Advertisement

Abstract

It is clear from the preceding chapters that the relative population of the lowest energy levels of paramagnetic ions depends on both the temperature and the strength of the external magnetic field. The equilibrium states of a system can often be described by three variables, of which only two are independent. For the common example of the ideal gas, the variables are pVT (pressure, volume, temperature). For magnetic systems, one obtains HMT (magnetic field, magnetization, temperature) as the relevant variables and the thermodynamic relations derived for a gas can be translated to a magnetic system by replacing p by H and V by — M. In the next section we review a number of the thermodynamic relations. Then, two sections are used to demonstrate the usefulness of these relations in analyzing experiments. In fact the simple thermodynamic relations are often applicable, even to magnetic systems that require a complicated model to describe the details of their behavior [1].

Keywords

Magnetic System Thermodynamic Relation Magnetic Contribution Adiabatic Demagnetization Lattice Heat Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    General references for this chapter include Morrish A.H, (1965) Physical Principles of Magnetism, J. Wiley and Sons, New York; de Klerk D., Handbuch der Physik, Vol. XV, p. 38Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kapadnis D.G. and Hartmans R., Physica 22, 173 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stout J.W. and Catalano E., J. Chem. Phys. 23,2013 (1955); see also, Boo W.OJ. and Stout J.W., J. Chem. Phys. 65, 3929 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bloembergen P. and Miedema A.R., Physica 75, 205 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kopinga K, de Neef T., and de Jonge WJ.M., Phys. Rev. B11, 2364 (1975)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Jonge WJ.M, Swüste C.H.W., Kopinga K, and Takeda K, Phys. Rev. B12,5858 (1975); see also, Kopinga K, van der Leeden P, and de Jonge W.J.M, Phys. Rev. B14, 1519 (1976)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giauque W.F. and MacDougall D.P., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 57, 1175 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zemansky M.W, (1968), 5th Ed.: Heat and Thermodynamics, McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stout J.W. and Hadley W.B, J. Chem. Phys. 40, 55 (1964); see also Fisher R.A., Hornung E.W., Brodale G.E, and Giauque W.F, J. Chem. Phys. 46, 4945 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McElearney J.N, Schwartz R.W, Siegel A.E, and Carlin R.L, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 93, 4337 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooke A.H, Meyer H, and Wolf W.P, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A237, 404 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    More details are provided in the books cited earlier on EPR spectroscopy as well as in Chapt. 2 of Carlin R.L. and van Duyneveldt A.J, (1977) Magnetic Properties of Transition Metal Compounds, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Carlin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations