Hal R, Lambers RHR, Ter Hofstede R, Krijgsveld KL, Leopold M, Scheidat M (2011). Short-term ecological effects of an offshore windfarm in the Dutch coastal zone; a compilation. Environmental Research Letters 6 (035101):13.Google Scholar
- Merck T & von Nordheim H (2000). Mögliche Probleme von Offshore-Windenergieanlagen aus Naturschutzsicht. BfN-Skripten 29, 88–98 (2000).Google Scholar
- Page HM, Dugan JE, Dugan DS, Richards JB, Hubbard DM (1999). Effects of an offshore oil platform on the distribution and abundances of commercially important crab species. Marine Ecology Progress Series 185:47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pickering H & Whitmarsh D (1997). Artificial reefs and fisheries exploitation: a review of the ‘attraction versus production’ debate, the influence of design and its significance for policy. Fisheries Research 31:39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sadovy Y & Domeier M (2005). Are aggregation-fisheries sustainable? Reef fish fisheries as a case study. Coral Reefs 24:254–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Salzwedel H, Rachor E, Gerdes D (1985). Benthic macrofauna communities in the German Bight. Veröffentlichungen Institut für Meeresforschung Bremerhaven 20:199–267.Google Scholar
- Underwood AJ (1991). Beyond BACI: experimental designs for detecting human environmental impacts on temporal variations in natural populations. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 42:569–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Underwood AJ (1992). Beyond BACI: the detection of environmental impact on populations in the real, but variable, world. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 161:145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Underwood AJ (1993). The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Australian Journal of Ecology 18:99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wieking G & Kröncke I (2003.) Abundance and growth of the sea urchin Echinocardium cordatum in the central North Sea in the late 80 s and 90 s. Senckenbergiana Maritima 32:113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zintzen V, Massin C, Norro A, Mallefet J (2006). Epifaunal inventory of two shipwrecks from the Belgian continental shelf. Hydrobiologia 555:207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2014