An Economic Model to Measure Costs and Benefits of Eradication

  • Richard L. Farnsworth
Conference paper
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 11)

Abstract

Fruit flies can be found in most fruit producing regions throughout the world. Countries such as the United States and Mexico use quarantines, monitoring, and eradication programs to prevent entry of fruit flies, particularly medfly. Other countries with permanent populations frequently entertain notions of large-scale eradication programs. This paper discusses the use of economic tools within a systematic decision framework to measure the costs and benefits of eradication programs. Several conclusions follow from the review and economic analysis. First, a systematic decision framework can aide researchers and policymakers define and structure the problem. Second, eradication programs can affect groups within and outside of agriculture; a comprehensive assessment of the associated costs and benefits should include all relevant impacts. Finally, a comprehensive analysis requires multidiscip1inary teams to develop basic biological data, identify conflicting objectives, and measure the social, economic, and environmental consequences.

Keywords

Equilibrium Price Consumer Surplus Demand Curve Supply Curve Payoff Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Awadallah, A. et. al. 1983. “A Survey of Crop Losses Caused by the Mediterranean Fruit Fly in Egypt.” Prepared for the Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Isotope and Radiation Group, 2l June.Google Scholar
  2. Carlson, G.A. and L. Suguiyama. 1985. “Economic Evaluation of Area Wide Cotton Insect Managements Boll Weevi1s in the Southeastern United States.” North Carolina Agricultural Research Service Bulletin 473, June.Google Scholar
  3. Collins, G.S. and C.R. Taylor. 1983. “TECHSIM: A Regional Field Crop and National Livestock Econometric Simulation Model.” Agricultural Economics Research 35:2 (April), pp.1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Consortium for International Crop Protection. 1985. Eradication of the Tri—Fly Complex From The State of Hawaii: Draft Environmental Impact Statement. Prepared for the Plant Protection and Quarantine, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  5. Just, R.E., Hueth, D. L. and Schmitz, A. 1982. Applied Welfare Economics and Public Policy. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Kenney, R.L. and Raiffa, H. 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  7. MacCrimmon, K.R. 1973. “An Overview of Multiple Objective Decision Making.” Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Edited by J. L. Cochrane and M. Zeleny. Columbia, South Carolina: University of South Carolina Press, pp. 16–44.Google Scholar
  8. McDowell, R. and Pirie C. 1985. “Benefit-Cost Analysis of Medfly Eradication in Central America.” Prepared by the Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation Staff, Budget and Accounting Division, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 4 March.Google Scholar
  9. Marschak, J. and Radner, R. 1972. Economic Theory of Teams. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Savage, L.J. 1954. The Foundations of Statistics. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Schmitz, A. and Seckler, D. 1970. “Mechanized Agriculture and Social Welfare: The Case of the Tomato Harvester.” American Journal Agricultural Economics, 54:4, pp. 569–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Taylor, C. R., et. al. 1983. “Aggregate Economic Effects of Alternative Boll Weevil Management Strategies.” Agricultural Economics Research, 35:2 (April), pp. 19–28.Google Scholar
  13. Trueman, R.E. 1974. An Introduction to Quantitative Methods for Decision Making. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. United Nations Development Programme. 1973. “Peru Fruit Fly Eradication: Report of the Evaluation Mission.” May.Google Scholar
  15. Wallace, M.C., et. Al. 1977. “The Mediterranean Fruit Fly and its Economic Impact on Central American Countries and Panama.” Prepared for the United States Agency for International Development by the UC/AID Pest Management and Related Environmental Protection Project at the University of California, Berkeley, under Contract AID/ta-C-1380. May.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Farnsworth
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations