Skin Cancer and UV Radiation pp 1103-1110 | Cite as
Skin Cancer Evaluation using Texture and Form Analysis of Sonograms
Abstract
For the pre-operative assessment of skin tumors, high resolution ultrasound systems utilizing frequencies between 7,5 and 20 MHz are increasingly used [1–5] Currently, efforts are focusing on the processing of sonographic images to obtain an objective interpretation of sonographic findings [6–11]. In order to differentiate between various skin tumors, the subjective impression of the sonographer, which is determined by the individual experience, needs to be translated into reproducible texture and form analysis of the tumors. Traditionally, the sonographic assessment of tumors is based upon reproducible sonographic patterns. Sonographic images are the result of complex interaction (reflection, absorption, scattering) of the tissue with the transmitted signal. This is reflected by the sonographic B-image [12]. For the sonographic assessment, the lateral extension as well as that into deeper layers of the tumor, its differentiation from the surrounding tissue, its echomorphology, and specific ultrasound phenomena such as dorsal sound amplification, sound shadow and lateral sound extinction are to be considered. The diagnosis made by the sonographer is based on these phenomena. Since differential diagnostic considerations in the pre-operative assessment of pigmented and non-pigmented tumors are necessary, malignant melanoma, basal cell carcinomas, and squamous cell carcinomas were examined sonographically and evaluated by computerized analysis. Seventy-one histologically proven skin tumors were studied utilizing a computer program developed in our laboratory. In addition, we provide data as to the potential of the method.
Keywords
Squamous Cell Carcinoma Basal Cell Carcinoma Skin Tumor Sjogren Syndrome Sonographic ImagePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Harland CC, Bamber JC, Gusterson BA et al. (1993) High frequency, high resolution B-scan ultra sound in the assesssment of skin tumors. Br J Dermatol 128: 525–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Hoffmann K, Jung J, el-Gammal S et al. (1992) Malignant melanoma in 20 MHz B-scan - sonography. Dermatology 185: 49–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Merk G, Merk H, Ulrich I et al (1992) Observations and experiences in sonographic grading and staging of malignant melanomas. In: Altmeyer P, El-Gammal S, Hoffmann, K (eds), Ultrasound in Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 130–6Google Scholar
- 4.Merk G, Ulrich J, Kühne KH (1995) Die Ultraschalldiagnostik in der onkologischen Dermatologie. In: Winter H, Bellmann KP, (eds) Operative Dermatologie Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 82–90Google Scholar
- 5.Tacke J, Haagen G, Hornstein OP et al. (1995) Clinical relevance of sonometry-derived tumor thickness in malignant melanoma- a statistical analysis. Br J Dermatol 132: 209–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Fein M, Zuna I, Lorenz WJ et al. Neue Auswerteeinheit zur Ultraschallbildanalyse mit dem Ziel der Gewebecharakterisierung. Med Phys 12: 314–315Google Scholar
- 7.Layer G, Zuna I, Lorenz A et al. (1991) Computerized ultrasound B-scan texture analysis of experimental diffuse parenchymal liver disease: correlation with histopathology and tissue composition. J Clin Ultrasound 19: 193–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Räth U, Schlaps D, Limber B et al. (1985) Diagnostic accuracy of computerized B-scan texture analysis and conventional ultrasonography in diffuse parenchymal and malignant liver disease. J Clin Ultrasound 13: 87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Krasner BH, Garra BS, Mun SK (1994) US tissue characterization workstation: appplicants and design. Radiographics 14: 1415–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Zuna I (1991) Aktueller Stand der sonographischen Gewebeklassifizierung. In: Günther RW, Gockel P, (Hrsg) Jahrbuch der Radiologie. Biermann, Zülpich, pp 135–144Google Scholar
- 11.el-Gammal S, Hoffmann K, Höss A et al. (1992) New Concepts and developments in high- resolution ultrasound. In: Altmeyer P, el-Gammal S, Hoffmann K (eds) Ultrasound in Dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 399–442Google Scholar
- 12.Delorme S, Zuna I (1995) Quantitative Auswerteverfahren in der B-Bild- und Farbdoppler- sonographie. Ultraschall Klin Praxis 10: 50–61Google Scholar
- 13.Garra BS, Krassner BH, Horii SC et al. (1993) Improving the distinction between benign and malignant breast lesions: the value of sonographic texture analysis: Ultrason Imaging 15:267–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ariji Y, Ohki M, Euguchi K et al. (1996) Texture analysis of sonographic features of the parotid gland in Sjögren syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 166: 943–41Google Scholar
- 15.Bader W, Böhmer S, Otto WR et al. (1994) Texturanalyse: Ein neues Verfahren zur Beurteilung sonographisch darstellbarer Herdbefunde der Mamma. Bildgebung 62: 284–90Google Scholar
- 16.Ferdeghini EM, Morelli G, Distante A et al. (1995) Assessment of normal testis growth by quantitative texture analysis. Med Eng Phys 17: 523–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Huber S, Delorme S, Knopp et al. (1994) Brest tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color doppler US. Radiology 192:797–801PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Oosterveld BJ, Thijsen JM, Hartman PC et al. (1993) Detection of diffuse liver desease by quantitative echography: dependence on a Priori choice of parameters. Ultrasound Med Biol 19: 21–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar