Investigation of Methods for Global Gravity Field Recovery from the Dense ERS-1 Geodetic Mission Altimetry

  • O. Ba Andersen
  • P. Knudsen
  • C. C. Tscherning
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 116)


A number of different methods for gravity field prediction from altimetry were investigated in an area of the Greenland-Iceland-Norwegian sea. The investigation was carried out in an area with a relatively small oceanographic signal. The methods investigated were gravity field prediction using inverse Stokes method implemented using FFT and least squares collocation (LSC). The LSC procedure was investigated using different numbers of altimeter data and different procedures. These were gravity field prediction from direct altimetric observations and gravity field prediction using altimeter-derived along-track deflections of the vertical.

For the derivation of the global marine gravity field we decided to use inverse Stokes method implemented using FFT as it gives virtually the same result as would have been obtained using LSC directly. However we are missing the associated error-estimates which are obtained using LSC. These may, however, be estimated from the error-estimates obtained in the test area, by scaling the error-estimate using the ration between the local gravity variation and the value in the test area.


Fast Fourier Transformation Covariance Function Gravity Field Gravity Anomaly Altimeter Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aas, E.: De Norske Farvann. Institutt for Geofysikk, Oslo, 1994.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen O. B. and P. Knudsen: Global altimetric gravity map from the ERS-1 geodetic mission (cycle 1). Earth Obs. Quarterly, 47, 1–5, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Forsberg, R., and D. Solheim: Performance of FFT methods in local gravity field modelling. Proc. Chapman Conference on Progress in the Determination of the Earths Gravity Field, Am. Geophys. Union, 100–103, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. Knudsen, P.: Estimation and Modelling of the Local Empirical Covariance Function using gravity and satellite altimeter data. Bull. Geodesique, 61. 145–160, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Knudsen, P.: Determination of local empirical covariance functions from residual terrain reduced altimeter data Reports of the Dep. of Geodetic Science and Surveying no. 395Google Scholar
  6. The Ohio State University, Columbus, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. Knudsen, P.: Integration of Altimetry and Gravimetry by Optimal Estimation Techniques. In Altimetry in Geodesy and Oceanography, edited by RRummel & F.Sanso, Lecture Notes in Earth Sci., 50, Springer Verlag, 453–466, 1993.Google Scholar
  8. Knudsen, P., O.Ba. Andersen and C.C. Tscherning.: Altimetric gravity anomalies in the Norwegian-Greenland Sea–Preliminary Results from the ERS-1 35 days repeat mission. Geophys. Res. Lett., 19 (17), 1795–1798, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moritz, H.: Advanced Physical Geodesy. H.Wichmann Verlag, Karlsruhe, 1980.Google Scholar
  10. Rapp, R.H.: Detailled Gravity Anomalies and Sea Surface Heights derived from GEOS-3/SEASAT Altimeter Data. Rep. of the Dep. of Geod. Sci. and Surveying, No. 365. The Ohio State Univ.. Columbus. 1985.Google Scholar
  11. Rapp, R.H.: Gravity anomalies and sea surface heights derived from a combined Geos-3/SEASAT altimeter data set. J.Geoph.Res.,. 91, 4867–4876, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rapp, R.H., Y.M. Wang and N.K. Pavlis: The Ohio State 1991 Geopotential and Sea Surface Topography Harmonic Coefficient Models. Rep. of the Dep. of. Science and Surv. 410, Ohio State Univ., Columbus, 1991.Google Scholar
  13. Rummel, R. & R.H.N. Haaunans: Gravity gradients from satellite altimetry. Mar. Geodesy, 14, 1–12, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sandwell, D. T.: A Detailed View of the South Pacific Geoid From Satellite Altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 89, 1089–1105, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sandwell, D.T. & W.H. Smith: Global Marine Gravity Field From ERS-1, Geosat and Seasat. Scripps Institute of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Tscherning, C.C., P. Knudsen and R. Forsberg: Description of the GRAVSOFT package. Geophysical Institute, University of Copenhagen, Technical Report, 1991, 2nd. Ed. 1992, 3. Ed. 1993, 4. ed. 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Tscherning, C.C., R. Forsberg and P. Knudsen: The GRAVSOFT package for geoid determination. Proc. First Continental Workshop on the Geoid in Europe, Prague, 327–334. Prague, 1992.Google Scholar
  18. Tscherning, C.C. and R.H. Rapp: Closed Covariance Expressions for Gravity Anomalies, Geoid Undulations, and Deflections of the Vertical Implied by Anomaly Degree Variances. Rep208, Dept. of Geod. Sci. Surv., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, 1974.Google Scholar
  19. Zhang, C, & J.A.R. Biais: Comparison of methods for marine gravity determination from satellite altimetry data in the Labrador Sea. Bulletin Geodesique, 69 (3), 173–180, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Ba Andersen
    • 1
  • P. Knudsen
    • 1
  • C. C. Tscherning
    • 2
  1. 1.Kort- og MatrikelstyrelsenCopenhagen NVDenmark
  2. 2.Geofysisk Dept.University of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations