Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a relatively new modality with several advantages for the study of the female pelvis [21]. It is not significantly disturbed by respiratory or cardiac motion [30]. Soft tissue contrast is better than with computed tomography (CT) and can be improved by changes in acquisition sequences [17]. Coronal and sagittal planes are directly acquired and are very useful for the study of pelvic lesions. Blood vessels are naturally visible without contrast media. Moreover, the acquisition of images without using ionizing radiation is a definite asset in benign pathology [30].
Keywords
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Sagittal Section Hyperintense Signal Junctional Zone Hypointense Signal
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bies JR, Ellis JH, Kopecky KK, Sutton GP, Klatte EC, Stehman FB, Ehrlich CE (1984) Assessment of primary gynecologic malignancies. Comparison of 0.15-T resistive MRI with CT. AJR 143 1249–1257PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bryan PJ, Buttler HE, Lipuma JP (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am 22 897–915PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2 bis.Buthiau D, Yvart J, Idy I, Bittoun J, Darbois Y, Heitz F, Desgrez A (1987) Anatomie normale du pelvis féminin en imagerie par résonance magnétique (IRM). Ann Radiol 30 237–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2 ter.Buthiau D, Yvart J, Idy I, Bittoun J, Darbois Y, Heitz F, Desgrez A (1987) Intérêt de l’imagerie par résonance magnétique au cours de la pathologie pelvienne gynécologique. Ann Radiol 30 245–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Butler H, Bryan PJ, Lipuma JP, Cohen AM, Yousef SE, Andriole JG, Lieberman J (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of the abnormal female pelvis. AJR 143 1259–1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Demas BE, Hricak H, Jaffe RB (1986) Uterine MR imaging effects of hormonal stimulation. Radiology 159 123–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dooms GC, Hricak H, Moseley ME, Bottles K, Fisher M, Higgins C (1985) Characterization of lymphadenopathy by magnetic resonance relaxation times preliminary results. Radiology 155 691–697PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Dooms GC, Hricak H, Tscholakoff D (1986) Adnexal structures MR imaging. Radiology 158 639–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Fishman Javitt MC, Stein HL, Lovecchio JL (1987) MRI in staging of endometrial and cervical carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging 5 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Glazer HS, Lee KT, Levitt RG, Heiken JP, Ling D, Totty WG, Balfe DM, Emani B, Wasserman TH, Murphy WA (1985) Radiation fibrosis differentiation from recurrent tumor by MR imaging. Radiology 156 721–726PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Hamlin DJ, Petterson H, Fitzsimmons J, Morgan LS (1985) MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas and their complications. J Comput Assist Tomogr 9 902–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Hamlin DJ, Petterson H, Johnson JO, Fitzsimmons JR (1986) Advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis at 0.15 Tesla. Acta Radiol (Diagn) (Stockh) 27 369–377Google Scholar
- 11.Haynor DR, Mack LA, Soules MR, Shuman WP, Montana MA, Moss AA (1986) Changing appearance of the normal uterus during the menstrual cycle MR studies. Radiology 161 459–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE (1983) Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis initial experience. AJR 141 1119–1128PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Hricak H, Lacey C, Schnock E, Fischer MR, Amparo E, Dooms G, Jaffe R (1985) Gynecologic masses value of magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153 31–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Hricak H (1986) MRI of the female pelvis a review. AJR 146 1115–1122PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hricak H, Tscholakoff D, Heinrichs L, Fisher M, Dooms GC, Reinhold C, Jaffe RB (1986) Uterine leiomyomas correlation of MR, histopathologic findings, and symptoms. Radiology 158 385–391PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Hricak H, Stern JL, Fisher MR, Shapeero LG, Winkler ML, Lacey CG (1987) Endometrial carcinoma staging by MR imaging. Radiology 162 297–305PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kulkarni MV, Shaff MI, Carter MM, Dudley S, Burks DD, Partain CL, James AE (1985) Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis. Radiographics 5 611–625Google Scholar
- 18.Lee JKT, Heiken JP, Ling D, Glazer HS, Balfe DM, Levitt RG, Dixon WT, Murphy WA (1984) Magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal and pelvic lymphadenopathy. Radiology 153 181–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Lee JKT, Gersell DJ, Balfe DM, Worthington JL, Picus D, Gapp G (1985) The uterus in vitro MR-Anatomic correlation of normal and abnormal specimens. Radiology 157 175–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.McCarthy S, Tauber C, Gore J (1986) Female pelvic anatomy MR assessment of variations during the menstrual cycle and with use of oral contraceptives. Radiology 160 119–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.McCarthy S (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Magn Reson Imaging 4 59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Mark AS, Hricak (1987) Intrauterine contraceptive devices MR imaging. Radiology 162 311–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Masselot J, Galakhoff C, George M, Haie C, Michel G (1987) La tomodensitométrie dans les cancers de l’utérus et de l’ovaire. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet 82 79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Michel G, Galakhoff C, Masselot J, Vanel D, Heran F, Charpentier P, Castaigne D, Gerbaulet A, George M (1987) Intérêt de l’imagerie par résonance magnétique des cancers du col et du corps de l’utérus. Etude préliminaire à propos de 9 cas de cancer du corps et de 20 cas du corps de l’utérus. J Radiol 68 167–175PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mintz MC, Thickman D, Gussman D, Kressel HY (1987) MR evaluation of uterine anomalies. AJR 148 287–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Mitchell DG, Gefter WB, Spritzer CE, Blasco L, Nulson J, Livolsi V, Axel L, Arger PH, Kressel HY (1986) Polycystic ovaries MR imaging. Radiology 160 425–429PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Mitchell DG, Mintz MC, Spritzer CE, Gussman D, Arger PH, Coleman BG, Axel L, Kressel HY (1987) Adnexal masses MR imaging observations at 1.5 T, with US ans CT correlation. Radiology 162 319–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Nishimura K, Togashi K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Noma S, Kawamura Y, Nakano Y, Itoh H, Torizuka K, Ozasa H (1987) Endometrial cysts of the ovary MR Imaging. Radiology 162 315–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Powell MC, Womack C, Buckley J, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1986) Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of stage I endometrial adenocarcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93 353–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Powell MC, Worthington BS, Sokal M, Wastie M, Buckley J, Symonds EM (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging its application to cervical carcinoma. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93 1276–1285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Pujol H, Prade M (1979) Extension anatomique des carcinomes infiltrants du col utérin. Bull Cancer (Paris) 66 503–514Google Scholar
- 32.Spritzer CE, Kressel HY, Mitchell D (1987) Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis. Magnetic Resonance Annual. Raven Press, New York, pp 203–235Google Scholar
- 33.Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Asato R, Nakano Y, Itoh H, Torizuka K, Ozasa H, Mori T (1986) Uterine cervical cancer assessment with high-field MR imaging. Radiology 160 431–435PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Sago T, Minami S, Nakano Y, Itoh H, Torizuka K, Ozasa H (1987) Ovarian cystic teratomas MR imaging. Radiology 162 669–673PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itoh K, Fujisawa I, Nakano Y, Torizuka K, Ozasa H, Ohshima M (1987) Vaginal agenesis classification by MR Imaging. Radiology 162 675–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Worthington J, Balfe DM, Lee JKT, Gersell DJ, Heiken JP, Ling D, Glazer HS, Jacobs AJ, Kao MS, McClennan LB (1986) Uterine neoplasms MR Imaging. Radiology 159 725–730PubMedGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag France 1989