Electronic Properties of Fullerenes pp 126-130 | Cite as
Jahn-Teller Distorted Excited States of C60
Conference paper
Abstract
The geometrical and electronic structure of various excited states of the C60 molecule is determined by a semi-empirical extended Hubbard model. The Jahn-Teller distortions are found to be small in terms of bond length changes (max. 0.02 Å). Triplet excited states of symmetries D 5d and D 2h have been found to be 0.089 eV and 0.040 eV below the icosahedral state. Other symmetries as D 3d can also be located but they are of higher energies. The triplet ground state in solution is predicted to have D 5d symmetry, while the D 2h state is likely the lowest triplet in the solid phase.
Keywords
Bond Order Ground State Geometry Icosahedral Symmetry Triplet Ground State Distortion Energy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]A.D.J. Haymet, J.Am. Chem. Soc. 108, 319 (1986), M.D. Newton, R.E. Stanton, ibid., 108, 2469 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]I. László and L. Udvardi, Chem. Phys. Lett., 136 (1987) 418ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]I. László and L. Udvardi, Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem), 183 (1989) 271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]H.P. Lüthi, J. Almlöf, Chem. Phys. Letters 135 357 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]K. Tanaka, M. Okada, K.Okahara and T. Yamabe, Chem. Phys. Letters 193 101 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]R.D. Bendale, J.F. Stanton, M.C. Zerner, Chem. Phys. Letters 194 467 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]F. Negri, G. Orlandi, F. Zerbetto, Chem. Phys. Letters, 144 31 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]N. Koga, K. Morokuma Chem. Phys. Letters 196 191 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]P.R. Surján: Second Quantized Approach to Quantum Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]C.A. Coulson, Proc. Roy. Soc A207 91 (1951)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [11]H.C. Longuet-Higgins and L. Salem, Proc. Roy Soc. A251 172 (1959)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [12]M. Kertesz and P.R. Surjan, Solid State Commun. 39 611 (1981)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]P.R. Surjan and H. Huzmany, Phys. Rev. B33 2615 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [14]J. Kürti, P.R. Surján, J. Chem. Phys. 92 3247 (1990); J. Math. Chem. 10 313 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]C. Kuhn, Phys. Rev. B40 7776 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
- [16]P.R. Surjan and K. Nemeth, Synth. Metals (in press)Google Scholar
- [17]M. Ozaki, A. Takahashi, Chem. Phys. Letters 127 242 (1986)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]C. Kuhn (to be published)Google Scholar
- [19]D.L. Lichtenburger, K.W. Nebesny, C.D. Ray, D.R. Huffman, D.L. Lamb Chem. Phys. Letters 176 (1991) 203ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]T. Thomas, private communicationGoogle Scholar
- [21]M. Bennati, A. Grupp, M. Mehring, K.P. Dinse, J. Fink, Chem. Phys. Letters 200 440 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]R.V. Benasson, T. Hill, C. Lambert, E.J. Land, S. Leach, T.G. Truscott, to be publishedGoogle Scholar
- [23]P.H.M. van Loosdrecht, M.A. Verheien, P.J.M. van Bentum, G. Meijer, this conferenceGoogle Scholar
- [24]A. Grupp, M. Bennati and M. Mehring, this conferenceGoogle Scholar
- [25]T.N. Thomas, D. Mihailovic, J.F. Ryan, R.A. Taylor, R. Zamboni, this conferenceGoogle Scholar
- [26]A. Grupp, private communicationGoogle Scholar
- [27]G. Meijer, private communicationGoogle Scholar
- [28]H. Aije, M. M. Alvarez, S. J. Anz, R. D. Beck, F. Diederich, K. Fostiropoulos, D. R. Huffman, W. Kratschmer, Y. Rubin, K. E. Schriver, K. Sensharma, R. L. Whetten, J. Phys. Chem. 94, 8630–8633 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]F. Negri, G. Orlandi, F. Zerbetto, J. Chem. Phys. 97 6496 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]R.D. Bendale, J.D. Baker, M.C. Zerner, Int. J. Quant. Chem, Quantum Chemistry Symposium 25 557–568 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993