The Application of Correspondence Analysis: Some Examples in Archaeology

  • Karen Høilund Nielsen
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

The utility of the Correspondence Analysis (CA) for chronological purposes is discussed on a basis of archaeological material, i.e. female graves with jewellery, and jewellery with cast ornaments. In connection with the female graves theoretical and interpretational problems are also discussed.

Keywords

Principal Axis Correspondence Analysis Archaeological Material Stylistic Analysis Interpretational Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Høilund Nielsen, K. (1987): Zur Chronologie der Jüngeren Germanischen Eisenzeit auf Bornhohn. Untersuchungen zu Schmuckgarnituren. Acta Archaeologica vol. 57, 1986.Google Scholar
  2. Høilund Nielsen, K. (1988): Correspondence analysis applied to hoards and graves of the Germanic Iron Age. In: Madsen, T. (ed): Multivariate Archaeology. Numerical Appreoaches in Scandinavian Archaeology. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXI. Højbjerg.Google Scholar
  3. Høilund Nielsen, K. (1989): Korrespondensanalyse — en kronologisk metode. KARK Nyhedsbrev nr. 3 1989, Højbjerg.Google Scholar
  4. Høilund Nielsen, K. (1990): Korrespondensanalyse — en kronologisk metode. Nogle metodiske over-vejelser vedrørende multivariable analyser af gravfundsmateriale, eksempler herpå samt et eksempel på Stilanalyse. Arkæologiske skrifter, Kbh’s Universitet.Google Scholar
  5. Høilund Nielsen, K. (forthcoming): Art and Society, (in preparation).Google Scholar
  6. Madsen, T. (1986): EDB-analyserne. Per Ethelberg: Hjemsted — en gravplads fra 4. og 5. årh.e.Kr. Skrifter fra museumsraedet for Sønderjyllands amt, 2. Haderslev.Google Scholar
  7. Madsen, T. (1988) (ed.): Multivariate Archaeology. Numerical Approaches in Scandinavian Archaeology. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXI. Højbjerg.Google Scholar
  8. Madsen, T. (1989A): Seriation — en grundlæggende arkæologisk arbejdsmetode. KARK Nyhedsbrev nr. 3, 1989, Højbjerg.Google Scholar
  9. Madsen, T. (1989B): Era data til fædigt arbejde. KARK Nyhedsbrev nr. 3 1989, Højbjerg.Google Scholar
  10. Nerman, B. (1969): Die Vendelzeit Gotlands II. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  11. Nerman, B. (1975): Die Vendelzeit Gotlands 1:1, udgivet af Agneta Lundström. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  12. Salin, B. (1904): Die Altgermanische Thierornamentik. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  13. 0rsnes, M. (1966): Form og stil i Sydskandinaviens yngre germanske jernalder. København.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Høilund Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Afdeling for Forhistorisk Arkæologi MoesgårdHøjbjergGermany

Personalised recommendations