Principles of Immunomodulatory Therapy

  • David R. Cornblath
  • Reinhard Hohlfeld
  • Thomas P. Bleck

Abstract

This chapter concerns the principles of immunomodulatory therapy for use in the neurologic intensive care unit (ICU). These principles, which are derived from those generally used for patients receiving immunomodulatory therapy, are particularly important in the ICU. This is because the side effects of the drugs used are considerable and will be compounded by the concurrent illnesses of patients in the ICU. However, there are differences between the use of these agents in the ICU setting and their use in the general clinical setting. For most intensive care patients the ICU stay is relatively short, and thus the long-term responsibility for immunomodulatory therapy will rest with other physicians. In many cases, patients in the ICU are sicker than others receiving immunomodulatory therapy, and the temptation is to use greater degrees of immunosuppression than would be used in the outpatient setting, in the belief that the potential benefit outweighs the additional risk. In selected cases this is justified, but this premise should be examined for each patient. As mentioned above, the complications and side effects of the individual agents should be borne in mind, as these will be exacerbated by the patient’s coexisting illnesses.

Keywords

Intensive Care Unit Plasma Exchange Immunomodulatory Therapy Intensive Care Unit Setting Therapeutic Plasma Exchange 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggested Reading

  1. Baxter JD (1990) Minimizing the side-effects of glucocorticoid therapy. Adv Intern Med 35: 173–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baylink DJ (1983) Glucocorticoid-induced osteo- porosis. N Engl J Med 309: 306–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Consensus Conference (1986) The utility of therapeutic plasmapheresis for neurological disorders. JAMA 256: 1333–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornblath DR, McArthur JC, Kennedy PGE, Witte AS, Griffin JW (1987) Inflammatory demyelinating peripheral neuropathies associated with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type III infection. Ann Neurol 21: 32–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dau PC (ed) (1979) Plasmapheresis and the immunobiology of myasthenia gravis. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  6. Drachman DB (1962) Myasthenia gravis and the thyroid gland. N Engl J Med 266: 330–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drachman DB, McIntosh KR, DeSilva SD, Kuncl RW, Kahn C (1988) Strategies for the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 540: 176–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dwyer JM (1992) Drug therapy: manipulating the immune system with immune globulin. N Engl J Med 326: 107–116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. French Cooperative Group on Plasma Exchange and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (1987) Efficacy of plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome: role of replacement fluids. Ann Neurol 22: 753–761Google Scholar
  10. Guillain-Barré Study Group (1985) Plasmapheresis and acute Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neurology 35: 1096–1104Google Scholar
  11. Hohlfeld R, Toyka KV, Besinger VA, Gerhold B, Heininger K (1985) Myasthenia gravis: reactivation of clinical disease and of autoimmune factors after discontinuation of long-term azathioprine. Ann Neurol 17: 238–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kehrl JH, Fauci AS (1983) The clinical uses of glucocorticoids. Ann Allergy 50: 2–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Newsom-Davis J, Ward CD, Wilson SJ, Pinching AJ, Vincent A (1979) Plasmapheresis: short-and long-term benefits? In: Dau PC (ed) Plasmapheresis and the immunobiology of myasthenia gravis. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, pp 199–208Google Scholar
  14. Osterman PO, Lundemo G, Pirskanen R, Fagius J, Pihlstedt P, Siden A (1984) Beneficial effects of plasma exchange in acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy. Lancet 2: 1296–1298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shumak KH, Rock GA (1984) Therapeutic plasma exchange. N Engl J Med 310: 762–771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thorn GW (1966) Clinical considerations in the use of corticosteroids. N Engl J Med 274: 775–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tindall RSA, Rollins JA, Phillips T, Greenlee RG, Wells L, Belendiuk G (1987) Preliminary results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cyclosporine in myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med 316: 719–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. van der Meché FGA, Schmitz PIM, Dutch Guillain-Barré Study Group (1992) A randomized trial comparing intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchange in Guillain-Barré syndrome. N Engl J Med 326: 1123–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Warmolts JR, Engel WK (1972) Benefits from alternate-day prednisone in myasthenia gravis. N Engl J Med 286: 17–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wekerle H, Hohlfeld R (1992) Principles of therapeutic approaches to autoimmunity. In: Rose NR, Mackay I (eds) The autoimmune diseases. II. Academic, San Diego, pp 387–408Google Scholar
  21. Witte AS, Cornblath DR, Parry GJ, Lisak RP, Schatz NJ (1984) Azathioprine in the treatment of myasthenia gravis. Ann Neurol 15: 602–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Cornblath
  • Reinhard Hohlfeld
  • Thomas P. Bleck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations