Die Klimagerechtigkeitsbewegung und der hegemoniale Diskurs über Technologie

Chapter
Part of the Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie book series (BÜD, volume 39)

Zusammenfassung

Klimagerechtigkeit ist zu einer Idee des Mainstreams geworden. Einem Banner gleich wurde sie anlässlich jeder UN-Klimakonferenz, die jeweils daran scheiterten, ein stringentes und gerechtes Klimaabkommen zu vereinbaren, höher gehisst. Die Idee der Klimagerechtigkeit hat seit 1999 Gestalt angenommen (Bruno et al. 1999). Verschiedene Foren haben zur Entwicklung des Konzeptes beigetragen.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abramsky, Kolya (2009): Energy, Crisis and World-wide Production Relations. In: Brand, Ulrich; Bullard, Nicole; Lander, Edgardo; Mueller, Tazio (Hg): Contours of Climate Justice Ideas for shaping new climate and energy politics, Critical Currents No 6, Oktober 2009, S. 92–100.Google Scholar
  2. , Chris Ahmed , Haseed; Cutrone(2012): The Occupy Movement, a Renascent Left, and Marxism Today: An Interview with Slavoj Žiоek. In: Platypus Review 42, December 2011-January 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://platypus1917.org/2011/12/01/occupy-movement-interview-with-slavojzizek/(Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  3. Allan, Andrew (2012): CERs ease below a euro as sellers dump credits. PointCarbon Carbon Market News Service, 22. Oktober 2012.Google Scholar
  4. Austen , Martina; Bedall, Philip (2012): Climate Justice – Point of Reference for a counter hegemony or nebulous empty phrase? Abrufbar unter: http://notesfrombelow.wordpress.com/2010/07/29/climate-justice-point-of-reference-for-a-counter-hegemony-or-nebulous-empty-phrase/#_edn1 (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  5. Austen , Martina; Bedall, Philip (2010): Climate Justice – Bezugspunkt einer Gegenhegemonie oder wolkige Leerformel? In: analyse & kritik – Zeitung fur linke Debatte und Praxis, 549, 16. April 2010.Google Scholar
  6. Benney, Mark (1983): Gramsci on Law, Morality, and Power. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 11, S. 191–208.Google Scholar
  7. Brand, Ulrich (2007): The Internationalization of the State as the Reconstitution of Hegemony. IPW Working Papers No. 1/2007.Google Scholar
  8. Brand , Ulrich; Bullard, Nicole; Lander, Edgardo , und Mueller , Tadzio (2009): Radical climate change politics in Copenhagen and beyond: From criticism to action. In: Brand, Ulrich; Bullard, Nicole; Lander, Edgardo und Mueller, Tadzio (Hg): Contours of Climate Justice Ideas for shaping new climate and energy politics, Critical Currents No 6, October 2009, S. 9–16.Google Scholar
  9. Brunnee , Jutta; Toope, Stephen (2010): Legitimacy and Legality in International Law: An Interactional Account. Cambridge u. a.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bruno , Kenny; Karliner, Joshua; Brotsky, China (1999): Greenhouse Gangster vs. Climate Justice, CorpWatch, 1. November 1999.Google Scholar
  11. Cox, Robert (1981): Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. In: Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10, 2, S. 126–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cox, Robert (1983): Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations. In: Millennium. Journal of International Studies, 12, 2, S. 162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cox, Robert (1993): Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: an Essay in Method. In: Gill, Stephen (Hg): Gramsci. Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Lucia, Vito (2009): Hegemony and Climate Justice. A Critical Analysis. In: Bohm, Steffen; Dabhi, Siddhartha (Hg): Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: MayFlyBooks, S. 230–243.Google Scholar
  15. Dutta, Soumya (2009): Offsetting Lives and Livelihoods: Atmospheric Brown Cloud and the Targeting of Asia’s Rural Poor. In: Bohm, Steffen; Dabhi, Siddhartha (Hg): Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets. London: MayFlyBooks, S. 163–171.Google Scholar
  16. Gill, Stephen (1993): Gramsci. Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ellul, Jacques (1964): The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  18. Feenberg, Andrew (1999): Questioning Technology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Feenberg, Andrew (2005): Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview. In: Tailoring Biotechnologies, 1, 1, S. 47–64.Google Scholar
  20. Femia, Joseph (1981): Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Friends of the Earth (2009): A Dangerous Obsession. The Evidence Against Carbon Trading And For Real Solutions To Avoid A Climate Crunch. Summary Report. Abrufbar unter: http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/reports/dangerous_obsession_sum.pdf (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  22. Fuller, Lon (1969): The Morality of Law, Revised Edition. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fuller, Lon (1977): The Anatomy of the Law. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  24. Gill, Stephen (Hg.) (1993): Gramsi, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gramsci, Antonio (2007a): Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ubersetzt von Hoare, Quintin und and Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey (Hg): Lawrence and Wishart. London: Harbour Pub Co Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Gramsci, Antonio (2007b): Quaderni del Carcere, Edizione Critica dell’Istituto Gramsci, a cura di Valentino Gerratana. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  27. Harvey, Fiona (2012): Global carbon trading system has ‚essentially collapsed‘. In: The Guardian, 10. September 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/sep/10/global-carbon-trading-system (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  28. Higgins, Polly (2010): Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and Governance to Stop the Destruction of the Planet. London: Shepheard-Walwyn.Google Scholar
