Recognition and Response between Host and Parasite as Determinants in Resistance and Disease Development

  • C. H. Beckman
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 28)

Abstract

The entire metabolic organization that characterizes life forms is dependent upon the capacity to detect ambient conditions, or changes in ambient conditions, and respond appropriately. This capacity is readily apparent in interactions between vascular parasites and potential hosts. Soil-borne, fungal, root parasites, for example produce thick-walled, resting structures that can survive in a dormant state for long periods of time. As plant roots ramify through the soil, root cap cells are sloughed off and root exudates leach out of these cells and from young roots in a gradient that may extend a millimeter or two from the root surface (Griffin 1969). The resting spores are able to detect the presence of these nutrients (and probably the gradient) and respond by rapid germination (Griffin 1981), growth toward the source, and colonization of the root rhizosphere, thizoplane, and to varying degrees, cells of the epidermis, cortex (Gerik 1984; Gerik and Huisman 1985) and, sometimes, vascular tissues. These precesses, and the invasion of the vascular elements is apparently enhanced by senescence (Hepple 1963) or nematode infestation of roots (Bergeson et al 1970; Conroy et al 1972). When tissues have been invaded for some time and nutrients, especially carbohydrates, become depleted, cells of the parasites are rapidly converted into new, thick-walled, resting structures (Meyers and Cook 1972) to await the arrival of a new nutrient source. Thus, these parasites possess a remarkable system of recognition and response that permits them to take advantage of sometimes fleeting nutrient sources.

Keywords

Fusarium Oxysporum Susceptible Cultivar Secondary Xylem Callose Deposit Reed Canarygrass 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beckman CH (1987) The Nature of Wilt Diseases of Plants. 175 pp. APS Press, St Paul, MN, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  2. Beckman CH, Halmos S and Mace ME (1962) The interaction of host, pathogen, and soil temperature in relation to susceptibility to Fusarium wilt of bananas. Phytopathology 52: 134–140Google Scholar
  3. Beckman CH, Mueller WC, Tessier BJ and Harrison NA (1982) Recognition and callose deposition in response to vascular infection in fusarium wilt-resistant or susceptible tomato plants. Physiol Plant Pathol 20: 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beckman CH, Verdier PA and Mueller WC (1988) A system of defense in depth provided by vascular parenchyma cells in response to vascular infection with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, race 1. Physiol Mole Plant Pathol (in Press)Google Scholar
  5. Bergeson GB, Van Gundy SD and Thomason IJ (1970) Effect of Meloidogyne javanica on rhizosphere microflora and Fusarium-wilt of tomato. Phytopathology 60: 1245–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Conroy JJ, Green RJ, Jr and Ferris JM (1972) Interaction of Verticillium albo-atrum and the root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus penetrans, in tomato roots at controlled inoculum densities. Phytopathology 62:362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damian RT (1979) Molecular mimicry in biological adaptation. Pages 103–126 in: Host-parasite Interfaces. Nickol BB (ed) Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. DeVay JE, Schnathorst WC and Foda MS (1967) Common antigens and host-parasite interactions. In: The Dynamic Role of Molecular Constituents in Plant-Parasite Interaction. Microcha CJ and Uritani I (eds). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  9. DeVay JE, Wakeman RJ, Kavanaugh JA and Charudattan R (1981) The tissue and cellular location of a major cross-reactive antigen shared by cotton and soil-borne fungal parasites. Physiol Plant Pathol 18: 59–66Google Scholar
  10. Gerik JS (1984) Fungal colonization of the cotton root system with emphasis on Verticillium dahliae. PhD Thesis, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Gerik JS and Huisman OC (1985) Mode of colonization of roots by Verticillium and Fusarium. Pages 80–83 in: Ecology and Management of Soilborne Plant Pathogens. CA Parker, AD Rovira, KJ Moore, PTW Wong and JS Kollmorgen (eds). American Phytopathological Society, St Paul, MNGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffin GJ (1969) Fusarium oxysporum and Aspergillus flavus spore germination in the rhizosphere of peanut. Phytopathology 59: 1214–1218PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffin GJ (1981) Physiology of conidium and chlamydospore germination in Fusarium. Pages 331–339 in: Fusarium: Diseases, Biology and Taxonomy. PE Nelson, TA Toussoun and RJ Cook (eds). Pennsylvania State University Press, University ParkGoogle Scholar
  14. Griffiths DA (1971) The development of lignitubers in roots after infection by Verticillium dahliae Kleb. Can J Microbiol 17: 441–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hepple S (1963) Infection of pea plants by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pisi in naturally infested soil. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 46: 585–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heslop-Harrison J (1966) Cytoplasmic continuities during spore formation in flowering plants. Endeavor 25: 65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyers JA and Cook RJ (1972) Induction of chlamydospore formation in Fusarium solani by abrupt removal of the organic carbohydrate substrate. Phytopathology 62: 1148–1153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mueller WC and Beckman CH (1988) Correlated light and electron microscope studies of callose deposits in vascular parenchyma cells of tomato plants inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Physiol Mole Plant Pathol tin press)Google Scholar
  19. Talboys PW (1958) Some mechanisms contributing to Verticillium-resistance in the Hop roots. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 41: 227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tjamos EC and Smith IM (1975) The expression of resistance to Verticillium albo-atrum in monogenically resistant tomato varieties. Physiol Plant Pathol 6: 215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vance CP and Sherwood RT (1977) Lignified papilla formation as a mechanism for protection in reed canarygrass. Physiol Plant Pathol 10: 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Beckman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of Rhode IslandKingstonUSA

Personalised recommendations