Prognostic Relevance of Invasive and Noninvasive Data in Angiographically Defined Subgroups of Coronary Heart Disease Patients
Abstract
The extent of coronary disease and the degree of left ventricular dysfunction are important determinants of survival in patients with coronary artery disease (Bruschke et al. 1973a, b; Burggraf and Parker 1975; Hammermeister et al. 1977; Mock et al. 1982; Murphy et al. 1977; Proudfît et al. 1978). The results of exercise testing also correlate with the subsequent development of coronary events in a normal population (McDonald 1979) and in different groups of patients with coronary disease (Cole and Ellestadt 1978; Samek et al. 1975; Starling et al. 1980; Payne et al. 1978; Weiner et al. 1978; Tubau et al. 1980). This correlation has been related to the fact that exercise tests are more often positive in patients with multi-vessel disease (Starling et al. 1980) and patients with multi-vessel disease are more likely to have a poor prognosis.
Keywords
Maximal Heart Rate Significant Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Heart Disease Patient Multivessel Disease Severe Left Ventricular DysfunctionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- AHA Committee Report (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Circulation 51 (April): 5Google Scholar
- Bruschke AYG, Proudfit WL, Sones FM Jr (1973a) Progress study of 590 consecutive non-surgical cases of coronary disease followed 5–9 years. I. Arteriographic correlations. Circulation 47: 1147PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bruschke AYG, Proudfit WL, Sones FM Jr (1973b) Progress study of 590 consecutive non-surgical cases of coronary disease followed 5–9 years. II. Ventriculographic and other correlations. Circulation 47: 1154PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Burggraf WL, Parker JO (1975) Prognosis in coronary artery disease. Angiographic, hemodynamic and clinical factors. Circulation 51: 146PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cole JP, Ellestad M (1978) Significance of chest pain during treadmill exercise: Correlation with coronary events. Am J Cardiol 41: 227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins D, Peduzzi P, Detre K (1980) A computer program for comparing survival experience of two groups after adjustment for relevant covariates. Comp Programs Biomed 11: 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cutler S, Ederer F (1958) Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 8: 699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables. J Roy Statist Soc 34: 187Google Scholar
- European Coronary Surgery Study Group (1980) Prospective randomized study of coronary artery bypass surgery in stable angina pectoris. Second interim report. Lancet II: 491Google Scholar
- Friesinger GC, Page EE, Ross RS (1970) Prognostic significance of coronary arteriography. Trans Assoc Am Physicians 83: 78PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gensini GE (1975) Coronary arteriography. Futura, New York, p 271Google Scholar
- Hammermeister KE, DeRouen TA, Murray JA, Dodge HT (1977) Effect of coronary saphenous vein bypass grafting on death and sudden death. Am J Cardiol 39: 925PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaltenbach M (1975) Quantitative Bewertung koronarangiographischer Befunde mit Hilfe eines Punktesystems (Score). Z Kardiol 64: 597PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Koppes GM, Kruyer W, Beckmann CH, Jones FG (1980) Response to exercise early after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction in patients receiving no medication: Long-term follow-up. Am J Cardiol 46: 764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mantel N, Haenszel W (1959) Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. JNCI 22: 719PubMedGoogle Scholar
- McDonald L (1979) Very early recognition of coronary heart disease. In: Yu P, Goodwin J (eds) Progress in cardiology, vol 8. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 147Google Scholar
- Mock MB, participants of the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (1982) Survival of medically treated patients in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry. Circulation 66: 562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Murphy ML, Hultgren HN, Detre K, Thomsen J, Takaro T (1977) Treatment of chronic stable angina. A preliminary report of survival data of the randomized Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. Engl J Med 297: 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Paine TD, Dye LE, Roitman DI, Sheffield LT, Rackley CE, Rüssel RO, Rogers WJ (1978) Relation of graded exercise test findings after myocardial infarction to extent of coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Am J Cardiol 42: 716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Proudfit WL, Bruschke AVG, Sones FM Jr (1978) Natural history of obstructive coronary artery disease: Ten years’ study of 601 nonsurgical cases. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 21: 53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Reindell H, König K, Roskamm H (1967) Funktionsdiagnostik des gesunden und kranken Herzens. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 248–249Google Scholar
- Samek L, Roskamm H, Rentrop P, Kaiser P, Stürzenhofecker P, Schober B, Görnandt L, Velden R (1975) Belastungsprüfungen und Koronarangiogramm im chronischen Infarktstadium. Z Kardiol 64: 809PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Selzer A (1982) On the limitation of therapeutic intervention trials in ischemic heart disease: A clinican’s viewpoint. Am J Cardiol 49: 252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Starling MR, Crawford MH, Kennedy GT, O’Rourke RA (1980) Exercise testing early after myocardial infarction: Predictive value for subsequent unstable angina and death. Am J Cardiol 46: 909PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Theroux P, Waters DD, Halpen C, Debaisieux J, Mizgala HF (1980) Prognostic value of exercise testing after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 301: 341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tubau JF, Chaitman BR, Bourassa MG, Waters DD (1980) Detection of multivessel coronary disease after myocardial infarction using exercise stress testing and multiple ECG lead systems. Circulation 61: 44PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Weiner DA, McCabe C, Klein MD, Ryan TJ (1978) ST segment changes post-infarction: predictive value for multivessel coronary disease and left ventricular aneurysm. Circulation 58: 887PubMedGoogle Scholar