  29. Hornborg, Alf (2001): The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hultman, Nathan (2011): The Durban Climate Talks: Making the Technology Mechanism Useful, Brookings, opinion, December, 9 2011. Abrufbar unter: http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2011/12/09-technology-mechanism-hultman (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  31. ICHRP, International Council on Human Rights Policy (2008): Climate Change and Human Rights. A Rough Guide, International Council on Human Rights Policy. Versoix, Switzerland. Abrufbar unter: http://www.ichrp.org/files/reports/45/136_report.pdf (Zugriff am 22. Oktober2012).
  32. IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2000): Methodological and Technological Issues in Technology Transfer. Summary for Policymakers. A Special Report of IPCC Work ing Group III. Abrufbar unter: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/srtt-en.pdf (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  33. Khor, Martin (2012): The equitable sharing of atmospheric and development space: Summary. South Centre Paper for UNFCCC AWG-LCA workshop on Equity Bonn, 16. Mai 2012.Google Scholar
  34. Laclau, Ernesto (1989): Politics and the Limits of Modernity. In: Social Text, 21, Universal Abandon? The Politics of Postmodernism, S. 63–82.Google Scholar
  35. Laclau , Ernesto; Mouffe, Chantal (2001): Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2. Auflage. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  36. Law, Alex (2009): The Callous Credit Nexus’: Ideology and Compulsion in the Crisis of Neoliberalism. In: Sociological Research Online, 14, 4, S. 5.Google Scholar
  37. Litowitz, Douglas (2000): Gramsci, Hegemony and the Law. In: Brigham Young University Law Review, 2, S. 515–551.Google Scholar
  38. Lohmann, Larry (2006): Carbon Trading. A Critical Conversation on Climate Change, Privatisation and Power. In: Development Dialogue, 48, September 2006. Dag Hammarskjold Center.Google Scholar
  39. Lohmann, Larry (2008a): Carbon Trading, Climate Justice and the Production of Ignorance: Ten examples. In: Development, 51, 3, S. 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lohmann, Larry (2008b): Six Arguments against Carbon Trading, Climate and Capitalism. Abrufbar unter: http://climateandcapitalism.com/2008/09/29/carbon-trading-the-wrong-wayto-deal-with-global-warming/ (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  41. Marcuse, Herbert (2006): One Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London and New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  42. Morton, Adam David (2007): Unravelling Gramsci. Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Economy. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  43. Mouffe, Chantal (1979): Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In: Mouffe, Chantal (Hg): Gramsci And Marxist Theory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd, S. 168–204.Google Scholar
  44. Mumford, Lewis (1974): Pentagon Of Power: The Myth Of The Machine, Vol. II, New York: Harcour Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  45. Neslen, Arthur (2012): Polish ‚ghost‘ coal plants ignite emissions trading outrage. In: The Guardian, 11. Juli 2012. Abrufbar unter: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jul/11/coalenergy(Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  46. Parry, Simon; Douglas, Ed (2011): In China, the true cost of Britain’s clean, green wind power experiment: Pollution on a disastrous scale. Mail Online, 26. Januar 2011. Abrufbar unter: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article –1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-cleangreen-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  47. Paterson, Matthew (2010): Legitimation and Accumulation in Climate Change Governance. In: New Political Economy, 15, 3, S. 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paul , Justin; Campbell, Gwenette (2011): Investigating Rare Earth Element Mine Development in EPA Region 8 and Potential Environmental Impacts. EPA Document –908R11003, 15. August 2011.Google Scholar
  49. Postema, Gerald (1994): Implicit Law. In: Law and Philosophy, 13, 3, S. 361–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Poulantzas, Nicos (1980): State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  51. Pusey , Andre; Russell, Bertie (2010): The Climate Crisis or the Crisis of Climate Politics? Perspectives 2010. Abrufbar unter: http://www.anarchiststudies.org/node/423 (Zugriff am 22. Oktober2012).
  52. Rappaport, Roy (2010): Ritual and Religion in the Making of Humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sheppard, Kate (2009): Poor Countries Reject „Suicide Pact“, Mother Jones, 9. Dezember 2009. Abrufbar unter: http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2009/12/poor-countries-g77-suicide-pact-copenhagen(Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  54. Sweney, Mark (2009): Copenhagen climate change treaty backed by ‚Hopenhagen‘ campaign. In: The Guardian, 23. Juni 2009. Abrufbar unter: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/jun/23/hopenhagen-climate-change-campaign(Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  55. Tucker, Vincent (1999): The Myth of Development: A Critique of Eurocentric Discourse. In: Munck, Ronald; O’Hearne, Dennis (Hg.): Critical Development Theory: Contributions to aNew Paradigm. London: Zed Books, S. 1–26.Google Scholar
  56. Walker, Cam (2010): Copenhagen in Context. In: Dissent, Autumn/Winter, S. 17–19.Google Scholar
  57. Sauter , Raphael; Watson, Jim (2008): Technology Leapfrogging: A Review of the Evidence. A Report for DFID. Tyndal Center for Climate Change Report.Google Scholar
  58. Watts , Jonathan; van der Zee, Bibi; Vaughan, Adam (2009): Copenhagen day of mass protest passes without major incident. In: The Guardian, 16. Dezember 2009. Abrufbar unter: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/16/copenhagen-protest (Zugriff am 22. Oktober 2012).
  59. Winner, Langdon (1978): Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, Ma.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations