Bioceramics in Joint Arthroplasty pp 49-62 | Cite as
Role of Ceramic Components in the Era of Crosslinked Polyethylene for THR
Abstract
This paper presents a summary of 10 years experience of the authors in the search of advanced wear reduction bearing technologies for total hip replacement. By adhering to the principles of anatomical testing, cross-shear motion and biological lubrication in in-vitro hip simulator testing, the authors successfully reproduced the clinical wear- mechanisms, wear-debris, wear-rates and wear-rankings of past successful and unsuccessful bearing materials. This validated hip simulator test protocol was used to evaluate the wear performance of various next genetation bearing materials including metal-on-crosslinked polyethylene, ceramic-on-crosslinked polyethylene, metal-on-metal and ceramic-on-ceramic. A key criterion in determining the efficacy of the next generation bearing surface was that it show superior wear performance over predicate devices consistently and predictably in the laboratory. Metal-on-crosslinked polyethylene showed superior wear performance over metal-on-conventional polyethylene. However, this combination was still susceptible to 3rd-body wear. Ceramic-on-crosslinked polyethylene significantly reduced the susceptibility to 3rd-body wear while ceramic-on-ceramic articulation completely eliminated the 3rd-body wear problem. In contrast, precision made metal-on-metal devices failed the basic criteria test due to erratic and unpredictable wear behavior under carefully controlled laboratory conditions.
Keywords
Wear Rate Wear Performance Ceramic Component Crosslinked Polyethylene PMMA Bone CementPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Paul J, Force Actions Transmitted by Joints in the Human Body. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 192 (1976) 163–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Wang A, et. al., The Impact of Lubricant Protein Concentration on the Outcome of Hip Joint Simulator Testing. 45th ORS, 1999, p. 52.Google Scholar
- 3.Wang A, et. al., Quantitative Analysis of Serum Degradation and its Effect on the Outcome of Hip Joint Simulator Wear Testing of UHMWPE. 45th ORS, 1999, p. 73.Google Scholar
- 4.Charnley J, Kamangar A, and Longfield MD. The Optimum Size of Prosthetic Heads in Relation to the Wear of Plastic Sockets in Total Replacement of the Hip. Med. & Biol. Engng. 7:31–39, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Griffith MJ, Seidenstein MK, Williams D, Charnley J: Socket Wear in Charnley Low Friction Arthroplasty of the Hip. Clin Orthop 137 (1978) 37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Charnley J, Halley DK: Rate of Wear in Total Hip Replacement. Clin Orthop 112 (1975) 170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Livingston BJ, Chmell MJ, Spector M, Poss R: Complications of Total Hip Arthroplasty Associated with the Use of an Acetabular Component with a Hylamer Liner. JBJS 79A (1997) 1529.Google Scholar
- 8.Graeter JH, Nevins R: Early Osteolysis with Hylamer Acetabular Liners. J. Arthroplasty 14 (1999) 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Essner A, et. al., Hip Simulator Wear ot “Enhanced” UHMWPE Acetabular Inserts, 44th Ann. Mtng ORS, New Orleans, Mar. 16-19, 1998: 774.Google Scholar
- 10.Martell J, et. al., Preclinical Evaluation Followed by Randomized Clinical Study of a Crosslinked Polyethylene for Total Hip Arthroplasty at Two Year Follow-up, 47th Ann. Mtng, ORS, San Francisco, Feb. 25-28, 2001: 163.Google Scholar
- 11.Essner A, et. al., In Vitro and In Vivo Acetabular Cup Wear Corroboration, 47th Ann. Mtng, ORS, San Francisco, Feb. 25-28, 2001: 1007.Google Scholar
- 12.Wang A, Essner A, Polineni VK, Stark C and Dumbleton JH. Lubrication and Wear of Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene in Total Joint Replacements. Tribology International, Vol.31, No. 1-3:17–33, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Wang A and Schmidig G, Ceramic Heads Prevent Runaway Wear for Crosslinked UHMWPE Against 3rd-body Damage. 49th ORS, 2003 (accepted).Google Scholar
- 14.Doom PF, PA Campbell, J Worrall, PD Benya, HA Mckellop and HC Amstutz, Metal Wear Particle Characterization From Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Replacements: Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Periprosthetic Tissues and Isolated Particles, J Biomed Mater Res, 42, 103–111, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Jacobs JJ, NJ Hallab, AK Skipor, RM Urban, K Mikecz and TT Giant, Metallic Wear and Corrosion Products: Biological Implications, in Metasul: A Metal-on-Metal Bearing, Rieker C, M Wyndler and U Wyss (eds), Hans Huber, Bern, 1999, pp 125–132.Google Scholar
- 16.Haynes Dr, SD Rogers, S Hay, MJ Pearcy and DW Howie, The Differences in Toxicity and Release of Bone-Resorbing Mediators Induced by Titanium and Cobalt-Chromium-Alloy Wear Particles, JBJS, 75A, 825–834, 1993.Google Scholar
- 17.Allen MJ, BJ Myer, PJ Millet and N Rushton, The Effects of Particulate Cobalt, Chromium and Cobalt-Chromium Alloy in Human Osteoblast-like Cells In Vitro, JBJS, 79B, 475–482, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Goodman S, P Aspenberg, Y Song, G Knoblich, P Huie, D Regula and L Lidgren, Tissue Ingrowth and Differentiation in the Bone-Harvest Chamber in the Presence of Cobalt-Chromium-Alloy and High-Density-Polyethylene Particles, JBJS, 77A, 1025–1035, 1995.Google Scholar
- 19.MacDonald SJ, RW McCalden, DG Chess, RB Bourne, CH Rorabeck, D Cleland and F Leung, Metal-on-Metal Versus Polyethylene in Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial, CORR, in press.Google Scholar
- 20.Brodner W, P Bitzan, V Meisinger, A Kaider, F Gottsauner-Wolf and R Kotz, Elevated Serum Cobalt with Metal-on-Metal Articulating Surfaces, JBJS, 79B, 316–321.Google Scholar
- 21.Willert H-G, GH Buchhom, A Fayyazi and CH Lohmann, Histopathological Changes in Tissues Surrounding Metal/Metal Joints — Signs of Delayed Type Hypersensitivity? (DTH), in World Tribology Forum in Arthroplasty, Rieker C, S Oberholzer and U Wyss (Eds), Hans Huber, Bern, 2001, pp 147–166.Google Scholar
- 22.Lida H, E Kaneda, H Takada, K Uchida, K Kawanabe and T Nakamura, Metallosis Due to Impingement Between the Socket and the Femoral Neck in a Metal-on-Metal Bearing Total Hip Prosthesis, JBJS, 81A, 400–403, 1999.Google Scholar
- 23.Implant Wear in Total Joint Replacement, TM Wright and SB Goodman (eds), AAOS, Rosemont, Illinois, 2001.Google Scholar
- 24.Ingham E and J Fisher, Biological Reactions to Wear Debris in Total Joint Replacement, Proc instn Mech Engrs, 214, 21–37, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Lee JM, et. AL., Size of Metallic and Polyethylene Debris Particles in Failed Cemented Total Hip Replacement, JBJS, 74B, 1992, p. 380–384.Google Scholar
- 26.Urban, Robert M, Jacobs, Joshua J. et. al., Dissemination of Wear Particles to the Liver, Spleen an Abdominal Lymph Nodes of Patients with Hip or Knee Replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Vol. 82-A, No. 4, April 2000.Google Scholar
- 27.Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin A, A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty, J. Arthroplasty Vol. 17 No 5 (2002) 649–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Martell J, Incavo S, Clinical Performance of a Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene at 2 Years in THA. A Randomized Prospective Trial, 49th ORS, 2003 (accepted).Google Scholar
- 29.Nivbrant B, Roerhl S, Hewitt BJ, In Vivo Wear and Performance of Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Cups—a RSA Study of 30 Hips. 49th ORS, 2003 (accepted).Google Scholar
- 30.Williams PA, Clarke IC, Ceramic wear debris in total joint replacements: review of debris morphology and biological response, Key Engineering Materials Vols 218-220 (2002) 591–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar