Geographic Variation of Chromosome Forms in Spalax, A Subterranean Mammal of Restricted Mobility

  • J. Wahrman
  • Ruth Goitein
  • E. Nevo
Conference paper

Abstract

Several different types of rodents are found among the specialized mammals exploiting the subterranean ecological niche. Tunnels dug by them can often be detected through the mounds of earth thrown up during the burrowing. Striking anatomical and behavioral adaptations are associated with their fossorial mode of life (Ellerman, 1956; Pearson, 1959). The mole rats of the genus Spalax are an extreme example of such rodents; they are largely confined to a subterranean existence. Their adaptations include the great reduction in the development of their eyes, which are not visible externally.

Keywords

Reproductive Isolation Hybrid Zone Diploid Number Chromosome Change Chromosome Form 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Corbet, G. B.: The terrestrial mammals of western Europe. London: Foulis, 1966.Google Scholar
  2. Ellerman, J. R.: The subterranean mammals of the world. Trans. Roy. Soc. S. Afr. 55:11–20, 1959.Google Scholar
  3. Ellerman, J. R. and T. C. S. Morrison-Scott: Checklist of Palaearctic and Indian Mammals 1758-1946. London: British Museum, 1951.Google Scholar
  4. Kiblisky, P. and O. A. Reig: Variation in chromosome number within the genus Ctenomys and description of the male karyotype of Ctenomys talarum talarum Thomas. Nature (Lond.) 222:436–438, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Matthey, R.: Formules chromosomiques de Muridae et de Spalacidae. La question du polymorphisme chromosomique chez les mammifères. Rev. Suisse Zool. 66:175–209, 1959.Google Scholar
  6. Nevo, E.: Observations on Israeli populations of the mole rat Spalax e. ehrenbergi Nehring 1898. Mammalia 25:127–144, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nevo, E.: Mating behavior of the mole rat, Spalax ehrenbergi. Manuscript, 1968.Google Scholar
  8. Ognev, S. I.: Mammals of the U.S.S.R. and adjacent countries. Volume 5: Rodents. Moskva-Leningrad, 1947. English translation, Jerusalem, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. Ott, J.: Nachweis natürlicher reproduktiver Isolation zwischen Sorex gemellus Google Scholar
  10. Since this paper was presented, 5 further hybrid individuals have been found. Some information on the chromosomes of Spalax from Romania is now available (Raicu, P., S. Bratosin and M. Hamar: Study on the karyotype of Spalax leucodon Nordm. and S. microphthalmus Guld. Caryologia 22:127–135, 1968).Google Scholar
  11. sp. n. und Sorex araneus Linnaeus 1758 in der Schweiz (Mammalia, In-sectivora). Rev. Suisse Zool. 75:53–75, 1968.Google Scholar
  12. Patton, J. L.: Chromosome evolution in the pocket mouse, Perognathus goldmani Osgood (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). 43rd annual meeting of the Southwestern and Rocky Mountain Division of the AAAS (Abstract), 1967.Google Scholar
  13. Patton, J. L.: Personal communication, 1968.Google Scholar
  14. Patton, J. L. and R. E. Dingman: Chromosome studies of pocket gophers, genus Thomomys. I. The specific status of Thomomys umbrinus (Richardson) in Arizona. J. Mammal. 49:1–13, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pearson, O. P.: Biology of the subterranean rodents, Ctenomys, in Peru. Memor. Mus. Hist. Nat. Javier Prado, Lima 9:1–56, 1959.Google Scholar
  16. Reig, O. A. and P. Kiblisky: Chromosomes in four species of rodents of the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae) from Argentina. Experientia 24:274–276, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soldatović, B., B. Garzičić and S. Živković: Chromosome analysis of Spalax leucodon. Caryologia 19:261–265, 1966a.Google Scholar
  18. Soldatović, B., B., S. Živković, I. Savić and M. Miloševicć: Comparative karyotype analysis of two populations of Spalax leucodon Nordmann, 1840. Arhiv Biolokih Nauka 18:127–128, 1966b.Google Scholar
  19. Soldatović, B., B., S. Živković, I. Savić and M. Milošević: Vergleichende Analyse der Morphologie und der Anzahl der Chromosomen zwischen verschiedenen Populationen von Spalax leucodon Nordmann, 1840. Z. f. Säugetierkunde 32:238–245, 1967.Google Scholar
  20. State of Israel, Surveys Department: Atlas of Israel. 1956.Google Scholar
  21. Thornthwaite, C. W.: An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38:55–94, 1948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vaughan, T. A.: Movements made by two species of pocket gophers. Amer. Midl. Nat. 59:367–372, 1963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wahrman, J.: Unpublished work on chromosome forms and meiosis in Spalax. 1958.Google Scholar
  24. Walknowska, J.: Les chromosomes chez Spalax leucodon Nordm. Folia Biologica 11:293–307, 1963.Google Scholar
  25. White, M. J. D., R. E. Blackith, R. M. Blackith and J. Cheney: Cytogenetics of the viatica group of morabine grasshoppers. I. The “coastal” species. Aust. J. Zool. 15:263–302, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White, M. J. D.: Models of speciation. Science 159:1065–1070, 1968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1969

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Wahrman
    • 1
  • Ruth Goitein
    • 1
  • E. Nevo
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of GeneticsThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations