Advertisement

Credit Risk pp 35-48 | Cite as

Systematic Risk in Homogeneous Credit Portfolios

  • Christian Bluhm
  • Ludger Overbeck
Conference paper
Part of the Contributions to Economics book series (CE)

Abstract

In credit portfolios (see [5] for an introduction) there are typically two types of counterparties: Listed firms and non-listed borrowers. For the first type, a time series of the firm’s equity values can be used to derive an Ability-to-Pay Process (APP), showing for every point in time the firm’s ability to pay, see e.g. [6]. For the second type, equity processes are not available, but still every borrower somehow admits an APP, depending on the customer’s assets and liabilities, sometimes known by the lending institute, but in any case imposed as an unobservable latent variable. In general, we can expect that correlations between the obligor’s APPs strongly influence the portfolio’s credit risk.

Keywords

Credit Risk Systematic Risk Default Probability Corporate Bond Rating Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision; The Internal Ratings-Based Approach; Consultative Document, January (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belkin, B., Suchower, S., Forest, L.R. Jr.; The effect of systematic credit risk on loan portfolio value-at-risk and loan pricing; CreditMetrics Monitor, Third Quarter (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belkin, B., Suchower, S., Forest, L.R. Jr.; A one-parameter representation of credit risk and transition matrices; CreditMetrics™ Monitor, Third Quarter (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Black, F., Scholes, M. ; The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities; Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–654 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bluhm, C., Overbeck, L., Wagner, C.; An Introduction to Credit Risk Modeling; Chapman & Hall/CRC Financial Mathematics; CRC Press (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crosbie, P.; Modelling Default Risk; KMV Corporation (1999) (www.kmv.com)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Embrechts, P., McNeil, A., Straumann, D. Correlation and Dependence in Risk Management: Properties and Pitfalls, Preprint, July 1999.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frey, R., McNeil, A.J.; Modelling Döpendent Defaults; Preprint, March (2001)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Finger, C.C.; Conditional Approaches for CreditMetrics Portfolio Distributions;CreditMetrics Monitor, April (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Joe, H. Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts; Chapman & Hal (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Merton, R On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates; The Journal of Finance 29 449–470 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moody’s Investors Service; Default & Recovery Rates of Corporate Bond Issuers February (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vasicek, O.A.; Probability ofLoss on Loan Portfolio; KMV Corporation (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Bluhm
    • 1
  • Ludger Overbeck
    • 2
  1. 1.Hypo VereinsbankMunichGermany
  2. 2.Deutsche BankFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations