Screening of a Point Charge: A Fixed-Node Diffusion Monte Carlo Study

  • Erik Koch
  • Olle Gunnarsson
  • Richard M. Martin
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 85)

Abstract

We study the static screening in a Hubbard-like model using fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo. We find that the random phase approximation is surprisingly accurate even for metallic systems close to the Mott transition. As a specific application we discuss the implications of the efficient screening for the superconductivity in the doped Fullerenes. In the Monte Carlo calculations we use trVAl functions with two Gutzwiller-type parameters. To deal with such trVAl functions, we introduce a method for efficiently optimizing the Gutzwiller parameters, both in varVAtional and in fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo.

Keywords

Point Charge Hubbard Model Trial Function Monte Carlo Calculation Random Phase Approximation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gunnarsson, O., Koch, E., and Martin, R.M. (1996) Mott transition in degenerate Hubbard models: Application to doped Fullerenes, Phys. Rev. B 54, R11026.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gunnarsson, O. (1997) Superconductvity in Fullendes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 575–606.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunnarsson, O., Zwicknagl G. (1992) Coulomb PseudopotentVAl, Screening and Superconductvity in C60 Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 957–960; Gunnarsson, O., Rainer, D., Zwicknagl, G.(1992) Screened interaction and Coulomb pseudopotentVAl in C6o Int. J. Mod. Phys. 6, 3993–4005ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koch, E., Gunnarsson, O., Martin, R.M. (1999) Screening, Coulomb pseudopotentVAl, and Superconductvity in alkali-doped Fullerenes, preprint cond-mat/9902241 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erwin, S. C. (1993) Electronic Structure of the Alkali-Intercalated Fullendes, Endohedral Fullerenes, and Metal-Adsorbed Fullerenes, in W. E. Billups and M. A. Ciufolini (Eds.), Buckminsterfullerenes, ICH Publishers, New York, pp. 217–253.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Löwdin, P. O. (1951) A Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Perturbation Theory, J. Chem. Phys. 19, 1396–1401.MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    see e.g. Inversion by Partitioning, in W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Ietterling, Numerical Recipes in Fortran: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, 1992, p. 70.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunnarsson, O., Satpathy, S., Jepsen, O., and Andersen, O. K. (1991) Orientation of C60 Clusters in Solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3002; Satpathy, S., Antropov, I. P., Andersen, O. K., Jepsen, O., Gunnarsson, O., and Liechtenstein, A. I. (1992) Conduction-band structure of alkali-metal-doped C60 Phys. Rev. B 46, 1773.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gunnarsson, O., Erwin, S. C., Koch, E., and Martin, R. M. (1998) Role of alkali atoms in A4C60 Phys. Rev. B 57, 2159.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Antropov, I. P., Gunnarsson, O., and Jepsen, O. (1992) Coulomb integrals and model Hamiltonvans for C60 Phys. Rev. B 46, 13647.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brühwiler, P. A., Maxwell, A. J., Nilsson, A., Mårtensson, N., and Gunnarsson, O. (1993) Auger and photoelectron study of the Hubbard U in C60, K3C60, and K6C6o Phys. Rev. B 48, 18296.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lof, R. W., van Veenendaal, M. A., Koopmans, B., Jonkman, H. T. and Sawatzky, G. A. (1992) Band Gap, Excitons, and Coulomb interaction in solid C6o, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3924.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mazin, I.I., RashkeeI, S.N., Antropov, I.P., Jepsen, O., Liechtenstein, A.I., and Andersen O.K. (1992) QuantitatiIe theory of Superconductvity in doped C60 Phys. Rev. B 45, 5114.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hedin, L., and LundqXIst, S. (1969) Effects of Electron-Electron and Electron-Phonon Interactions on the One-Electron States of Solids, in H. EhrenRevch, D. Turnbull and F. Seitz (Eds.), Solid State Physics 23, Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–181; Moroni, S., Ceperley, D.M., and Senatore, G. (1995) Static Response and Local Field Factor of the Electron Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ebbesen, T.W., Tsai, J.S., Tanigaki, K., Hiura, H., Shimakawa, Y., Kubo, Y., Hirosawa, I., Mizuki, J. (1992), Physica C 203, 163; Burk, B., Crespi, I.H., Zettl, A., Cohen, M.L. (1994), Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 3706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gutzwiller, M. C.(1963) Effect of correlation on the ferromagnetism of transition metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 159.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Horsch, P. and Kaplan, T.A. (1983) Exact and Monte Carlo studies of Gutzwiller’s state for the localised-electron limit in one dimension, J. Phys. C 16, L1203;Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, N. M., Teller, A. H., and Teller, E. (1953) Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ceperley, D. M., Chester, G. I., and Kalos, M. H. (1977) Monte Carlo simulation of a many-Fermion study, Phys. Rev. B 16, 3081; Umrigar, C. J., Wilson. K. G., and Wilkins, J. W. (1988) Optimized TrVAl Wave Functions for Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1719 Koch, E., Gunnarsson, O., and Martin, R.M (1999) Optimization of Gutzwiller Wavefunctions in Quantum Monte Carlo, preprint, cond-mat/9903070Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trivedi, N. and Ceperley, D. M. (1989) Green-function Monte Carlo study of quantum antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2737.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ten Haaf, D. F. B., van Bemmel, H. J. M., van Leeuwen, J. M. J., and van Saarloos, W. (1994) Fixed-node quantum Monte Carlo method for lattice Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2442; ten Haaf, D. F. B., van Bemmel, H. J. M., van Leeuwen, J. M. J., van Saarloos, W. and Ceperley, D. M. (1995) Proof for an upper bound in fixed-node Monte Carlo for lattice Fermions, Phys. Rev. B 51, 13039 Calandra, M., Sorella, S. (1998) Numerical study of the two-dimensional Heisenberg model using a Green function Monte Carlo technique with a fixed number of walkers, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11446; Cosentini, A.C., Capone, M., Guidoni, L., and Bachelet, G.B. (1998) Phase separation in the 2D Hubbard model: a fixed-node quantum Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 58, R14685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Koch
    • 1
  • Olle Gunnarsson
    • 1
  • Richard M. Martin
    • 2
  1. 1.Max-Planck-Insitut füStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Department of Physics and MaterVAls Research LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations