Limb Salvage pp 781-787 | Cite as

Recurrence Detection of Malignant Mesenchymal Neoplasms in MRI and CT

  • W. Mutschler
  • G. Reuther
Conference paper

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as computed tomography (CT) have proven to be of great value in the diagnostic workup of primary tumors of the musculoskeletal system [1, 5]. Both imaging methods are valuable for the assessment of local tumor extent [4] and are helpful to a certain degree for tissue characterization [6].

Keywords

Neoplastic Tissue Malignant Mesenchymal Neoplasm Recurrence Detection Innominate Bone Local Tumor Extent 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aisen AM, Martel W, Braunstein EM, McMillin KI, Philips WA, Kling TF (1986) MRI and CT evaluation of primary bone and soft tissue tumors. AIR 146: 749–756Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beltran J, Noto AM, Chatteries DW, Chakeres AJ (1987) Tumors of the osseous spine. Staging with MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 162: 565–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohndorf K, Reiser M, Lochner B, de Lacroix WF, Steinbrich W (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging of primary tumours and tumour-like lesions of bone. Skeletal Radiol 15: 511–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Demas BE, Heelan RT, Lane J, Marcove R, Hajdu S, Murray FB (1988) Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: comparison of MR and CT in determining the extent of disease. AIR 10: 615–620Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Petterson MO, Gillespy T, Hamlin DJ, Enneking WF, Springfield DS, Andrew ER, Spanier S, Hone R (1987) Primary musculoskeletal tumors: examination with MR imaging compared with conventional modalities. Radiology 164: 237–241Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reuther G, Mutschler W (1989) Radiomorphological classification of central chondrosarcomas. Fortschrbeb Röntgenstr 150: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vanel D, Lacombe M-J, Couanet D, Kalifa C, Spielmann M, Genin J (1987) Musculoskeletal tumors: follow-up with MR imaging after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy. Radiology 164: 243–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zimmer WD, Berquist TH, McLeod RA et al. (1985) Bone tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography. Radiology 155: 709–718PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Mutschler
    • 1
  • G. Reuther
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of UlmUlmGermany
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyUniversity of UlmUlmGermany

Personalised recommendations