Radical Surgery for Extensive Rectal Cancer: Is It Worthwhile?

  • F. L. MoffatJr.
  • R. E. Falk
Part of the Recent Results in Cancer Research book series (RECENTCANCER, volume 146)

Abstract

In a small proportion of patients with extensive primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer, disease remains confined to the pelvis for a prolonged period. Symptoms are highly prejudicial to quality of life and often refractory to treatment short of extirpative surgery. Cure requires en bloc excision of all involved pelvic viscera with tumor-free margins. The pelvic exenterations (PE) are the most radical operations for rectal cancer. PE carries a high risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality, and has profound functional, psychological, and psychosexual implications for patients. Careful preoperative counseling regarding surgical risks and the impact of PE on body function and image is indispensable; the patient’s consent must be truly informed. Patients with major medical or psychiatric/emotional comorbidity and those who are mentally incompetent are not candidates. Tenesmus and central pel-vic/perineal pain are amenable to PE whereas radicular pain is not; sciatica and lower extremity lymphedema portend unresectability. Extrapelvic disease should be excluded preoperatively. While invaded sacrum can be resected en bloc with involved viscera (sacropelvic exenteration), fixity of tumor to the pelvic sidewall(s) in nonirradiated patients almost invariably implies unresectability. Other contraindications to PE include invasion of the proximal (S1 or higher) lumbosacral spine or lumbosacral plexus/sciatic nerves, ureteric obstruction proximal to the ureterovesical junctions, and encasement of the external or common iliac vessels by tumor. PE for advanced primary rectal carcinoma yields 5-year survival of over 40%; when performed for recurrent disease, long-term salvage rates are not as high. While radical surgery is rarely indicated for palliation, PE in carefully selected (good performance status and life expectancy, complete excision of all gross disease) incurable patients results in abrogation of disabling symptoms and reasonable intervals of high-quality survival.

Keywords

Rectal Cancer Rectal Carcinoma Urinary Diversion Pelvic Exenteration Computerize Tomo 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boey J, Wong J, Ong GB (1982) Pelvic exenteration for locally advanced colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 195: 513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brophy PF, Hoffman JP, Eienberg BL (1994) The role of palliative pelvic exenteration. Am J Surg 167:386–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deckers PJ, Olsson C, Williams LA et al (1976) Pelvic exenteration as palliation of malignant disease. Am J Surg 131:509–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eckhauser FE, Lindenauer SM, Morly GW (1979) Pelvic exenteration for advanced rectal scarcinoma. Am J Surg 138:411–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Falk RE, Moffat EL, Makowka L et al (1985) Pelvic exenteration for advanced primary and recurrent adenocarcinoma. Can J Surg 28:539–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gall FP, Tonak J, Altendorf A (1987) Multivisceral resections in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Recturn 30:337–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hafner GH, Herrera L, Petrelli NJ (1991) Patterns of recurrence after pelvic exenteration for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Arch Surg 126:1510–1513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hafner GH, Herrera L, Petrelli NJ (1992) Morbidity and mortality after pelvic exenteration for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg 215:63–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunter JA, Ryan, JA, Schultz P (1987) En bloc resection of colon cancer adherent to other organs. Am J Surg 154:67–71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jakowatz JG, Porudominsky D, Riihimaki DU et al (1985) Complications of pelvic exenteration Arch Surs 120:1261–1265Google Scholar
  11. Ketcham AS, Deckers PJ, Sugarbaker EV et al (1970) Pelvic exenteration for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Cancer 26:513–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kiselow M, Butcher HR, Bricker EM (1967) Results of radical surgical treatment of advanced pelvic cancer: a fifteen year study. Ann Surg 166:428–436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ledesma EL, Bruno S, Mittelman A (1981) Total pelvic exenteration in colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 194:701–703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindsey WF, Wood DK, Briele HA, et al (1985) Pelvic exenteration. J Surg Oncol 30:231–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu SY, Wang YN, Zhu WQ, Gu WL, Fu H (1994) Total pelvic exenteration for locally ad-vanred rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 37:172–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lopez MJ, Kraybill WG, Downey RS, Johnston WD, Bricker EM. (1987) Exenteratlve surgery for locally advanced rectosigmoid cancers. Is it worthwhile? Surgery 102:644–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. McGlone TP, Bernie WA, Elliott DW (1982) Survival following extended operations for ex-tracolonic invasion by colon cancer. Arch Surg 117:595–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Moffat FL Vargas-Cuba RD, Serafini AN et al (1994a) Radioimrnunodetection of colorectal carcinoma using technetium-99m-labeled Fab’ fragments of the IMMU-4 anticarcmoem-bvonic antigen monoclonal antibody. Cancer 73:836–845PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moffat FL, Yeung RS, Falk RE, Ketcham AS (1994b) Exenterative surgery for recurrent pelvic neoplasia. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 3:277–290Google Scholar
  20. Olslon C, Deckers PJ, Williams L et al (1976) New look at pelvic exenteration. Urology 7:355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pearfma NW (1994) Complications of pelvic exenteration. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 3:347–356Google Scholar
  22. Pearfman NW, Donohue RE, Stiegmann GV et al (1987) Pelvic and sacropelvic exenteration for locallv advanced or recurrent anorectal cancer. Arch Surg 122:537–541Google Scholar
  23. Pearlnrii NW, Donohue RE, Wettlaufer JN et al (1990) Continent üeocolonic urinary reservoirs for filling and lining the post-exenterative pelvis. Am J Surg 160:634–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Takagi H, Morimoto T, Yasue M, Kato K, Yamada E, Suzuki R (1985) Total pelvic exenteration for advanced carcinoma of the lower colon. J Surg Oncol 28:59–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Temple WJ, Ketcham AS (1992) Sacral resection for control of pelvic tumors. Am J Surg 163:370–374PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vera MI (1981) Quality of life following pelvic exenteration. Gynecol Oncol 12:355–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wanebo HJ, Koness RJ, Turk PS, Cohen SI (1992) Composite resection of posterior pelvic malignancy. Ann Surg 215:685–695PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wanebo H J, Koness J, Vezeridis MP, Cohen SI, Wrobleski DE (1994) Pelvic resection of recurrent rectal cancer. Ann Surg 220:586–597PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams LF, Huddleston CB, Sawyers JL, Potts JR, Sharp KW, McDougal SW (1988) Is total pelvic exenteration reasonable primary treatment for rectal carcinoma? Ann Surg 207:670–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yeung RS, Moffat FL, Falk RE (1993) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent and extensive primary colorectal adenocarcinoma. Cancer 72:1853–1858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeung RS, Moffat FL, Falk RE (1994) Pelvic exenteration for recurrent colorectal carcinoma: a review. Cancer Invest 12:176–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. L. MoffatJr.
    • 1
  • R. E. Falk
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Surgical Oncology (310T)University of MiamiMiamiUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Toronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations