Advertisement

Fractures In and Around the Knee Joint

  • Ch. Brunner

Abstract

Fractures of the femur in children are usually situated in the diaphysis and seldom occur in the metaphysis or epiphysis. Unusually severe violence is required to fracture the femur in the vicinity of the knee joint. Road traffic accidents are the most frequent cause, and there are often concomitant injuries with severe damage to the soft tissues surrounding the fracture. Direct violence usually leads to metaphyseal fracture of the supracondylar femur without involvement of the epiphyseal plate. Indirect violence, such as hyperextension of the knee joint generates shear forces in the distal femur which cause simple separation of the epiphysis. If there is an additional bending component, separation of the epiphysis occurs with the inclusion of a metaphyseal fragment (Aitken I). During forcible abduction or adduction of the knee joint with simultaneous axial compression, the pressure of the medial or lateral tibial plateau on the corresponding femoral condyle causes the latter to break away. The resulting fracture transects the growth cartilage of the epiphyseal plate and abnormal growth frequently results. The same trauma mechanism may lead to avulsion of a collateral ligament; since the insertion of the latter is adjacent to the epiphyseal plate, an injury of this type may also be followed by abnormal growth.

Keywords

Knee Joint Proximal Tibia Tibial Tuberosity Avulsion Fracture Epiphyseal Plate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, A. P.: The end results of the fractured distal tibial epiphysis. J. Bone Jt Surg. 18, 3, 685 (1936).Google Scholar
  2. Aitken, A. P., Magill, H. K.: Fractures involving the femoral epiphyseal cartilage. J. Bone Jt Surg. 38A,1056 (1956).Google Scholar
  3. Ehalt, W.: Verletzungen bei Kindern and Jugendlichen. Stuttgart: Enke, 1960.Google Scholar
  4. Harris, H. A.: Bone growth in health and disease; the biological principles underlying the clinical, radiological and histological diagnosis of perversions of growth and disease in the skeleton. London-Oxford: Univ. Press 1933.Google Scholar
  5. Müller, M. E., Ganz, R.: Luxationen and Frakturen: Untere Gliedmaβen and Becken. In: Unfallverletzungen bei Kindern (Hrsg. J. Rehn). Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. Süssenbach, F., Weber, B. G.: Epiphysenfugenverletzungen am distalen Unterschenkel. Bern-Stuttgart-Wien: Hans Huber 1970.Google Scholar
  7. Tachdjian, O.: Pediatric Orthopaedics. Philadelphia-London-Toronto: Saunders 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Weber, B. G.: Epiphysenfugenverletzungen. Helv. chir. Acta 31, 103 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Weber, B. G.: Indikationen zur operativen Frakturenbehandlung bei Kindern. Chirurg 10, 441 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ch. Brunner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations