Analysis of Continuous GPS Observations for Geodynamics Purposes
Conference paper
Abstract
To estimate the repeatability of baseline determination, the observed data series acquired from five IGS stations have been processed “day-by-day”. The individual stages of the experiment were already reported in [1], [3] presenting the results of the analysis of observation time series up to 315 days and discussing different processing strategies. This presentation summarizes the results of the analysis of the period of 585 days. In addition to it an attempt has been made to determine on the basis of the long-term observations the ITRF 93 coordinates of the newly accepted IGS station Pecný (GOPE) and to do the first assessment of its drift within the Eurasian plate.
Keywords
Height Difference Eurasian Plate Baseline Length Coordinate Difference Space Geodesy
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Kostelecky, J. - Novak, P. - Gimek, J.: On the Long Term Behaviour of Longer Baselines Determined by GPS. Initial Stage of Investigations. Reports on Geodesy, No. 2 (10), 1994, Warsaw University of Technology Inst. of Geodesy and Geod. Astronomy, pp. 181–186.Google Scholar
- [2]Kostelecky, J. - Karsky, G.: Analysis of the 1970–1983 Circumzenithal Measurements. Bull. Astron. Inst. Czech. 38, 1987, p. 16.Google Scholar
- [3]Kostelecky, J., Novak, P., Skofepa, L.: Preliminary analysis of continuous GPS observations Pres. at the 2nd CERGOP Working Conference, Penc–Budapest, Nov. 4–5, 1994;Google Scholar
- [4]Boucher, C., Altamimi, Z.: Specifications for reference frame fixing in the analysis of a EUREF GPS campaign. EUREF TWG Circular Letter from March 28, 1995.Google Scholar
- [5]Seeger, H., Schluter, W., Talich, M., Kenyeres, A., Arslan, E., Neumaier, P., Habrich, H.: Results of the EUREF-CS/H’91 GPS campaign, In: Report on the Symposium of the lAG Subcommis. EUREF held in Warsaw 8–11 June 1994. Veröffent. der Bayer. Komm. für die Intern. Erdmess. der BAW, Heft Nr 54, Munchen 1994, p. 87.Google Scholar
- [6]Zerbini, S.: Crustal motions from short-arc analysis of LAGEOS data. Centr. of Space Geodesy to Geodynamics: Crustal Dynamics, Geodynamics 23, 1993, p. 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]Reigber, C., Förste, C., Ellmer, W., Massmann, F.-H., Schwintzer, P., Muller, H.: Die Lösung (DGFII) 91L02, DGFII Intern. Bericht, Munchen, 1991.Google Scholar
- [8]Smith, D. E., Kolenkiewicz, R., Dunn, P. J., Robbins, J. W, Torrence, M. H., Klosko, S. M., Williamson, R. G., Pavlis, E. C., Douglas, N. B., Fricke, S. K.: Tectonic motion and deformation from satellite laser ranging to Lageos, J. Geoph. Res., 95, B13, 1990, p. 22013.Google Scholar
- [9]Gendt, G., Montag, H., Dick, G.: Plate kinematics in a global and European scale by LAGEOS laser ranging data from 1983 to 1990. Centr. of Space Geodesy to Geodynamics: Crustal Dynamics, Geodynamics 23, 1993, p. 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996