The Complexity Effect as an Indicator for the Parkinson Plus Syndrome
Abstract
Given the manifest slowing of motor functions in parkinsonian patients, it would seem only logical to measure reaction time and to take this as a basis for developing a scoring system to assess the pathological impairment caused by the disease. This has, of course, been done before, yet with contradictory results, since the nature of the stimulus-response situation affects the behavioral response in parkinsonian patients in a quite distinct manner [1]. Cognitive and motor elements are confounded in the reaction time, and separating the one from the other calls for sophisticated methods of mental chronometry [6,7]. Parkinsonian patients have particular problems with motor reactions if the situation is effort-demanding and self-directed, movements have to be initiated and organized in space, or the necessary movements are sequential, simultaneous, complex, or without visual feedback [2,3]. While other cerebrally impaired patients with focal or diffuse lesions and, notably, demented display marked deficits of varying degrees in all reaction tasks, parkinsonian patients are, under certain conditions, perfectly able to react in the same way as normal controls, providing the degenerative disease process does not exceed the nigrostriatal system and no additional cerebral lesions (“Parkinson plus” (PLUS)) exist [4,9–11].
Keywords
Complexity Effect Parkinsonian Patient Measure Reaction Time Nigrostriatal System Pyramidal Tract SignPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Benton A (1986) Reaction time and brain disease: some reflections. Cortex 22:129–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 2.Brown RG, Marsden CD (1990) Cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: from description to theory. Trends Neurosci 13:21–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Dubois B, Boller F, Pillon B, Agid Y (1991) Cognitive deficits in Parkinson’s disease. In: Boller F, Grafman J (eds) Handbook of neuropsychology, vol 5. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 195–240Google Scholar
- 4.Fischer PA (1986a) Long-term course in Parkinson’s syndrome and cerebral polypathy (Parkinson plus). Adv Neurol 45:235–238Google Scholar
- 5.Fischer PA (1986b) Progression und Polypathie beim Parkinson-Syndrom. In: Fischer PA (ed) Spätsyndrome der Parkinson-Krankheit. Editions Roche, Basel, pp 67–82Google Scholar
- 6.Meyer D, Osman AM, Irwin DE, Yantis S (1988) Modern mental chronometry. Biol Psychol 26:3–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Rafal RD, Posner MI, Walker JA, Friedrich FJ (1984) Cognition and the basal ganglia. Separating mental and motor components of performance in Parkinson’s disease. Brain 107:1083–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Raven JC (1985) Standard progressive matrices. Lewis, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ruß M, Fischer PA (1988) Reaktionszeitmessungen bei Parkinson-Kranken: der Komplexitätseffekt als Parkinson-plus-Indikator. In: Fischer PA (ed) Modifizierende Faktoren der Parkinson-Therapie. Editiones Roche, Basel, pp 149–160Google Scholar
- 10.Ruß M, Fischer PA (1989) Reaktionszeit und Aufgabenkomplexität: der Komplexitätseffekt als ein neuropsychologischer Indikator für den Schweregrad der zerebralen Beeinträchtigung. Z Diag Diff Psychol 10:145–153Google Scholar
- 11.Ruß M, Fischer PA (1990) Vergleichende testpsychologische Untersuchungen zur intellektuellen Leistungsfähigkeit von Parkinson-Kranken. Nervenarzt 61:88–93PubMedGoogle Scholar