Advertisement

The Democratic Civil-Military Relations of Austerity: Thoughts about the Past and the Present

Chapter
  • 466 Downloads
Part of the Schriftenreihe des Zentrums für Militärgeschichte und Sozialwissenschaften der Bundeswehr book series (SZMSB, volume 14)

Abstract

How do defense institutions adjust to reductions in budgets amid an epoch of upheaval? This process of demobilization and retrenchment takes place amid the intensification of partisan politics in Western democracies made more toxic by an economic crisis all too similar to the 1930s. For young U.S. officers this situation burst forth without precedent.

Keywords

Western Democracy Defense Spending General Staff Defense Budget Partisan Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacevich, Andrew (2005): The New American Militarism: How Americans are Seduced by War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, Beth (2009): America’s Army: The Making of the All-Volunteer Force. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Baylis, John (1989): British Defense Policy: Striking the Right Balance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Flint, Roy (1986): Task Force Smith and the 24th Division: Delay and Withdrawal, 5–19 July 1950. In: Heller/Stofft 1986: 266–299.Google Scholar
  5. Freedman, Lawrence (1989): The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. Second Edition. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  6. Grove, Eric (1987): Vanguard to Trident: British Naval Policy since World War Two. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hamer, William S. (1970): The British Army: Civil-Military Relations, 1885–1905. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  8. Heller, Charles E./Stofft, William A. (Eds.) (1986): America’s First Battles, 1776–1965. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hogan, Michael J. (1998): A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Kennedy, Paul (1983): Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870–1945: Eight Studies. London – Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Leffler, Melvyn P. (1992): A Preponderance of Power: National Security, the Truman Administration and the Cold War. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Mitchell, William (1925): Winged Defense: The Development and Possibilities of Modern Air Power – Economic and Military. New York: G.P. Putnam & Sons.Google Scholar
  13. Neustadt, Richard E. (1999): Report to JFK: The Skybolt Crisis in Perspective. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Sherry, Michael (1987): The Rise of American Air Power: The Creation of Armageddon. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Snyder, Glenn H. (1962): The New Look of 1953. In: Schilling/Hammond/Snyder 1962: 379–524.Google Scholar
  16. Strachan, Hew (1997): The Politics of the British Army. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Upton, Emory (1968): The Military Policy of the United States. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schilling, Warner R./Hammond, Paul Y./Snyder, Glenn H. (Eds.) (1962): Strategy, Politics and Defense Budgets. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Weigley, Russell (1962): Towards an American Army: Military Thought from Washington to Marshall. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  20. Weigley, Russell (1983): The History of the United States Army. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey/CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations