Abstract
Psychologists working in the field of law and psychology tend to think that there is a special relationship between the two disciplines. The law, as a system of rules and a practice of applying these rules, is a human, perhaps an all too human, enterprise. The rules of law, however, are not only invented and applied by men; they are also meant to apply to men. As a device for the control of human behavior, the law is subject to empirical constraints of a psychological nature. In order to be successful, the law must take into account the possibilities and impossibilities of human behavior. The rules can only prescribe what is humanly possible; they cannot forbid what is humanly unavoidable. As an institution it should only take measures that can successfully affect behavior. There is no moral issue here; it is merely a matter of practicalities. If the law disregards the constraints of empirical psychology, it simply becomes ineffective. Whether that would be morally wrong is at best a secondary question.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruner, J. (1984). Narrative and paradigmatic modes of thought. (Invited Address), Division 1, APA Annual Convention, Toronto, August 25.
Cohen, L. J. (1977). The probable and the provable. Oxford: Clarendon.
Cohen, L. J. (1979). On the psychology of predication: Whose is the fallacy? Cognition, 7, 385 - 407.
Cohen, L. J. (1980). Whose is the fallacy? A rejoinder to Daniel Kahneman and Amos Pier-sky. Cognition, 8, 89 - 92.
Crombag, H. F.M. (1984). Some psychological observations on mens rea. In D. J. Müller, D.E. Blackman, & A. J. Chapman (Eds.), Psychology and law (pp. 55 - 65 ). Chicester: Wiley.
Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671 - 684.
Denning, L. (1961). Responsibility before the law. Jerusalem: Magnes.
Fincham, E D., & Jaspers, J. M. (1980). Attribution of responsibility: from man the scientist to man the lawyer. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology: Vol. 13 (pp. 81 - 138 ). New York: Academic.
Finkelstein, W. O., & Fairly, W. B. (1970). A Bayesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review, 83, 489 - 517.
Fleming, J. G. (1967). An introduction to the law of torts. Oxford: Clarendon.
Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper and Row.
Haisch, J. (1980). Anwendung von Attributionstheorie als normatives Modell für eine rationale Strafzumessung: experimentelle Überprüfung eines Trainingsprogrammes. Zeit schrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 27, 415 - 427.
Hart, H. L.A. (1968). Punishment and responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hart, H.L.A., & Honoré, A.M. (1959). Causation in the law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Hogarth, J. (1971). Sentencing as a human process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Jones, E. E. (1976). How do people perceive the causes of behavior? American Scientist, 64, 300 - 305.
Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1972). The actor and the observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones et al. (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: a reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7, 409 - 411.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107 - 128.
Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lüer, A. (Ed.). (1983). Bericht über den 33. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Mainz 1982. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Münsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand. Essays on psychology and crime. New York: Doubleday, Page.
Nisbett, R., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Saks, M.J., & Kidd, R. F. (1980/1981) Human information processing and adjudication: trial by heuristics. Law and Society Review, 15, 123 - 160.
Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sturm, A. (1910). Die psychologische Grundlage des Rechts. Hannover: Helwigsche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Tapp, J.L. (1976). Psychology and law: an overture. Annual Review of Psychology, 27, 359 - 404.
Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.
Toch, H. (Ed.). (1961). Legal and criminal psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm: Beckmans.
Tribe, L. H. (1971). Trial by mathematics: precision and ritual in the legal process. Harvard Law Review, 84, 1329 - 1393.
Undeutsch, U. (Ed.). (1967). Forensische Psychologie. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie.
Van den Haag, E. (1975). Punishing criminals. New York: Basic Books.
Van den Heuvel, G. A. A. J. (1985). Psychologie en recht: variaties op een thema. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie, 40, 196 - 207.
Van Houten, R. (1983). Punishment: from the animal laboratory to the applied setting. In S. Axelrod, & J. Apsche (Eds.), The effects of punishment on human behavior. New York: Academic.
Walters, G. C., & Grusec, J. E. (1977). Punishment. San Francisco: Freeman.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crombag, H.F.M. (1989). When Law and Psychology Meet. In: Wegener, H., Lösel, F., Haisch, J. (eds) Criminal Behavior and the Justice System. Research in Criminology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-86017-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-86019-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-86017-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive