Inertia and development models

  • Georg Sørensen
Chapter

Abstract

This essay is about inertia in relation to models of development1. Terminology first: I use the Encyclopedia Britannica (1985:306) definition of inertia, ‘property of body by virtue of which it opposes any agency that attempts to put it in motion or, if it is moving, to change the magnitude or direction of its velocity’. A ‘model of developmenf contains three components: (a) a concept of development defining the goal of the development process, that is, clarifying the notion of development itself; (b) a strategy of development, concerning the guidelines for action intended to move the process of development along; behind these two elements is a third, namely (c) a theory of development meaning a set of hypotheses regarding conditions, relationships and structures which are held to be important for the process of development. Furthermore, the ‘processes of development’ to which I refer concern the level of societies even if there will be some references to specific groups and individuals. The distinction between the three dimensions of development models is purely analytical; they are closely interrelated: the formulation of a strategy requires theoretical considerations which must also include a notion of the goal, the concept of development.

Keywords

Social Force State Leader Industrial Growth Human Development Report Agrarian Reform 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashton, B. et al. ‘Famine in China’, Population and Development Review, vol. 10, no. 4, December. (1984)Google Scholar
  2. Barraclough, Geoffrey. ‘Worlds Apart: Untimely Thoughts on Development and Development Strategies’, IDS Discussion Paper 152, Sussex: Institute of Development Studies. 1980.Google Scholar
  3. Bello, Waiden & Rosenfeld, Stephanie ‘Dragons in Distress. The Crisis of the NICs’, World Policy Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 431–69. (119).Google Scholar
  4. Bienefeld, Manfred. ‘The Lessons of History and the Developing .World’, Monthly Review, vol. 41, no. 3, July-August, pp. 9–42. (1989)Google Scholar
  5. Drèze, Jean & Sen, A Hunger and Public Action, Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1989.Google Scholar
  6. Encyclopaedia Britannica vol. 6, Chicago: The University of Chicago. 1985.Google Scholar
  7. Gold, Thomas B. State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle, New York. 1986.Google Scholar
  8. Hettne, Björn.Development Theory and the Three Worlds, Burnt Mill, Harlow: Longman Scientific and Technical. 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Ka, C. & M. Seiden. ‘Original Accumulation, Equity and Late Industrialization: The Cases of Socialist China and Capitalist Taiwan’, World Development, vol. 14, no. 10–11. (1986).Google Scholar
  10. Kitching, Gavin.Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective: Populism, Nationalism and Industrialization, London and New York: Methuen. 1982.Google Scholar
  11. Mitchell, G. Duncan. A Hundred Years of Sociology, London. 1968.Google Scholar
  12. Myrdal, Gunnar. Asian Drama. An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations, vols. I-III, New York: Pantheon. 1968.Google Scholar
  13. Riskin, Carl. China’s Political Economy. The Quest for Development Since 1949, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1987.Google Scholar
  14. Rosenberg, W.G. & Young, M. B. Transforming Russia and China. Revolutionary Struggle in the Twentieth Century, New York. 1982Google Scholar
  15. Sørensen, Georg. Udviklingsteori og den tredje Verden (Development Theory and the Third World), Aalborg: Aalborg University Press. 1986.Google Scholar
  16. Sørensen, Georg. Democracy, Dictatorship and Development. Economic Development in Selected Regimes of the Third World, London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press. 1991.Google Scholar
  17. Sørensen, Georg. Democracy and the Developmental State, mimeo, Aarhus: Institute of Political Science. 1991A.Google Scholar
  18. Sørensen, Georg. Strategies and Structures of Development. The New Dogma and the Limits to Its Promises, paper for the EADI 6th General Conference, Oslo, June. 1990.Google Scholar
  19. Sørensen, Georg. How Cold is the Second Cold War? — An Asessment of the Scope of the ‘Great Contest’, Scandinavian Journal of Development Alternatives, vol. IV, no. 2, June, pp. 48–66. (1985).Google Scholar
  20. Sørensen, Georg. Udviklingsproblematikken fer 2. verdenskrig (The Development Issue Before World War 2), mimeo, Aarhus. 1979.Google Scholar
  21. Thurston, Anne F. ‘Victim’s of China’s Cultural Revolution: The Invisible Wounds’, Pacific Affairs, vol. 57, no. 4. (1984–5).Google Scholar
  22. Toye, John Dilemmas of Development. Reflections on the Counterrevolution in Development Theory and Policy, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1987.Google Scholar
  23. Trainer, Ted A Rejection of the Brundtland Reporf, if da dossier no. 77, May-June, pp. 71–85. (1990).Google Scholar
  24. UNDP. Human Development Report 1991, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1991.Google Scholar
  25. UNDP. Human Development Report 1990, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1990.Google Scholar
  26. Womack, B. ‘The Party and the People: Revolutionary and Postrevolutionary Politics in China and Vietnam’, World Politics, vol. 29, no. 4, July. (1987).Google Scholar
  27. World Bank. World Development Report 1991, Washington: The World Bank. 1991Google Scholar
  28. Yunpeng Chu Taiwan’s Poverty: Decomposition and Policy Simulations, paper for Conference on Economic Development and Social Welfare in Taiwan, Taipei. 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Sørensen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations