Cloning of a Dna Fragment Encoding γ-Glutamyl Kinase and γ-Glutamyl Phosphate Reductase from a Tomato cDNA Library

  • Mario G. García-Ríos
  • Laszlo N. Csonka
  • Ray A. Bressan
  • P. Christopher LaRosa
  • José Hanquier
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 86)


We cloned the gene encoding the first enzyme of proline synthesis from tomato (L. esculentum) by complementation of a proB mutation in E. coli with a λgt-11 cDNA library of tomato fruit. We obtained seven phages which were able to restore proline prototrophy to the proB mutant. The insert from one of the complementing phages, PRO1, was subcloned into plasmid pBluescript IIKS+ When transferred into a mutant ΔproBA (which is deficient in both the first and second enzymes of proline biosynthesis, γ-glutamyl kinase and γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase), the PRO1 gene was able to complement this deletion mutation. Assays of the coupled γ-glutamyl kinase/γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase activity of E. coli proB or ΔproBA mutant strains revealed that these strains have elevated levels of both γ-glutamyl kinase and γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase. These results indicate that the PRO1 gene is a hybrid locus which specifies both enzymatic activities.

Nucleotide sequence analysis revealed that the 5’ portion of the PRO1 locus contains an 849 bp open reading frame which has the coding capacity for a protein with extensive amino acid sequence similarities to γ-glutamyl kinase from E. coli, yeast and Δ1-pyrroline-5-caroboxylate synthetase from moth bean, and the 3’ region specifies a 1287 bp open reading frame with the coding capacity for a protein with extensive similarity to γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase from E. coli and Δ1-pyrroline-S-carboxylate synthetase from moth bean. Surprisingly, there is a TAA translation termination codon within the PRO1 region between the open reading frames that encode γ-glutamyl kinase and γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase. The structure of the PRO1 mRNA, which resembles polycistronic messages in prokaryotes, is unusual in eukaryotes because of difficulties in continuing translation across translation termination codons. As expected, in E. coli, the TAA codon is recognized as a translation terminator, so that in this host, the PRO1 mRNA is translated into two proteins with apparent molecular masses of 30 and 45 kd. We do not know the nature of the translation product of the PRO1 gene in plants: whether only the 30 kd γ-glutamyl kinase encoded at the 5’ end of the mRNA is made, whether the downstream γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase is translated as a separate polypeptide as a result of internal reinitiation, or whether the translation product is a long hybrid protein composed of γ-glutamyl kinase/γ-glutamyl phosphate reductase, which arose as a result of editing the TAA codon from the mRNA, by splicing or skipping over it by translational frameshifting.


Proline Biosynthesis Proline Synthesis Ribosomal Frameshifting Moth Bean Translation Termination Codon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ausubel FM, Brant R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K (1989) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bredenbeck PJ, Pachule CJ, Noten AFH, Charito J, Luytes W, Weiss SR, Spaan W (1990) The primary structure and expression of the second open reading frame of the polymerase gene of the coronavirus MHV-A5g; a highly conserved polymerase is expressed by an efficient ribosomal frameshifting mechanism. Nucl Acids Res 18: 1825–1831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang L-J, Pryciak P, Ganem D, Varmus HE (1989) Biosynthesis of the reverse transcriptase of hepatitis B viruses involves de novo translational initiation not ribosomal frameshifting. Nature 337: 364–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Csonka LN, Baich A (1983) Proline biosynthesis. In KM Herrmann, RL Somerville, eds, Amino Acids, Biosynthesis and Genetic Regulation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, pp 35–51Google Scholar
  5. Delauney AJ, Verma DPS (1990) A soybean Δ1pyrroline-S-carboxylate reductase gene was isolated by functional complementation in Escherichia coli and is found to be osmoregulated. Mol Gen Genet 221: 299–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Delauney AJ, Verma DPS (1993) Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. The Plant Journal 4: 215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delauney AJ, Hu CAA, Kisher PBK, Verma DPS (1993) Cloning of ornithine δ-aminotransferase cDNA from Vigna aconitifolia by trans-complementation in Escherichia coli and reulgation of proline synthesis. J Biol Chem 268: 18673–18678PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garcia-Rios MG, LaRosa PC, Bressan RA, Csonka LN, Hanquier J (1991) Cloning by complementation of the γ-glutamyl kinase gene from a tomato expression library. Abstracts, Third International Congress, International Society for Plant Molecular Biology. Tucson, Arizona, #1507Google Scholar
  9. Hu CA, Delauney A J, Verma DP (1992) A bifunctional enzyme (Δ1-pyrroline-S-carboxylate synthetase) catalyzes the first two steps of proline biosynthesis in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 9354–9358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huber W (1974) Influence of NaCl and abscisic acid treatment on proline metabolism and some further enzymes of amino acid metabolism in seedlings of Pennisetum typhoides. Planta 121: 225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacks T, Varmus H (1985) Expression of the Rous sarcoma virus pol gene by ribosomal frameshifting. Science 230: 1237–1242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kozak M (1992) A consideration of alternative models for the initiation of translation in eukaryotes. Crit Rev in Biochem and Mol Biol 27: 385–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krueger R, Jager H, Hintz J, Palich E (1986) Purification to homogeneity of pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase of barley. Plant Physiol 80: 142–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LaRosa PC, Rhodes D, Rhodes JC, Bressan RA, Csonka LN (1991) Elevated accumulation of proline in NaCl-adapted tobacco cells is not due to altered Δ1-pyrroline-S-carboxylate reductase. Plant Physiol 96: 245–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li W, Brandriss MC (1992) Proline biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: molecular analysis of the PROl gene, which encodes y-glutamyl kinase. J Bacteriol 174: 4148–4156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahan MJ, Csonka LN (1983) Genetic analysis of the proBA genes of Salmonella typhimurium; physical and genetic analyses of the cloned ProB+A+ genes of Escherichia coli and of a mutant allele that confers proline overproduction and enhanced osmotolerance. J Bacteriol 156: 1249–1262PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Priifer D, Tacke E, Schmitz J, Kull B, Kaufmann A, Rohde W (1992) Ribosomal frameshifting in plants: a novel signal directs the -1 frameshift in the synthesis of the putative viral replicase of potato leafroll luteovirus. EMBO J 11: 1111–1117Google Scholar
  18. Ragapati PJ, Stewart CR, Hack E (1989) Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase is in pea (Pisum sativum L.) leaf chloroplasts. Plant Physiol 91: 581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rhodes D, Myers AC, Jamieson G (1981) Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry of N-heptafluorobutyryl isobutyl esters of amino acids in the analysis of the kinetics of [15N]H4 assimilation in Lemna minor L. Plant Physiol 68: 1197–1205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodriguez RL, Tait RC (1983) Recombinant DNA Techniques: An Introduction, pp 192–194. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., Menlo Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  21. Szoke A, Miao G-H, Hong Z, Verma DPS (1992) Subcellular localization of Δ1-pyrroline-5- carboxylate reductase in root/nodule and leaf of soybean. Plant Physiol. 99: 1642–1649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Treichel S (1986) The influence of NaCl on Δ1-pyrroline-S-carboxylate reductase in prolineaccumulating cell suspension cultures of Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum and other halophytes. Plant Physiol 67: 173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williamson CL, Slocum RD (1992) Molecular cloning and evidence for osmoregulation of the Apyrroline-S-carboxylate (proC) gene in pea (Pisum sativum L.) Plant Physiol 100: 1464–1470PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario G. García-Ríos
    • 1
  • Laszlo N. Csonka
    • 1
  • Ray A. Bressan
    • 2
  • P. Christopher LaRosa
    • 2
    • 3
  • José Hanquier
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Department of HorticulturePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  3. 3.Plant Molecular Biology LaboratoryUSDABeltsvilleUSA
  4. 4.Eli Lilly & Co.IndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations