Assessing Stability Properties: How Suitable is this Approach for Ecosystem Research in the Wadden Sea?

  • Sabine Dittmann

Abstract

With stability properties as the conceptual framework to study processes in the Wadden Sea ecosystem, attention was focused on qualitative aspects. The relationships between the approach of ELAWAT and historical developments of ecosystem research and ecological concepts are briefly described. While the realization of this approach was restricted by the dynamic nature of the system under study and the limited duration of the project, a potential for future research is seen in the consideration of the single criteria of the ecological checklist used. Furthermore, quantitative and qualitative approaches should be combined in the future to allow an integrated analysis of dynamic ecosystems like the Wadden Sea.

Keywords

Stability Property Ecosystem Approach Ecosystem Research Ecological Situation Ecological Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradbury RH, Green DG, Reichelt RE (1986) Qualitative patterns and processes in marine ecology: A conceptual programme. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 29: 299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bradbury RH, van der Laan JD, Green DG (1996) The idea of complexity in ecology. Senckenbergiana marit 27: 89–96Google Scholar
  3. Connell JH, Sousa W (1983) On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence. Am Nat 121:798–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dittmann S (1996) Resilience and exchange processes: integrated view on the ecosystem of the Wadden Sea. Wadden Sea News Letter 1996-3: 8–9Google Scholar
  5. Dittmann S, Kroncke 1, Albers B, Liebezeit G (Eds), (1996) The concept of ecosystems. Senckenbergiana marit 27: 81-255Google Scholar
  6. Dittmann S, Marencic H, Roy M (1997) Ökosystemforschung im Niedersächsischen Wattenmeer. In: Fränzle O, Müller F, Schröder W (Eds) Handbuch der Umweltwissenschaften. Ecomed. Landsberg, V-4.1.2Google Scholar
  7. Gätje C, Reise R (1998) Ökosystem Wattenmeer. Austausch-, Transport- und Stoffumwandlungsprozesse. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Gleason HA (1939) The individualistic concept of the plant association. Amer Midi Nat 21: 92–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gray JS (1977) The stability of benthic ecosystems. Helgolander Meeresunters 30: 427–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimm V (1996) A down-to-earth assessment of stability concepts in ecology: dreams, demands, and the real problems. Senckenbergiana marit 27: 215–226Google Scholar
  11. Grimm V, Schmidt E, Wissel C (1992) On the application of stability concepts in ecology. Ecological Modelling 63: 143–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grimm V, Wissel C (1997) Babel, or the ecological stability discussions: An inventory and analysis of terminology and a guide for avoiding confusion. Oecologia 109: 323–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 4: 1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jax K, Vareschi E, Zauke G-P (1993) Entwicklung eines theoretischen Konzeptes zur Ökosystemforschung Wattenmeer. Umweltbundesamt Berlin. Texte 47/93Google Scholar
  15. Leuschner C, Scherer B (1989) Fundamentals of an applied ecosystem research project in the Wadden Sea of Schleswig-Holstein. Helgolander Meeresunters 43: 565–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Likens GE (1992) The Ecosystem Approach: Its Use and Abuse. Excellence In Ecology 3. Kinne O (Ed) Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/LuheGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindemann RL (1942) The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23: 399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mac Arthur RH (1955) Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability. Ecology 36: 533–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. May RM (1971) Stability in multi-species community models. Mathematical Biosciences 12: 59–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Neill RV, DeAngelis DL, Waide JB, Allen TFH (1986) A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems. Monographs in Population Biology 23. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Odum EP (1971) Fundamentals of Ecology (3rd edition). Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  22. Orians GH (1975) Diversity, stability and maturity in natural ecosystems. In: van Dobben WH, Lowe-McConnel RH (Eds) Unifying Concepts in Ecology. Junk, The Hague, pp 139–149Google Scholar
  23. Paine R-T, Levin SA (1981). Intertidal landscapes: disturbance and the dynamics of pattern. Ecol Monographs 51: 145–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics Academic Press, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  25. Pimm SL (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307: 321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reise K (1995) Predictive ecosystem research in the Wadden Sea. Helgoländer Meeresunters 49: 495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Remmert H (1991) The Mosaic Cycle Concept of Ecosystems. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson JL (1980). The organismic community: resilience of an embattled ecological concept. Bioscience 30: 465–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tansley AG (1935) The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology 16 (3) 284–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Dittmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations