Behavioral and Pharmacological Analysis of the Stinging Response in Africanized and Italian Bees

  • N. Balderrama
  • H. Díaz
  • A. Sequeda
  • J. Núnez
  • H. Maldonado

Abstract

Sensitivity to a noxious stimulus was determined for the stinging response of Africanized and Italian bees. The more “aggressive” Africanized bees proved to be less sensitive (i.e., they responded with fewer stinging responses) than the more “gentle” Italian bees to the same nociceptive stimulation. Italian bees showed positive correlation of sensitivity with nectar flow during the year and the same seems to be true for Africanized bees during the day. Results obtained after morphine and naloxone + morphine treatment on bees suggest the existence of an endorphinic system for pain modulation, but its implication for the observed sensitivity changes is not yet known.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. (1).
    Boch, R., and Rothenbuhler, W.C. 1974. Defensive behaviour and production of alarm pheromone in honeybees. J. Apic. Res. 13: 217–221.Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    Brandeburgo, M.A.M.; Goncalves, L.S.; and Kerr, W.E. 1976. Nota sobre o estudo do efeito das condicoes climáticas sobre a agressividade das abelhas africanizadas. Cienc. Cult. Sao Paulo 28: 276–277.Google Scholar
  3. (3).
    Collins, A.M.; Rinderer, Th.E.; Harbo, J.R.; and Bolten, A.B. 1982. Colony defense by africanized and european honeybees. Science 218; 72–74.Google Scholar
  4. (4).
    Collins, A.M.; Rinderer, Th.E.; Tucker, K.W.; Sylvester, H.A.; and Lackett, J.J. 1980. A model of honeybee defensive behaviour. J. Apic. Res. 19: 224–231.Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    Collins, A.M., and Rothenbuhler, W.C. 1978. Laboratory test of the response to an alarm chemical, isopentyl acetate, by Apis mellifera. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 71: 906–909.Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    Fletcher, J.C. 1978. The African bee, Apis mellifera adansonii, in Africa. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 23: 151–171.Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    Maldonado, H., and Miralto, A. 1982. Effect of morphine and naloxone on a defensive response of the mantis shrimp (Squilla mantis). J. Comp. Physiol. 147: 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. (8).
    Michener, C.D. 1975. The Brazilian bee problem. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 20: 399–416.Google Scholar
  9. (9).
    Núnez, J.A. 1977. Circadian variation of flight activity in colonies of Apis mellifera ligustica. J. Insect Physiol. 23: 387–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. (10).
    Núnez, J.A. 1982. Foraging pressure and its annual variation. J. Apic. Res. 21: 134–138.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Núnez, J.A.; Maldonado, H.; Miralto, A.; and Balderrama, N. 1983. The stinging response of the honeybee: effects of morphine, naloxone and some opioid peptides. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 19: 921–924.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Padilla, A.G. 1985. Variacion anual en respuestas evocadas por feromonas de alar ma en Apis mellifera. M.Sc. Thesis, UCV, Maracay-Venezeula.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Rothenbuhler, W.C. 1960. A technique for studying genetics of colony behavior in honey bees. Am. Bee J. 100: 176–198.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Stort, A.C. 1970. q Metodologia para o estudo da genética da aggressividade de Apis. mellifera. Anais 1°Congr. Bras. Apic. Florianopolis.SC: 36–51.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Zabala, N.A.; Miralto, A.; Maldonado, H.; Nunez, J.A.; Jaffé, K.; and Calderon, L. de C. 1984. Opiate receptor in praying mantis: effect of morphine and naloxone. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 20: 683–687.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heildelberg 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Balderrama
    • 1
  • H. Díaz
    • 1
  • A. Sequeda
    • 1
  • J. Núnez
    • 2
  • H. Maldonado
    • 2
  1. 1.Lab. Fisiol. InsectosInstituto de Zoología Agrícola, Facultad de Agronomía (UCV)Maracay, Edo. AraguaVenezuela
  2. 2.Departamento de BiologíaFCEN (UNBA)Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations