Long-Chain Branched Polyethene via Metallocene-Catalysis: Comparison of Catalysts
Abstract
Metallocene catalysts have enabled the production of long-chain branched (LCB) polyethene at low pressure and temperature. The assumed LCB mechanism for the branched structure is the copolymerization of vinyl terminated macromonomers with ethene. In order to obtain LCB polyethene effectively, the employed metallocene-catalyst should be able to produce polyethene with vinyl terminals and effectively copolymerize the formed macromonomers with ethene. We present results of our recent investigation in which we have compared the properties of polyethenes polymerized with five conventional metallocene catalysts activated with methylaluminoxane (MAO); Et[Ind]2ZrCl2, Et[H4Ind]2ZrCl2, (n-BuCp)2ZrCl2, Me2Si[Ind]2ZrCl2 and Cp2ZrCl2. We have examined and discussed the relation between chain transfer mechanisms, hydrogen effect, copolymerization abilities, and rheological behavior of the polyethenes.
Keywords
Chain Transfer Ethene Concentration Hydrogen Effect Metallocene Catalyst Monomer Reactivity RatioPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Sinn H, Kaminsky W (1980) Adv Organomet Chem 18: 99–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Brintzinger H-H, Fischer D, Mülhaupt R, Rieger B, Waymouth RM (1995) Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 34: 1143–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Kim YS, Chung Cl, Lai S-Y, Hyun KS (1996) J Appl Polym Sci 59: 125–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Hamielec AE, Soares JBP (1996) Prog Polym Sci 21: 651–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Lai S-Y, Wilson JR, Knight GW, Stevens JC, Chum P-WS, US Patent 5,272,236, Dec. 21, 1993Google Scholar
- 6.Brant P, Canich JAM, Dias AJ, Bamberger RL, Licciardi GF, Henrichs PM, Int Pat Appl WO 94/07930, 24 April 1994Google Scholar
- 7.Malmberg A, Kokko E, Lehmus P, Löfgren B, Seppälä JV (1998) Macromolecules 31:8448–8454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Wang W-J Yan D, Zhu S, Hamielec AE (1998) Macromolecules 31: 8677–8683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kokko E, Malmberg A, Lehmus P, Löfgren B, Seppälä JV (2000) J Polym Sci Part A Polym Chem 38: 376–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kolodka E, Wang W-J, Charpentier PA, Zhu S, Hamielec AE (2000) Polymer 41:3985–3991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Shiono T, Moriki Y, Soga K (1995) Macromol Symp 97: 161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Siedle AR, Lamanna WM, Newmark RA, Schroepfer JN (1998) J Mol Catal A Chem28: 257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Thorshaug K, Støvneng JA, Rytter E, Ystenes M (1998) Macromolecules 31: 7149–7165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lehmus P, Kokko E, Härkki O, Leino R, Luttikhedde H, Näsman J, Seppälä JV (1999)Macromolecules 32: 3547–3552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Harrell ER, Nakajima N (1984) J Appl Polym Sci 29: 995–1010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Bersted BH (1985) J Appl Polym Sci 30: 3751–3765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Carella JM, Gotro JT, Graessley WW (1986) Macromolecules 19: 659–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Vega JF, Santamaría A, MuÑoz-Escalona A, Lafuente P (1998) Macromolecules 31:3639–3647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Malmberg A, Liimatta J, Lehtinen A, Löfgren B (1999) Macromolecules 32: 6687–6696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Raju VR, Smith GG, Marin G, Knox JR, Graessley WW (1979) J Polym Sci Polym Phys Ed 17: 1183–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar