Bacteriochlorophyll a- and c-Protein Complexes from Chlorosomes of Green Sulfur Bacteria Compared with Bacteriochlorophyll c Aggregates in CH2Cl2-Hexane

  • J. M. Olson
  • P. D. Gerola
  • G. H. van Brakel
  • R. F. Meiburg
  • H. Vasmel
Part of the Springer Series in Chemical Physics book series (CHEMICAL, volume 42)

Abstract

The two groups of green bacteria, Chlorobiaceae and Chloroflexaceae, contain bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) c or a related pigment as the main light-harvesting pigment [1]. In both groups all of the BChl c is located in chlorosomes, oblong bodies appressed to the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane as shown in Fig. 1. Inside the chlorosome are proteinaceous structures called rod elements which are thought to be made up of BChl c—binding proteins. These BChl c—binding proteins have recently been extracted from chlorosomes of Chloroflexus aurantiacus (Chloroflexaceae) [2] and Chlorobium limicola f. thiosulfatophilum (Chlorobiaceae). The Chloroflexus protein contains 51 amino acid residues, of which 4 are Asn and 4 are Gln. Similarly the Chlorobium protein contains ca. 55 residues, of which ca. 9 are Asn + Gln. Neither protein contains any Cys. The Chloroflexus protein contains no Lys and only one His, while the Chlorobium protein appears to contain little or no Arg, Trp, Tyr and His. From the amino acid sequence of the Chloroflexus protein it has been deduced that the protein can form an α-helix in which the amide groups (Asn and Gln) are located predominantly on one side of the helix. WECHSLER et al. [2] have proposed that 7 BChl c molecules are bound to each α-helix via interactions with 7 amide groups on the protein. Although the Chlorobium protein apparently shows little homology with the amino acid sequence of the Chloroflexus protein, we suppose that BChl c might be bound to the Chlorobium protein by a similar interaction. However, we do not yet know the complete sequence and probable conformation of the polypeptide.

Keywords

Circular Dichroism Spectrum Green Sulfur Bacterium Dipole Strength Rotational Strength Exciton Splitting 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.M. Olson: Biochim. Biophys. Acta 594, 33 (1980)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    T. Wechsler, F. Suter, R.C. Fuller, and H. Zuber: FEBS Lett. 181, 173 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.A. Betti, R.E. Blankenship, L.V. Natarajan, L.C. Dickinson, and R.C. Fuller: Biochim. Biophys. Acta 680, 194 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.I. Bystrova, I.N. Mal’gosheva, and A.A. Krasnovskii: Mol. Biol. 13, 440 (1979) [translated from Molekulyarnaya Biologiya 13, 582 (1979)]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.A. Krasnovsky and M.I. Bystrova: BioSystems 12, 181–194(1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.M. Smith, L.A. Kehres, and J. Fajer: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105, 1387 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    K.D. Philipson, S. Cheng Tsai, and K. Sauer: J. Phys. Chem. 15 1440–1445 (1971)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.J. Katz and J.C. Hindman: In Biological Events Probed by Ultrafast Laser Spectroscopy, edited by R.R. Alfano (Academic, New York 1982) p. 119Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.L. Shipman, T.M. Cotton, J.R. Norris and J.J. Katz: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98, 8222 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Olson
    • 1
  • P. D. Gerola
    • 1
  • G. H. van Brakel
    • 1
  • R. F. Meiburg
    • 2
  • H. Vasmel
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of BiochemistryOdense UniversityOdense MDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Biophysics, Huygens LaboratoryState UniversityRA LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations