Navier-Stokes Simulation and Measurement of Cone Drag at M = 7.9

  • C. Jessen
  • H. Grönig
  • M. Watanabe
  • K. Takayama
Conference paper

Abstract

The calculation of a M = 7.9 flow around a 30° cone in a shock tunnel is presented. It starts from the initial reservoir conditions obtained in the experiment in front of the nozzle. The nozzle flow is calculated using axisymmetric Euler equations, while the model flow is simulated by solving the Navier-Stokes equations. The results of this unsteady calculation are presented as plots of the Pitot pressure and velocity within the test section, as pressure contour plots around the cone at different instants and as plots of the friction drag, form drag and the drag coefficient. The latter is compared with an experimental result. The numerical procedure is described and the results are discussed in detail.

Key words

Cone flow Numerical simulation Nozzle starting process Cone drag 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. David CI, Robert MZ (1989) Conformal mapping and orthogonal grid generation. J. Propulsion 5:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Fletcher CAJ (1988) Computational techniques for fluid dynamics. Vol. II, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 431–432MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Jessen C, Grönig H (1993 a) A six component balance for short-duration hypersonic facilities. In: Boutier, A. (ed) New trends in instrumentation for hypersonic research, NATO ASI Series E, Vol. 224, Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  4. Jessen C, Grönig H (1993 b) Six component force measurement in the Aachen shock tunnel. These ProceedingsGoogle Scholar
  5. Yee HC (1987) Upwind and symmetric shock-capturing schemes. NASA TM 89464Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Jessen
    • 1
  • H. Grönig
    • 1
  • M. Watanabe
    • 2
  • K. Takayama
    • 2
  1. 1.StoßwellenlaborRWTH AachenAachenGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Fluid ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations