Network Design Models and Methods for Urban Traffic Management

  • Giulio E. Cantarella
  • Antonio Sforza
Conference paper
Part of the Transportation Analysis book series (TRANSANALY)

Abstract

In urban traffic planning and management the determination of network configuration (topology and link capacities), signal setting parameters (cycle time, green times and offsets) and link flow pattern is generally required. To this aim a set of models, belonging to the family of network design models, has to be defined. In these models the path choice user behaviour has to be taken into account, in order to define the link flow pattern. The signal setting contributes to the definition of the user costs (travel and delay costs) and assumes a relevant role in the path choice. For this reason the signal setting parameters (data and variables) should be explicitly included in the model formulation.

Keywords

Link Capacity Network Design Problem Link Length Signal Setting Traffic Assignment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Akcelik R., A New Look at Davidson’s Travel Time Function. Traffic Engng. Control 19, pp. 459–463, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Allsop R.E., Some Possibilities for Using Traffic Control to Influence Trip Destination and Route Choice. Proc. of the Sixth Int. Symp. on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 345–374, 1974.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Allsop R.E. and Charlesworth J.A., Traffic in a Signal Controlled Road Network: An Example of Different Signal Timing Inducing Different Routing. Traffic Engng. Control, 18, pp. 262–264, 1977.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Boyce D.E. (Editor). Transportation Network Design. Special Issue of Transportation Research B, 13B, 1, 1979.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Cantarella G.E. and Improta G., Capacity Factor and Cycle Time Optimization: A Graph Theory Approach, Transpn. Res. 22B, 1, pp. 1–23, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Cantarella G.E., Improta G. and Sforza A., Road Network Signal Setting: Equilibrium Conditions. Concyse Encyclopedia of Traffic and Transportation, M. Papageorgiou editor, pp.366–371. Pergamon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cantarella G.E., Improta G. and Sforza A., Iterative procedure for equilibrium network traffic signal setting. Transportation Research A, 25A, 5, pp. 241–249, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Cantarella G.E. and Sforza A., Methods for Equilibrium Network Traffic Signal Setting, in Flow Control on Congested networks, Odoni A.R. et al., eds., Springer & Verlag, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Cantarella G.E. and Sforza A., Traffic Assignment. Concyse Encyclopedia of Traffic and Transportation, M. Papageorgiou editor, pp. 513–520. Pergamon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Cantarella G.E. e Vitella F., Algoritmi genetici per il progetto delle reti di trasporlo ( in Italian); presented at Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society of Italy, Capri, 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Cascetta E., Metodi quantitativi per la pianificazione dei sistemi di trasporto(in Italian). Cedam, Padova, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Charlesworth J.A., Mutually Consistent Traffic Assignment and Signal Timings for a Signal -Controlled Road Network. Transport 152 Oper. Res. Group, Research Report n. 24. Newcastle, England, 1977.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Davidson K.B., A Flow-Travel Time Relationship for Use in Transportation Planning. Proc. 3rd Austr. Road Res. Board Conf. 3(1), pp. 183–194, 1966.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Dickson T.J., A Note on Traffic Assignment and Signal Timings in a Signal Controlled Road Network. Transpn. Res., 15B, pp. 267–271, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Fisk C.S., Game Theory and Transportation Systems Modelling. Transpn. Res.,18B, 4/5, pp. 301–313., 1984Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 274–297, 1976.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Gartner N.H., Gershwin S.B., Little J.D.C. and Ross P., Pilot Study of Computer-Based Urban Traffic Management. Transpn. Res., 14B, pp. 203–217, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Gartner N.H., Little J.D.C., and Gabbay H., Optimization of Traffic Signal Settings by Mixed Integer Linear Programming. Part I: The Network Coordination Problem; Part II: The Network Synchronization Problem, Trans. Sci., 9, pp. 321–363, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Harker P.T. and Friesz T.L., Bounding the Solution of the Continous Equilibrium Network Design Problem. Proc. of the Ninth Int. Symposium of Transportation and Traffic Theory, Delfth. VNU Science Press, pp. 233–252, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Heydecker B.G., Some Consequences of Detailed Junction Modelling in Road Traffic Assignment. Transpn. Sci., 17, 263–281, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Improta G., Signal Control at Individual Junctions: Phase - Based Approach. Coney se Encyclopedia of Traffic and Transportation, M. Papageorgiou editor, Pergamon Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Improta G. and Cantarella G.E., Control System Design for an Individual Signalized Junction. Transpn. Res. 18B, pp 147–167, 1984.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Improta G. and Sforza A., Optimal Offsets forTraffic Signal Systems in Urban Networks. Transpn. Res. 16B, pp. 143–161, 1982. 153Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Leblanc L.J. and Boyce D.E., A Bilevel Programming Algorithm for Exact Solution of the Network Design Problem with User Optimal Flows. Transpn. Res., 20B. 259–265, 1986.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Magnanti T. and Wong R., Network Design and Trasportation Planning Models and Algorithms. Transp. Sci. 18, 1–55, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Marcotte P., Network Optimization with Continuous Control Parameters. Transpn. Sci., 17, pp. 181–197, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Sheffi Y., Urban Transportation Networks. Prentice Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1985.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Smith M.J., The Existence of an Equilibrium Solution of the Traffic Assignment Problem when there are Junction Interactions. Transpn. Res., 15B, 443–451, 1981.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Smith M.J., Properties of a Traffic Control Policy which Ensure the Existence of a Traffic Equilibrium Consistent with the Policy. Transpn. Res., 15B, 453–462, 1981.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Smith M.J., Traffic Signals in Assignment Transpn. Res. 19B, pp.155–160, 1985.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Smith m.j., Van Vuren T., Heydecker B.J. and Van Vliet D., The onteraction between signal Control Policies and route Choice, in Transportation and raffic Theory, Gartner N.H., and wilson N.H.M., Elsevier, 1987.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    Tan H., Gershwin S.B. and Athans M., Hybrid Optimization in Urban Traffic Networks. Report No. DOT-TSC-RSP- 79–7, MIT Cambridge, MA, 1979.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Taylor M.A.P., A Note on Using Davidson Function in Equilibrium Assignment. Transpn. Res. 18B, pp. 181–199, 1984.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Vincent R.A., Mitchell A.I. and Robertson D.I., TRANSYT Version 8. Road Res. Lab. Rep.,LR 80, Crothorne, Berkshire, 1980.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Wardrop J.G., Some Theoretical Aspects of Road Traffic Research. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., Part. II, 1, pp. 325–378, 1952.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Webster F.V., Traffic Signal Setting. Road Research Technical Paper n. 39 HMSO, London, 1958.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Webster F.V. and Cobbe B.M., Traffic Signals. Road Research Technical Paper n. 56 HMSO, London, 1966.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulio E. Cantarella
    • 1
  • Antonio Sforza
    • 2
  1. 1.Dip. di Ingegneria dei Sistemi e MatematicaUniversità degli Studi di Reggio CalabriaReggio CalabriaItaly
  2. 2.Departimento di Informatica e SistemisticaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”NapoliItaly

Personalised recommendations