Quantum Chemistry in Fock Space
Abstract
The many electron-problem of atomic or molecular theory can be formulated either in configuration space (where operators act on the coordinates of the particles) or in Fock space (where operators act on the occupation numbers of spin orbitals). The representation of operators in Fock space (often also referred to as occupation number representation or 2nd quantization) is essentially equivalent to the representation in configuration space, it is, however, more general insofar as a Fock space Hamiltonian has eigenstates with arbitrary numbers of electrons, while in configuration space the number of electrons is fixed. So Fock space is, in a sense, a direct sum of Hilbert spaces for various particle numbers. Processes like ionization or electron attachment, in which the number of electrons is changed are hence better described in Fock space than in configuration space (i.e. in n- particle Hilbert space).
Keywords
Model Space Wave Operator Diagonal Operator Energy Denominator Model Wave FunctionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Kutzelnigg W (1981) Chem Phys Lett 83:156; (1982) J Chem Phys 77:3081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Kutzelnigg W, Koch S (1983) J Chem Phys 79:4315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Knowles PJ, Handy NC (1984) Chem Phys Lett 111:315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Klahn B, Bingel WA (1977) Int J Quant Chem 11:943; (1977) 44:927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5a.Kutzelnigg W (1985) Theoret Chim Acta 68:445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5b.Klopper W, Kutzelnigg W (1986) Chem Phys Lett 134:17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Gelfand LM, Tsetline ML (1950) Dokl Acad Nauk SSSR 71:825, 1070Google Scholar
- 7.Matsen FA, Welske TL (1977) Int J Quantum Chem 12:1001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Paldus J (1976) in: Eyring H, Henderson D (eds) ‘Theoretical Chemistry: Advances and Perspectives’, Vol 2 p 131, Acad Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 9.Wick G (1950) Phys Rev 80:268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kutzelnigg W (1984) J Chem Phys 80:822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Primas H (1961) Helv Phys Acta 34:331Google Scholar
- 12.Shavitt I, Redmon L (1980) J Chem Phys 73:5711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13a.Klein DJ (1974) J Chem Phys 61:786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13b.Jørgensen F (1978) J Chem Phys 68:3952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Bloch C (1958) Nucl Phys 6:329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Kutzelnigg W (1984) in: Kümmel H and Ristig ML (eds) ‘Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories’, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol… Springer BerlinGoogle Scholar
- 16.Goldstone J (1957) Proc Roy Soc A239:267Google Scholar
- 17.Brandow BH (1967) Rev Mod Phys 39:771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hugenholtz NM (1957) Physica 23:481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kutzelnigg W (1985) J Chem Phys 82:4166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20a.Coester F, Kümmel H (1960) Nucl Phys 17:477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20b.Cizek J (1966) J Chem Phys 45:4256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Koch S, in this volumeGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hose G, Kaldor U (1979) J Chem Phys B 12:3827Google Scholar
- 23.Mukherjee D (1986) Proc Ind Acad Sci 96:145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kutzelnigg W, Mukherjee D, Koch S (1987) J Chem Phys 87:5902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Mukherjee D, Kutzelnigg W, Koch S (1987) J Chem Phys 87:5911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kutzelnigg W, Mukherjee D, to be publishedGoogle Scholar