The Valuation of Environmental Externalities in Utility Regulation

  • Paul Chernick
  • Emily Caverhill
Conference paper

Abstract

Monetizing environmental externalities provides an approximation of the societal value of reducing impacts on human health and the environment from electirical enrgy supply, including utility and non-utility fossil-fired generation, demand-side management and off-system power purchases. A dollar estimate of the full societal cost of the supply option is established by placing a value on the air, water and terrestrial effects of each supply option and adding that to the option’s capital, operating and maintenance costs. Repeating this exercise allows different electric power supply options to be compared on a full-societal cost basis. In monetization, these externalities are expressed as a cost/unit of the externality, such as $/lb of emissions of $/gal of water consumed, and the full societal cost is usually stated as a cost/kWh generated.

Keywords

Marginal Cost Global Warming Potential Utility Regulation Supply Option Implied Valuation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Chernick, P., and E. Caverhill. 1989. The valuation of Externalities from Energy Production, Delivery and Use. PLC, Incorporate, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chernick, P., and E. Caverhill. 1990a. Report to the Boston Gas Company on Including Externalities in 89–239.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grupp, H. 1986. “Die sozialen Kosten des Verkehrs”. Verkehr und Technik, Teil 1 und 2, in.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hendrey, G.R. 1988. “Acid Deposition: A National Problem” Acid Deposition: Environmental, Economic and Policy Issues. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hohmeyer, O. 1988. Social Costs of Energy Consumption: The External Effects of Electricity Generation in the Federal Republic of Germany. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lashof, D.A., and D.R. Ahuja. 1990. “Relative Global Warming Potentials of Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Nature. 344(6266):529–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ottinger, R. et al. 1990. Environmental Externality Costs from Electric Utility Operations.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krause, F. W. Bach and J. Koomey. 1989. Energy Policy in the Greenhouse, Volume 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Chernick
    • 1
  • Emily Caverhill
    • 1
  1. 1.Resource Insight, INC. (formerly PLC, Inc.)BostonUSA

Personalised recommendations