Muscle and Pump Function of the Mammalian Heart

  • D. L. Brutsaert
  • W. J. Paulus
Part of the International Boehringer Mannheim Symposia book series (BOEHRINGER)

Abstract

In the evaluation of the mechanical function of the ventricle, attention has been devoted to the analysis of the heart as a muscle rather than as a pump. Several contractile properties of isolated mammalian cardiac muscle are now well characterized. Yet the application of these muscle concepts to the intact heart remains controversial due to the many assumptions in modeling the ventricle, failure to account for some conceptual limitations, and the complex physiologic loading of a muscle-pump system, etc. (1–3). The ventricle is not called on to lift a constant load but to eject a viscous fluid into a viscoelastic vascular system (2, 3). Recently, we analyzed the properties of isolated cardiac muscle as an integral part of an ejecting ventricle (4). The imposed loading included inertial, resistive, and capacitive components of the cardiovascular system (Figs. 1 and 2). During this “dynamic” loading, as long as loading was dynamically increasing or decreasing, velocity of shortening was respectively lower or higher at any muscle length and total load, compared to velocity at the same length and load under static (constant preload and aiterload only) loading. Only when df/dl was zero, was velocity of shortening the same under static and dynamic loading (Fig. 3).

Keywords

Cardiac Muscle Papillary Muscle Muscle Length Pump Function Contractile Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Muskel- und Pumpfunktion des Säugetierherzens

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brutsaert, D.L., Sonnenblick, E.H.: Cardiac muscle mechanics in the evaluation of myocardial contractility and pump function: problems, concepts and directions. Progr. Cardiovasc. Dis. 16, 337–361 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Milnor, W.R.: Arterial impedance as ventricular afterload. Circulat Res. 36, 565–570 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abbot, B.C., Gordon, D.C.: A commentary on muscle mechanics. Circulat Res. 36, 1–7 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paulus, W.J., Claes, V.A., Brutsaert, D.L.: Physiological pump-loading of isolated cardiac muscle. Europ. J. Cardiol. In press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brutsaert, D.L.: The force-velocity-length-time interrelationship of cardiac muscle. In: The Physiological Basis of Starling’s Law of the Heart, London: Ciba Foundation 1974, pp. 155–175.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paulus, W.J., Claes, V.A., Brutsaert, D.L.: Physiological loading of cardiac muscle. Circulat Res. In press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suga, H., Sagawa, K., Shoukas, A.A.: Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinefrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circulat Res. 32, 314–322 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gault, J.H., Ross, J. Jr., Braunwald, E.: Contractile state of the left ventricle in man. Circulat Res. 22, 451–462 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Falsetti, H.L., Mates, R.E., Greene, D.G., Bunnell, I.L.: Vmax as an index of contractile state in man. Circulation 43, 467–479 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Quinones, M.A., Gaasch, W.H., Cole, J.S., Alexander, J.K.: Echocardiographic determinations of left ventricular stress-velocity relations in man. Circulation 51, 689–700 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. L. Brutsaert
  • W. J. Paulus

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations