Abstract

The discovery of pulsars by astronomers at the University of Cambridge, England, during 1967 (Hewish et al., 1968) was one of the more exciting events in astronomy of recent years. The very unusual properties of these objects generated a great deal of effort on the part of both observational and theoretical astronomers. This resulted in the production of large amounts of observational data and numerous theories attempting to explain the observed properties. Searches for pulsars were instituted at many observatories around the world, with the result that the number of known pulsars grew rapidly from the original four discovered at Cambridge to over 100 known now. Many of these pulsars have been found by searching for bursts of strong pulses on records from a large radio-telescope equipped with a receiver sensitive to rapid input fluctuations. This technique has been particularly successful at the Molonglo Radio Observatory in Australia, where about 30 of the presently known pulsars have been discovered. Pulsars were not discovered earlier because in most radio astronomical observations, receivers have relatively long time constants to smooth out random noise fluctuations. Consequently these receivers do not respond to pulsar pulses.

Keywords

Neutron Star Pulse Shape Position Angle Main Pulse Individual Pulse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abies, J. G., M. M. Komesaroff, and P. A. Hamilton. 1970. Astrophys. Lett. 6:147.ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Backer, D. C. 1970. Nature 228:42.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark, R. R., and F. G. Smith. 1969. Nature 221 : 724.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cocke, W. J., M. J. Disney, and D. J. Taylor. 1969. Nature 221:525.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cole, T. W., H. K. Hesse, and C. G. Page. 1970. Nature 225:713.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gold,T. 1968. Nature 218:731.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Goldreich, P., and W. H. Julian. 1969. Astrophys. J. 157:869.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hankins, T. H. 1971. Astrophys. J. 169:487.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hewish, A., S. J. Bell, J. D. Pilkington, P. F. Scott, and R. A. Collins. 1968. Nature 217: 709.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huguenin, G. R., R. N. Manchester, and J. H. Taylor. 1971. Astrophys. J. 169:97.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kristian, J., N. Visvanathan, J. A. Westphal, and G. H. Snellen. 1970. Astwphys. J. 162:475.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Manchester, R. N. 1971. Astrophys. J. Suppl. 23: 283.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. -, and J. H. Taylor. 1972. Astrophys. Lett. 10:67.ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Ostriker, J. P. and J. E. Gunn. 1969a. Astrophys. J. 157:1395.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. -, 1969b. Nature 223:813.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pacini, F. 1968. Nature 219:145.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Radhakrishnan, V., and D. J. Cooke. 1969. Astrophys. Lett. 3:225.ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. -, D. J. Cooke, M. M. Komesaroff, and D. Morris. 1969. Nature 221:443.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rickett, B. J. 1970. Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 150:67.ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Salpeter, E. E. 1969. Nature 221:31.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith, F. G. 1970. Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 149:1.ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Tademaru, E. 1971. Astrophys. Space Sci. 12:193.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, J. H., and G. R. Huguenin. 1971. Astrophys. J. 167:273.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. -, G. R. Huguenin, R. M. Hirsch, and R. N. Manchester. 1971. Astrophys. Lett. 9:205.ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. ter Haar, D. 1972. Phys. Rep. 3C: 57.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard N. Manchester

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations