Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics pp 96-100 | Cite as
An Optimised Chemiluminescent Detection System: Is It Compatible with Data Generated Using 32P and a Different Ladder?
Conference paper
Abstract
Chemiluminescent detection systems are rapidly becoming the method of choice in VNTR analysis. Such systems offer considerable advantages over 32P labelled probes in terms of speed and safety. However, many laboratories have constructed large population databases using 32P techniques. It is important to verify that the results obtained using the chemiluminescent detection systems are directly compatible with those using 32P. This is particularly relevant if, as in this laboratory, a different molecular weight ladder has been used with each methodology.
Keywords
Fragment Size Chemiluminescent Detection System Position Assignment Molecular Weight Ladder 10ml Hybridisation Buffer
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Budowle B & Stafford J. Response to expert report by DL Hartl. Crime Laboratory Digest (1991) 18 101–108Google Scholar
- 2.Greenhalgh MJ. The effects of using different molecular weight markers in DNA profiling. In: Advances in Forensic Haemogenetics 4 (eds. C Rittner & PM Schneider) Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (1992) pp140–141Google Scholar
- 3.Syndercombe Court D, Fedor T, Gouldstone M, Lincoln PJ, Phillips CP, Tate V, Thomson JA & Watts PH. Investigation of the between-gel and within-gel variation in fragment size determinations found when using single locus DNA probes. For. Sci. Int. (1992) 53 173–191Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994