Cellular Automata (Q2R and Creutz)

  • Dietrich Stauffer
  • Friedrich W. Hehl
  • Nobuyasu Ito
  • Volker Winkelmann
  • John G. Zabolitzky

Abstract

In the simulations of the previous chapter we kept the temperature constant, and thus the energy fluctuated in the “canonical ensemble”. Now we deal with “micro-canonical” alternatives which keep the energy constant and thus have a fluctuating temperature. This method gives us an opportunity to introduce deterministic cellular automata. Those are lattices where each site k carries an integer variable S k , called a spin, which has a limited number of values it can take. We let it be either -1 or +1 (or 0 and 1). The time t proceeds in steps of one and thus is also an integer. For time t + 1 the spin at site k gets a value determined uniquely from the spin values of its neighbors at time t, and in some models also from its own orientation S k (t) at time t. For example, on an L*L square lattice with nearest neighbors k - 1, k + 1, k - L and k + L of site k (see Introduction), deterministic cellular automata are defined by the rule
$$ {S_k}(t + 1) = {f_k}[{S_{{k - 1}}}(t),{S_{{k + 1}}}(t),{S_{{k - L}}}(t),{S_{{k + L}}}(t),{S_{{k + L}}}(t),{S_k}(t)] $$
.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dietrich Stauffer
    • 1
  • Friedrich W. Hehl
    • 1
  • Nobuyasu Ito
    • 2
  • Volker Winkelmann
    • 3
  • John G. Zabolitzky
    • 4
  1. 1.Institut für Theoretische PhysikUniversität zu KölnKölnGermany
  2. 2.Computing and Information Systems CenterJapan Atomic Energy Research InstituteTokai, IbarakiJapan
  3. 3.Regionales RechenzentrumUniversität zu KölnKölnGermany
  4. 4.Botec EngineeringOttobrunnGermany

Personalised recommendations