Are there optimum sites for global paleotemperature reconstruction?

  • Raymond S. Bradley
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (volume 41)


In order to place the relatively short instrumental record of global mean annual temperature in perspective, long proxy records are needed. Since it is unlikely there will ever be a globally extensive network of well-calibrated proxy records, it is necessary to identify sites which capture most of the variance of the larger scale average, to be used as representative time series for global means.

This problem is approached by examining different spatially extensive data sets (instrumental and GCM-derived) to determine the pattern of spatial correlation with the larger-scale mean series over different time-averages. A 1,000 year simulation (from the GFDL coupled atmosphere-ocean GCM) is used to examine the usefulness of various proxy indicator sites as predictors of global mean annual temperature series, for both inter-annual, and inter-decadal variations. Realistic networks of sites are used, representing locations where paleoclimatic records from corals, high latitude tree-rings, polar ice cores, mid and low latitude ice cores and mid-latitude historical and varved sediments have been obtained. From this limited set of sites, optimum networks are identified for both inter-annual and inter-decadal reconstructions. A combination of low latitude oceanic sites and interior continental locations seems to provide the best network for the reconstruction of global mean annual temperature.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bradley RS, Jones PD. (1993) “Little Ice Age” summer temperature variations: their nature and relevance to global warming trends. The Holocene, 3: 367–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briffa K, Jones PD. (1993) Global surface temperature variations during the twentieth century: Part 2: implications for large-scale high frequency paleoclimatic studies. The Holocene, 3: 77–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunbar R, Cole J. (1993) Coral Records of Ocean-Atmosphere Variability. NOAA Climate and Global Change Program, Special Report No. 10, Washington D.C., 37 ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Fritts HC. (1976) Tree Rings and Climate. Academic Press, New York, 567 ppGoogle Scholar
  5. Madden RA, Shea DJ, Branstator DW, Tribbia JJ, Weber RO. (1993) The effects of imperfect spatial and temporal sampling on estimates of the global mean temperature: experiments with model data. J. Climate, 6: 1057–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Manabe S, Bryan K, Spelman MJ. (1990) Transient response of a global ocean-atmosphere model to a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Oceanog. 20: 722–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Manabe S, Stouffer RJ, Spelman MJ, Bryan K. (1991) Transient responses of a coupled ocean-atmosphere model to gradual changes of atmospheric C02. Part 1. Annual mean response. J. Climate, 4: 785–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Stouffer RJ, Manabe S, Vinnikov K Ya (1994) Model assessment of natural variability in recent global warming. Nature, 367: 634–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raymond S. Bradley
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeosciencesUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA

Personalised recommendations